Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Whapped by WEP: Dangerously defective security still being sold

What if you bought a new Wi-Fi access point today, and then discovered that it uses a 12-year old security technology that vendors have known since 2001 is dangerously insecure?

Insane as it may sound, products like that are apparently still being sold. Online. Right now.

Eight years ago the Wi-Fi Wired Equivalency Privacy (WEP) secure encryption protocol was deemed seriously flawed. Any amateur hacker can break the code and listen into a Wi-Fi session that uses WEP within minutes using software tools readily available on the Web. Five years ago the industry adopted Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) and then moved on to WPA2. So why are resellers still offering WEP products on the Web, with no warnings or disclosures?

This doesn't surprise Mike Horowitz, who blogs about security for Computerworld. He says a huge percentage of Wi-Fi networks are still using WEP. But selling these things without full disclosure borders on criminal. Perhaps these vendors should be held liable for damages.

Consider: Today the FTC issued guidelines for bloggers requiring that they fully disclose when they receive free products or payments from vendors in exchange for reviews. A mommy blogger can be fined $11,000 for not disclosing that a $10 toy sent to her by a manufacturer was sent free of charge, but manufacturers and resellers get to sell dangerously defective Wi-Fi equipment? Something is out of whack here. Perhaps the FTC should also force resellers and manufacturers to slap the equivalent of a Surgeon General's Warning on Wi-Fi equipment that still only supports WEP.

I'm not just talking about shady online discounters. Amazon.com offers the Linksys WCG200 Wireless-G Cable Gateway for $124.99 through partner J&R Music and Computer World. The product description makes no mention of security. To find out that it's an insecure WEP-only device, customers must click on the data sheet link. There, listed under security, are three letters that should give every consumer pause: "WEP." No WPA. No WP2. Just the discredited WEP. Amazon also offers this product through AntOnline, DataVision, ComputerVideo, The Price Pros and other vendors. Two other sites I visited offer refurbished version of the same unit as well, including this unit at Buy.com. Amazon also offers this Belkin unit. The description says it's WEP only. The product manual says WPA or WEP. Which is right?

Unwary consumers could pay $125 or more for what is for all intents and purposes could be a defective product.

The Linksys WCG200 unit is also discontinued, according to Cisco, which owns the Linksys brand.

How I got stuck with WEP

Why do I know this? Because I recently installed a WCG200 wireless cable gateway on my home office network. This device acts as both a cable modem and wireless router. I had the device lying about and decided to replace my cable modem and wireless router with a single, integrated device that uses less energy, saves me a cable modem rental fee from the cable provider and reduces desktop cables and clutter.

I installed it quickly, without paying too much attention. Only later, when I began testing a Kodak wireless printer, did I go back into the administrative console and discover that I had set up WEP security.

Alarmed, I called Cisco, which confirmed that the device only supports WEP and that no upgrade for the device is available. Cisco no longer makes a wireless cable gateway product, according to a sales person. But you can still buy it online.

Grasping at Straws

So what if you have one of these things? I had already returned my cable modem to the cable company for credit and I am loathe to go crawling back. But given that I live next to a college campus, using WEP doesn't seem like a smart idea. So I asked fellow blogger Mike Horowitz for advice.

"You should not use WEP, I suggest a new router," he said.

I tried bargaining. I was pretty sure I already knew the answers but I thought I would give it a shot anyway. I noted that there are a few other security features on the device. For example, I could up the encryption level from 64-bits to 128 bits.

Sorry, Mike said, but any flavor of WEP can be broken.

I tried again. Every computer has a unique MAC address built into the networking hardware. A feature called MAC address filtering lets you only grant access to machines with MAC addresses in your approved list. Surely if I turned on the MAC address filtering feature I could restrict access? A hacker would have to guess the correct address to get in, would they not? There are millions of combinations.

Sorry again, Mike said. "They don't have to guess. MAC addresses are never encrypted when traveling over the air so bad guys can just borrow an allowed MAC address. It's easy to forge a phony MAC address." And don't forget, he said, they can see everything you transmit whether they can access your device to get to the Internet or not - including login names and passwords.

What if I hide? I could turn off the SSID broadcast feature so that people searching for wireless networks wouldn't see my unit.

Strike three. "It can be seen. Lots of software shows networks that are not broadcasting their SSID. They are broadcasting after all," Mike said.

So it appears that what I have here is a boat anchor. I'll want a new Wi-Fi certified unit that has WPA2 security (even WPA2 security can be hacked unless you use a long password, Mike warns).

I have three choices. I could bring back the cable modem from Time Warner and pay the $1 per month rental fee and then add a Wi-Fi router to that. Alternately, I could turn off Wi-Fi feature on the WCG200 and use it only as a cable modem, then add a modern Wi-Fi wireless router. Or I could try to find another integrated unit - the greenest option. For some reason, however, those appear to be a scarce commodity these days. Either way I'll be reading Mike's How to Buy a Wireless Router before I go shopping this week.

What People Are Saying

Comcast NJ makes WEB the default

Why did Comcast make WEP default when they installed Broadband in Wallington NJ? When I got to my father's house I switched him over to WPA - very little assistance. In fact, they did not know what I was calling about and offered to "send a truck". Comcast is the worst. Sadly they don't even change the default password for the router: 198.162.0.1

You could check out

You could check out www.dd-wrt.com and see if your router is supported. If supported, flashing it with this Linux-baseed utility would be an excellent option. DD-WRT is an excellent router interface, and offers more control over security and broadcasting wireless signal strength, among other things.

So, what's the risk?

In a business setting you definitely want something better than WEP encryption. For a business application I hope you are willing to spend more than $150 for the hardware as your business depends on it.

For the home net, WEP may just be enough to keep the local bad guys out. After all, what's the risk your home net will be hacked? Pretty low.

To me the encryption on your network is like the lock on the front door. Any thief with a bit of skill can use a "Bump Key" to crack most door locks. (look it up on YouTube for fun)

Yet, even though the information is openly available on YouTube, most people don't use the technique and your house is reasonably safe.

WEP, though old is about that strong. Just strong enough to discourage your neighbor from piggybacking on your broadband. Nothing more. The determined thief will find another way.

The overall risk is low, very low.

Admittedly, the overall risk with one of the newer encryption methods is lower, but not all that much.

So, what's the risk profile? That's the real question to ask.

Try a Faraday cage

You could put all the wireless devices you want to allow to connect inside a Faraday cage with the questionable wireless router. :) Or use (gasp!) wires.

Article is OK on a topic

Article is OK on a topic well-known and overly discussed. Where you go wrong is venturing into legal matters--"borders on criminal....should be held liable for damages." IMHO it comes nowhere near any criminality and your proposal for damages cinches it as a civil wrong compensable by civil remedies. Your argument that there's a logical imbalance between the mommy blogger and a manufacturer selling WEP only Wi-Fi devices also fails. The blogger writes a review with the clear knowledge that it will likely affect opinion and buying habits, and any conflict of interest should obviously be disclosed--this is well-settled law. A maker of Wi-Fi products is not even required to offer any kind of security (though it would be hard to imagine making a device without any). A product without security of any kind will undoubtedly not sell as well. For example, at one time, cars were not required to have airbags. No doubt the cars with them sold better. But neither government nor industry has seen fit as yet to require Wi-Fi security of any kind. If a major catastrophe directly attributable to the absence of more secure Wi-Fi devices occurs and recurs, the forces of the government and the marketplace will act. Until then, you and Horowitz may be premature in your warnings.

Defective products

These are defective products that are being sold without adequate disclosure. For some reason people in the computer software and hardware business seem to get away with this.

WEP was discredited years ago, yet equipment makers continued to sell products that used it and promoted it as secure encryption in marketing literature when it wasn't. The unit I refer to is two years old. WPA has been around since 2003. The only indication the consumer has that this might be a problem lies in the three-letter spec mentioned in the literature: WEP. Many consumers don't know what that is, nor that it is flawed.

Should a manufacturer be held liable for knowingly selling a product with a flawed security feature? How about when a fix for the problem was readily available?

What you're saying now is

What you're saying now is like a tautology. You're defining these products (without WEP plus defenses) as "defective." Defective in most instances means not performing as the product is supposed to by some accepted standard. A door with one lock is secure and certainly not defective, although a door with several locks may be more secure. But a door with a broken lock is defective. A Wi-Fi device with WEP is not as secure as you would like, but not defective--it works.

You then shift your argument to a "flawed" security feature. The manufacturer has no obligation to offer any security, and the buyer has no obligation to purchase any product s/he deems "defective" or "flawed." Before airbags were required, a safety device now considered basic, many safety conscious consumers still bought cars without them. Cars were not back then "defective" or "flawed" because they didn't have the all of "best" safety features. Presumably from studies, seatbelts, another basic safety feature, save lives; any evidence that WEP only Wi-Fi devices have been the cause of monstrous networking/online calamities? As another commenter far more expert than I noted, the overall risk with the newer encryption methods is lower, "but not by all that much." Before the National Guard will answer your call, there has to be some disaster...

Caveat emptor

Obviously the discontinued wep-only Linksys all-in-one isn't a big seller, hence its being discontinued (and unsold units still on the shelves). But ferpetesake, we have enough legislation and lawsuits. Let the buyer beware.

One more point

Of course wep products are still being produced. There are likely hundreds of thousands of wireless devices out there still churning away from the pre-wpa era.

Not all worries valid?

1) If you are using https, does it matter what security is between your computer and the router? It is end-to-end encrypted anyway.
2) Don't you have protection to allow your computer to connect to a public wireless network? Things like ssh tunneling avoid worrying about insecure links to routers.
3) Even if you get hard security to your router, non https/ssh connections go raw to your ISP - are you sure no one there can hack into your communication?