Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


The easiest operating system to update is...

Over the weekend, I decided to see which of the major operating systems would be the easiest to update. The answer may surprise you.

First, I took several of my Windows systems and tried to upgrade them to Windows 7 Ultimate. It was ... interesting.

Coming from Windows XP, I found, as I expected, that there is no easy way to upgrade. The only method is what Microsoft calls a "custom install" and what I call a slash-and-burn install. In the end, you'll have to let the Windows 7 installation DVD delete everything on your hard drive.

Microsoft provides a tool, Windows Easy Transfer (aka migsetup), on the Windows 7 DVD that will transfer files and settings to an external drive. This is a pain in the neck, but it does work. What it doesn't do, however, is transfer programs, fonts, or drivers. Once my Windows 7 was set up, I had to reinstall every last application, font and driver. I couldn't believe that a modern operating system actually made it so hard to upgrade it.

Still, it is from Microsoft, so perhaps I shouldn't be so surprised. What did surprise me was that I found I couldn't update the Windows 7 RC (release candidate) to the RTM (released to manufacturing) version of Windows 7. The only version of Windows that can be upgraded without jumping through hoops is Vista. Even Vista, however, can only be upgraded easily from the same version to another or to Windows 7 Ultimate.

For Linux, I upgraded from Ubuntu 8.10 to 9.04. In stark contrast, Ubuntu was easy to upgrade. There's simply no comparison with Windows. Linux has the undeserved reputation of being hard to use. What a joke! Most users will have a far more difficult time upgrading Windows.


See Computerworld's

I prefer Linux for most desktop uses, but I confess that Mac OS X Snow Leopard is also an easy upgrade. Just like Ubuntu Linux, all you really need to do is put in the DVD, make a few mouse clicks, and go have lunch while it runs. Snow Leopard, on my Mac mini, took just over an hour to install, and about 45 minutes on my MacBook Pro.

Once installed, both Snow Leopard and Ubuntu ran perfectly. That's more than I can say about Windows 7. After installing it, I found that an old Vista networking problem with working with NAS (networked attached storage) was still present and required me to manually adjust an obscure local security setting. Windows is easy? What nonsense!

Linux, it must be said, took less time to install than Mac OS X. But, really, there was no practical difference between Snow Leopard and Ubuntu 9.04 in their ease of installation. So, when it comes to being easy to install, I see it a dead-tie between Mac OS X and Linux. Windows? It's far, far in the back.

But I guess I can't complain too much. I'm sure I'll get to write a few "How to install Windows 7" stories, which is more than I will with either Linux or Snow Leopard. Of course, if you're a Windows user, you'll certainly have a lot more trouble — but hey, it's your dime and your time. Spend them as you wish.

What People Are Saying

enterprise mobility solution

Wow, I never knew that operating system. That's pretty interesting…

mobile software

That's great, I never thought about Unity and operating system to update like that before.

Time between upgrades...

The time between the release of Windows XP and Windows 7 is eight years.

Latest version of Ubuntu is 9.10 released on 23. April this year according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic. Now lets substract 8 years. The first release of Ubuntu was 4.10 (aka "Warty") on 20th january 2004.

So Ubuntu derives from Debian, right? So let's have a look at Debian releases (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-releases.en.html). Try to upgrade Debian 2.2 Potato or Debian 3.0 Woody to Ubuntu 9.10 to keep everything in comparison.

Oh you should try this with MacOS 9.22 and todays Snow Leopard. Have fun :)

"After installing it, I

"After installing it, I found that an old Vista networking problem with working with NAS (networked attached storage) was still present and required me to manually adjust an obscure local security setting. Windows is easy? What nonsense!"

This is arguably not a problem with Windows, but a problem with SAMBA! Just because your NAS can't work with more secure protocols, doesn't make Windows the problem!

OS comparisons

I appreciate the fact that you're open-minded enough to realize that MS isn't the only developer of operating systems, and hasn't been for quite some time. I've been working with Netware, OS/2 LAN Server, Microsoft server OSs, and Linux distributions for 22 years, and reading your articles. It's reassuring to know that you don't settle for the "A or B" comparisons, but take third and sometimes fourth and fifth OS options into consideration.

Right On!

I switched to linux when XP came out and everyone could see the direction M$ was taking.

I am *so* glad. Linux is better than anything M$ has to offer!

Linux rocks!

Linux rocks all right,

Linux rocks all right, especially when trying to attach a late printer or scanner and is especially great for use with Photoshop or any high end photo editors.

Get real!

Really?

So what's the problem with printing and scanning?
I have Xerox Docuprint P12. It works in Ubuntu 5, 6, 7, 8,9.04, 9.10 with RS232 to USB adapter.
On Vista and XP it works only sporadically. Some magic tricks like plug/unplug/plug in another USB get it working in XP/Vista, but linux has no issues with that- it just works.
Have not tried Win 7, do not plan to pay M$ anymore.
So, really -get real.

haha!! are you kidding me!

haha!! are you kidding me! older hardware is brought back to life with linux. and if your using a printer that is so old that linux wont support it, well buddy, its time for you to "get real" and buy a new printer. here's one on newegg for you. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16828113290

also photoshop runs under wine, here you go:
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?appId=17

of corse theres gimp, which is open source and has plug-ins available.

and heres a quick lesson,
it doesnt matter if you have the best tools in the market if you dont even know how to use them.

sometimes having full control over your computer is a big responsibility, and most people cant handle the freedom, you sir, are one of them.

Response to "Here's the problem"

If you are serious about 'professional' quality technical software that is supported on GNU/Linux, then consider QCAD and as mentioned by another respondent VariCad. Both are internationally recognized software applications that - to my knowledge - can read/write to AutoCAD format.

Furthermore, the commercial license version of QCAD was used in part of the engineering project for the "EuroTunnel" that links England to France, and therefore is acknowledged as alternative and probably superior to AutoCAD in many respects.

Include in this "technical' list is Robotics software, applications that control Celestial telescopes used by universities and technical labs, OpenOffice Office suite used by American Library Assoc. etc.,so there is plenty of world class software for Linux.

Your son needs to open his horizons to great technology, which is the preferred platform even for NASA and Boeing.

W. Anderson
wanderson@kimalcorp.org