Jim Taylor's picture
Jim Taylor

The Tech Shrink

Microsoft has lost its mojo: An open letter to Bill Gates

Dear Bill, 

I know you've been retired from Microsoft's day-to-day operations for about a year now and Steve B. is running the show, but you are still Chairman of the Board and the public identity of Microsoft. That's why I'm writing you, Bill, because Microsoft is still your company and it needs you. Think modified Pottery Barn rule: you own it, you broke it, you fix it.

Microsoft may be the largest and most dominant computer software company on Earth, but, at this point in the evolution of the company and the industry, such a description may be less an accolade than a cautionary tale. Yes, your operating system, productivity software, and browser dominate market share, but recent data indicate that your market share over all is eroding. Yes, Microsoft wields almost oligarchical power over the entire computer industry. And, yes, Microsoft generates billions of dollars in revenue every year and it has made you one very rich dude.

But the way I see, Microsoft is looking a little long in the tooth lately. The Apple ads where Microsoft and Apple are personified say it all. Apple is young, hip, funny, and fit. Microsoft is middle aged, geeky, boring, and out of shape (no offense to John Hodgman, the actor who portrays Microsoft). As for those laptop hunter ads, it's like dressing a geek in hipster clothing; still a geek underneath. And Apple thoroughly schooled you with its mocking response.

So, it's time to face reality, Bill. Microsoft has lost its mojo. Don't get me wrong; I'm not one of those Apple fanboys who's here to smack down your company. I use Microsoft at home and on the road. I respect what Microsoft has accomplished, that's why I'm writing you this letter. Microsoft needs to get back on track and you're the only man who can do the job.

One of my fellow bloggers at Computerworld, Preston Gralla, sees things a little differently, arguing that Microsoft is actually getting its mojo back. He cites the upcoming release of Windows 7, the well-regarded beta of a new version of Office, and the recent release of Bing.

But I don't buy it, Bill, and neither do most of the commenters in Preston's post. Let's be honest, Microsoft hasn't been putting out the latest and greatest software these days. Did someone say Vista? Or Windows Live Search? These are barely mediocre products. They lack two things Microsoft had in spades in your younger days: vision and innovation. I can't believe you signed off on them. Yes, Windows 7 is an improvement, but the breath you're hearing is not the panting of anticipation over a groundbreaking OS, but rather an exhale of relief over being able to say goodbye to Vista. As for Bing, it's perfectly functional, but offers little that will lure people from the familiarity of Google. Microsoft's products are now pure corporate, no heart and soul. Microsoft can get away with it these days because it pretty much owns the computing world.

The first question to ask is: Why did Microsoft lose its mojo? I think there are a few very good reasons.

First, it became a behemoth and, though large and powerful, behemoths aren't very agile or adaptable (think Ice Age). Though I don't have any data to support this, I'm going to guess that there is an inverse relationship between size and creativity and, if so, Microsoft is a victim of its own success.

Second, Microsoft lost its hunger, its edge. Microsoft just doesn't need it that bad anymore. It's gotten too comfortable up there in the Great Northwest and comfort breeds complacency which gives rise to stagnation.

Third, Microsoft hasn't had anyone pushing it for a long time. Microsoft just has no competition. It needs a Nadal to your Federer, a Mickelson to your Tiger. But who has Microsoft got for competition? Apple? Sure, Apple is pesky and Jobs gets all the headlines, but Apple is more glitter than guts and your housekeeper probably makes more than Jobs does. And Google is just a baby and will likely have its own growing pains.

Fourth, there is the inevitable brain drain. Over the last few years there has been a steady exodus out of Microsoft as many of its top minds have moved on to greener pastures, such as Google. For creative minds, improving on the wheel just doesn't satisfy the soul. Hungry minds nourish themselves on urgency and excitement and the sweet taste of new ideas.

But the  past is past and the question for the future is: How does Microsoft get its mojo back? Though there is much that can be done structurally within Microsoft, I think it all has to start with leadership. No offense to Steve, he seems like a perfectly competent fellow (though some disagree), but Microsoft needs a spiritual leader again who can take it into the future by reconnecting with its past. Think about how you felt when you were that young Harvard dropout living at home and your parents were asking what kind of future you can possibly have without a college degree. What drove you back then? Money and power? I don't think so. I'm going to go out on a limb and toss out words like passion, purpose, and ideas. I'll bet you couldn't sleep nights and couldn't wait to get up in the morning to create cool computer stuff. And, if recent products are any indication, that's what's missing around Redmond these days.

Even though you've officially stepped aside as the head of Microsoft, you still are its de facto leader. It's time for you to accept the inevitable and return to the throne and lead Microsoft back to the promised land.

If you'd like to talk further, why don't you call for an appointment.

Until then, Bill, time for some soul searching.

Respectfully,

Jim Taylor, Ph.D.

 

What People Are Saying

microsoft just got out of deep slumber

The article doesn't look at individual units under microsoft seperately.
And I wonder whether the Author has ever heard about :
1. Azure and SharePoint,
2. Zune and Project Pink,
3. Xbox and Project Natal,
4. Surface and Second Light,
5. Photosynth,
6. .NET 4, Axum, Expression Studio, SilverLight
7. Win7, Singularity and Gazelle
8. Bing !! and Yahoo !!!
9. Office 2010 and Web

The following article can shed some light...
http://www.labnol.org/software/microsoft-getting-things-right/8902/

Ridiculous time to say this

This is a ridiculous time to say something like this.

Microsoft relaunched their web search, and it has met with success and is in some ways better than Google's. On the business side, they devoured market share by 'partnering' with Yahoo.

They revealed Windows 7, to accolades from many satisfied testers.

They revealed Zune HD, and many hail its interface as miles above the competition.

They have been getting very good press compared to the competition when it comes to security.

IE8 has more mojo than any browser they've ever put work into.

Office 2010 looks amazing, Morro got great reviews, Windows Live Essentials is well-loved..

Their mice are still praised and they're releasing best-of-class innovative keyboards.

They're leading excitement in the videogaming world, with XBox Live and their reveal of Project Natal.

Silverlight 3 is da shiznit.

Their advertising is very well received, and they're about to enter brick-and-mortar retail.

******************

If there's ever been a year to lament Microsoft losing Mojo, this year is not it.

BRILLIANT!

LMAO (Cleaning the coffee from my keyboard)

And they say satire is dead.

Silverlight 3 is da shiznit.

CRAP! More coffee to clean up.

Thanks, Craig, for getting my day off to a bright start :-)

My personal opinion about MS

My personal opinion about Microsoft:

-not innovative
-not positive
-like Soviet Union in early 1980's
-boring
- somehow "grey"

(however target for joking)

I am very surprised at all

I am very surprised at all the generic comments and generic advise. i was hoping for some insight rather than the usual insults and immediate disclaimer of that insult. You disclaimed most of your insights.

Let him be

Bill Gates has given so much to this world. I think it's time to thank him for his contribution and let him live his life happily. He doesn't owe us. He's handed Microsoft off the best he could and now it's time for the current leadership to breathe new life into the organization. He's now focusing on the Gates Foundation, which is valiant and selfless and an area that's more in need of his attention. I think Microsoft has a better chance of survival if it learns how to fly on its own now, while Gates can carefully guide and nudge it in the right direction.

"640K ought to be enough for

"640K ought to be enough for anybody."
-Bill Gates

just another quote thats

just another quote thats only meaningful to you mac guys when given without proper context.

Instigator as Savior?

Over the years, Microsoft easily got away with many "sins" because it was positioned so amazingly well. It ruthlessly leveraged its control over the PC operating system and never delivered anything any better than was absolutely necessary. So what do they do now as they compete on more of a level playing field, a field that is getting more level all the time? I don't pretend to know, but the Return of Bill hardly seems like a promising remedy. In many ways, he's the guy who poorly prepared the company for this inevitable Day of Reckoning. I wouldn't exactly see him as a potential savior, open letters notwithstanding.

Don't count on Microsoft

Microsoft is not a software company, if it ever was. They are just a bank that lends money to people who may or may not work out anything usable. They, as a company, mostly can't deal with smart people and innovations good enough; they just want to push people into the existing strong managerial/diplomacy mechanics by all costs, where what is important is to preserve the current state-of-affair regarding positions some (frequently totally) incompetent people have conquered and defend mercilessly that much. Progress was never called that name. Some people find it challenging to work in such environment, and some people are there exactly because they want to manage and do not know how. Microsoft's excuse for everything is how much money they gave to innovation or for this or that cause, which means that they are either buying attention or buying products. The products we have through Microsoft, we would have anyhow and probably done better. Many products we could have we can't, because Microsoft is not willing to participate and they are killing off their competition whenever they are able to. Software world would look much better without Microsoft, but I guess we would have just another company of the same size with the same problems that would not be called Microsoft, because people's lust and greed for money and power is constantly overcoming their desire to have anything done polished and top-quality. At the same time the religious belief about what "Microsoft means to the world" is kind of disease spread through the company that allows no normal conversation about the problems that could be solved within the company. This last part is a cultural problem that can never be changed (the rooted vanity is imperishable), so I do not count on Microsoft. It will vanish soon or later regarding quality software productions, if they have not disappeared already.