Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Windows 7 Starter Edition on netbooks: Is it bait and switch?

Steve Ballmer has all but admitted that Windows 7 Starter Edition, to be sold on netbooks, is little more than a way to get people to upgrade to higher-priced versions of Windows 7. Is this the latest version of the time-honored strategy of bait and switch?

Computerworld's Gregg Keizer reports that Ballmer recently finally confirmed that Windows 7 Starter Edition will be available only on the most underpowered of netbooks.

Keizer reports that at Microsoft's annual financial analyst day on July 30, he said:

"Our license tells you what a netbook is Our license says it's got to have a super-small screen, which means it probably has a super-small keyboard, and it has to have a certain processor and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah."

The "blah, blah, blah, blah, blah," aside, the site TechARP.com had previously reported that Windows 7 Starter Edition will only be allowed to be sold on netbooks with a screen of 10.2 inches or smaller, 1 GB or less of memory, a hard disk of only up to 250GB or a solid-state drive not larger than 64GB, and a single core processor running at a maximum of 2GHz.

At the moment, those are fairly standard specs for a netbook, although some netbooks already sport larger screens, such as ones from Lenovo, Samsung, and Asus. And Intel has announced its "Calpella" platform that could be used to build netbooks --- but the platform is dual core.

Given that hardware always gets more powerful, over time, there will most likely be fewer netbooks that qualify for Windows 7 Starter Edition. Only the lowest-end netbooks will have Windows 7 Starter Edition on them. Microsoft will get much less per Windows license for Starter Edition that it will for more powerful versions of Windows 7, so it has plenty of incentive to get people to move to the higher-end versions of Windows.

So where does the bait and switch come in? System vendors, hand in hand with Microsoft, will most likely advertise low-end devices at low price points, which will include Windows 7 Starter Edition. But once vendors and Microsoft get people's attention, they'll shift them towards higher-end netbooks with more powerful processors, larger screens, and more usable keyboards --- and the more expensive version of Windows 7.

Ballmer all but admitted that strategy. At the financial analyst day, Computerworld reports, Ballmer said:

"It's not just what are our prices -- that's partly in here -- but it's also a function of how well do we do getting, in any segment, people to buy the more expensive offering."

Microsoft has to do something to get Windows to generate more cash. For the first time ever, its revenue from Windows has dropped year over year. Getting netbook owners to buy higher-priced version of Windows 7 is one way to help.

What People Are Saying

No good Windows options left for inexpensive Net-Books.

If Windows starter edition's functionality isn't changed to be at least a bit more functional than its betas, it'll be rendered effectively useless to all but the most clueless, undiscerning, and easy to please droids. The beta version of W7 Starter Edition wouldn't even let you choose a different background wallpaper, or none at all. Without upgrading, the user will be stuck with that vacuously horrid fish wallpaper for the life of the hardware.

I didn't do a complete feature by feature check of what's available in the starter edition when I tested it. But, just the lack of the ability to change any personalization settings is a limitation senseless enough to send many so equipped net-books back to Best Buy/Others for a refund.

Why wouldn't they just upgrade W7 instead of returning the net-book? Because once the buyers contemplate the hassle of upgrading and the extra costs involved, all the savings would be lost. At which point the artificially imposed hardware limitations for net-books would cause them to be wholly worse deals (price-wise) than a more feature complete version of W7 pre-installed on any other net-book/laptop offerings on more competent hardware that aren't so strictly limited by Microsoft's policies.

The result of this scenario, is that the net-book return rates are liable to do a flip-flop. From the Linux equipped net-books being the prevalent models returned, to the Windows 7 equipped models being the one's having the higher return rates.

Really, the only time these so equipped net-books would be even minimally useful (except aforementioned droids), would be for those who want to install a Linux distro as their main net-book OS but still want to retain the W7 starter edition (as a dual-boot or in a Virtual-Machine)as a means to legitimately/legally run the occasional must-have commercial Windows-only applications. So, on the net-books at least, Microsoft will effectively be discounting their Microsoft Tax for Linux users who only need minimal W7 functionality. Ironically, these Linux net-book users might effectively be the primary customers standing in the way of Microsoft ceding the net-book market to Linux in its entirety. Interesting stuff, huh?

Microsoft might just be shooting itself in the foot here with W7 Starter Edition's senseless limitations and its draconian hardware limitations.

Too bad too, because I really hate anything Linux currently offers, and not surprisingly, those I support are also not inclined to use Linux either. (Save your breath Lin-Fanboyz with your "try this or that distro". I'm way ahead of you on that)...

BIOS Flash

You hit on something with the "minimal W7 functionality"...

BIOS flash routines are increasingly Windows only. Boot-to-DOS is gone and flashrom in Linux is all reverse-engineered.

MS could just simply "encourage" that to never change...

M$ can keep their crippled

M$ can keep their crippled OS, Linux has no such restrictions

Limits on the market

My biggest issue is the line between laptops that can run W7 starter and laptops that can't. Since MS dictates how weak the hardware must be for W7, you end up with a situation where there are a bunch of similar models toeing the line, but the next logical step up is much more expensive because it "has" to run the full version of W7.

Since I'm not going to be running W7 ever (to the point of exercising Windows refunds), it means that there will be a sweet spot of price-performance that's completely removed from the market due to these arguably arbitrary and artificial restrictions.

My wife looked at an HP 1033; it's artificially limited right now due to it being available with XP. We don't plan to run Windows on her next machine.

Question of the day...

Will "Starter Edition" refuse to boot if someone adds another stick of RAM?

Nice trick but are people ready to eat it?

Buying W7 Starter netbook is just waste of money. Forget it.

Not Bait & Switch

Upselling is not bait & switch. As long as they can still sell the advertised lesser product, this is just plain old upselling.

Not Bait & Switch

It's worthless anyway because one cannot purchase Starter Edition by itself to install seperately. For us current netbook users, we have to use our XP, Linux or Vista Home basic. It's a tease just to sell shiny new netbooks which users will then most likely upgrade to Home Premium if their NB can use the added features.