Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Jim Taylor's picture
Jim Taylor

The Tech Shrink

An open letter to Steve Jobs: Is the core of Apple rotten?

Dear Steve,

You certainly deserve all the credit and attention you've received in recent years. Apple's rise, fall, and then reemergence is the stuff of corporate legend and has enabled Apple to attain a truly iconic place in the world. You personally have achieved a level of public adoration unprecedented among the geek classes. The Mac personal computer, iPod and iTunes, and, most recently, the iPhone are all testaments to your engineering genius and marketing savvy.

The success of the iPhone alone must be beyond your wildest dreams: 25 million units sold, 24/7 buzz, status symbol and fashion statement. And you must be loving how all of those companies you're fighting in the mobile-technology wars are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at you to make a better iPhone.

People love the Apple story because it represents so much of what makes our country great: entrepreneurial spirit, ingenuity, creativity, innovation, savvy, style, capitalism, marketing and popular culture. Add underdog status (to that behemoth named Microsoft), your charismatic leadership and an inspiring comeback story, and you have all the makings of the great American success story.

Yet it's what's at the core of Apple that troubles me. Beneath the shiny peel, the sweetness of brilliant leadership and fresh popular-culture hipness is a core that looks pretty rotten, with what appears to be a tyrannical leader and a culture that seems to be more closed and secretive than North Korea.

You definitely didn't want anyone looking under the hood of the iPhone. According to reports, Apple argued to the U.S. Copyright Office that "jailbreaking" would lead to a "potentially catastrophic attack" on cyberspace and benefit drug dealers (are you kidding?). But you're a smart guy and saw the writing on the wall. Thinking that if you can't beat 'em, have 'em join you, you turned those hackers and developers into allies by licensing their apps to sell at your online App Store from which, not surprisingly, you make millions of dollars in profits.

You exert an almost-unheard-of level of control over all of your products. The development and release of the iPhone was veiled in a degree of secrecy usually saved for presidents and weapons systems. And you run a tighter PR ship than President Obama did during his campaign. Your exclusive U.S. contract with AT&T appears to be a stroke of financial genius, but it also resulted in less freedom and fewer choices for iPhone buyers.

If all that isn't bad enough, some of your recent behavior really causes me to ask what is going on at the core of Apple. You made Google wait in line for approval of several of its apps for the App Store as if it was one of those developers who works out of his basement, and then-now this shows chutzpah-you rejected some of the apps because they might compete with your own apps or cut into your buddy AT&T's revenues. Then, you change your software to prevent the Palm Pre from accessing iTunes. How does this make you look? Well, just plain petty to me. You're acting like the child taking his ball home because no one will let him play quarterback. As Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia , told the  the NY Times recently,  "There's something unseemly about what Apple is doing. It's very counter to the ideals of openness, which is a concept Apple pioneered in computing." Also, hypocritical given that you encouraged openness in the music industry in 2007. What's good for the goose and all.

My fear is also that you've drunk too much of your own Apple-flavored Kool-Aid. These days, the media is portraying you as a cult-like figure, a messianic leader tending to his flock. Your presentations at the annual Macworld conference feel oddly worshipful. And, strangely, your absences from the conference garner even more attention and, to Apple devotees, portend doom. Rumors of your health and future involvement with Apple are eerily reminiscent of Kim Jong-Il.

When I did a search for "Steve Jobs perfectionist, control freak," do you know how many results I got? Almost seven thousand.  A review of the first few dozen indicated a broad consensus on that point. Having worked with and written about perfectionists and control freaks for many years, it's obvious why you're so successful. But I've also found that these people aren't very happy or at peace because they devote so much time and energy to trying to be perfect and in control (truly futile tasks). I hope your recent health problems will lead you to do some soul searching and make some fundamental leadership and company changes.

Also, consider where you want to take Apple as you head toward your legacy years. What kind of person and leader do you want to be the rest of your career and life? And how do you want people to remember Steve Jobs and Apple?  

Because I'm not the only one who's losing the love for you, Steve. Jason Calacanis wrote a scathing post about you that shares many of my concerns (and several others). People are starting to catch onto you and they will turn on you at some point.

If you stay on your current path, the demise of Apple, seems likely, if not immediate. Such a tightly controlled environment ultimately suffocates all those within and alienates those outside (just look at the USSR). It's ironic that the man who gave us the ground-breaking 1984 ad actually now more resembles the guy on the screen than the runner wielding the sledgehammer.

Walking around the office in jeans and a black mock turtleneck isn't openness. And neither are clever ads or attractive products. All are just the skin of Apple. Openness has to start at the core of Apple, by which I mean you. Openness begins with loosening your grip on Apple just a bit, allowing others, like Google and Palm, to harness your technology for the benefit of all end users, and collaborating on new technology.

Openness promotes new ideas, greater innovation, and feel-good narratives that are actually good for business. And, at a personal level, openness makes people happier, more relaxed, and more fun to be around. Openness is an investment that will pay off with good will, good relationships, and good karma for many years to come. I can't provide a guarantee, but I'm going to suggest that this approach will also have a significant upside financially for Apple in the coming years.

If you'd like to speak further, just call and we can schedule an appointment.

Kind regards,

Jim

Jim Taylor, Ph.D., Psychology, is a corporate consultant, speaker, and author. He hosts a personal blog at drjimtaylor.com.

What People Are Saying

WHY did I sit through

WHY did I sit through reading this article? HOW does this clown actually have his own blog?

i miss the days when only smart people knew how to use a computer and the internet was a wild concept.

is the core of computerworld rotten? seriously.

I did a search that went

I did a search that went something like: apple complete control closed products, and I ended up here reading exactly what has been slowly creeping into my feelings about Apple. Feelings of doom, embarrassment, an uneasy feeling that control at apple is getting out of control. Thanks for the read, it reinforces what is becoming true, that Apple is at a juncture- to keep going down this rabbithole of control or embrace outside tech and become a true leader, like Microsoft.

Sorry Jim, i didn't want to

Sorry Jim,

i didn't want to insult you,
actualy your words was more
painfull for me -like a huge
apple fan...
because in many kind you are right...
Apple did and still do lots of mistakes
if they wouldn't - nobody need to suffer
from Bill-who? fake MAC rip-off OS !!!
If some other company would do so many
mistakes like Apple,it would go bust
long time ago...
but they didn't and thats because of
amazing love of all the A-freaks like us...
that what Apple should never forget...
and give some of this love back in return...
but instead they seems to give a huge F
about what little people want- like this netbook!!!
If some of the big Aps wouldn't be
so arrogant and call it a f...BS
they would not miss the trend today,
make us all more happy
and make lotsa money as well!!!
Also another example :
like every real A-fanatic I have lots of
Apple Stocks,it was always gut to have them,
but for several years its seams like
they give a big F about the shareholders...
some times they remind me on this
funny character from FRIENDS- you remember:
#Joe does not share the food!!!#
But by all the criticism don't forget
nobody want to be associated with
something micro and soft ...
but every body with giga and hard!!!
Keep busy...
Critical spirit avoid a sleeping mind!

This story is written by

This story is written by someone that clearly has limited business knowledge.

Jim, it sounds like your a

Jim, it sounds like your a hater.

Even w/ superior products you still try to find a negative angle on apple. I could care less if steve jobs is or isn't a dick. His products are great and they make my life easier. Apple has bounced back w/ more superior products and a truly innovative phone that shows they are still the ultimate computer originators, not imitators.
Apple earned their place and always had more original ideas and better products. Bill gates "copied" everything and was genius at marketing, but he didnt create anything. His new operating systems crashed on live TV when they did demonstrations. LMAO
Try to imagine what PCs would be like w/o apple. Their original operating system was a hack from the original apple OS. Their latest system is a copy as well. Face it...apple rules, but you can remain in denial. Make you should start complaining about his wife while your at it.

Quote

"Openness promotes new ideas, greater innovation, and feel-good narratives that are actually good for business. And, at a personal level, openness makes people happier, more relaxed, and more fun to be around. Openness is an investment that will pay off with good will, good relationships, and good karma for many years to come."

Who told you this ? Steve Balmer ?

Openness vs. Money

Openness vs. Money

How many phones you sold lately? Microsoft? Zero

Jason Calacanis doesn't want an iPhone! He wants a Zune Phone! Only, well, there isn't one. Sorry.

His Microsoft-only speech wasn't a tirade against Apple, out of his 5 parts, 4 were about the at&t tie-in with the iPhone.

Well, Mr. Taylor, America is still a land of some choice. Mr. Jason Calacanis and *you* may buy whatever product you want. Except, of course, an iPhone on your non at&t provider. Sorry.

Can't get a 426 Hemi in a BMW either. Ain't life a bitch?

Why Apple works as is

If you knew anything about software and support of high tech products, you might better understand why Apple controls the iPhone, iPod and the Macintoshes. There are limits to what one can support, there are problems supporting things others have introduced to your product, and Apple was burned badly when they didn't keep things secret.
when I worked in Silicon valley and Jobs returned to Apple, the move of corporate headquarters led to less instant copying of Apple's ideas by firms like Microsoft. The feeling was the the Apple headquarters had electronic bugs installed by competitors.
what other firm has come up with innovative products recently except Google? Not Dell, not IBM, not HP.... so why are you so down on Apple?

Tech Shrink's Retort

Though a bit painful, I appreciated everyone's ideas in response to my post. A lot of good thoughts and even more passion from all. Without getting specific, I was appropriately corrected or put in my place in a number of comments.

And thanks also to those few who actually liked what I had to say.

I get the impression that many of you think I am an Apple hater. To contrary, I own several Apple products and, if you hadn't been so focused on my criticism of Apple later in my post, you would have seen and felt the great admiration I have and expressed earlier in my post for Steve Jobs and Apple.

Additionally, keep in mind that I intend my posts to be playful and not taken too seriously (which obviously didn't come across very well).

Finally, as the last commenter asks, "why are you so down on Apple?" To show you that I am equal opportunity when comes to being down on companies, check out my recent post, Microsoft Has Lost its Mojo. To twist a well-known adage, I get down when down is due.

So please don't give up on me yet. Give me a few more chances so you can judge whether I may actually have some good things to say or whether you should just click on by my posts