Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


IT Blogwatch's picture
IT Blogwatch

A Daily Digest of IT Blogs from Richi Jennings

Danger! Microsoft loses T-Mobile Sidekick/Hiptop users' data

Microsoft has lost all users' personal information for the T-Mobile Sidekick service (aka Danger Hiptop). It's just gone, with little hope of recovery. Looks like there was a disk failure in its Danger subsidiary, and no working backups. In IT Blogwatch, bloggers don't know whether to laugh or cry.

By Richi Jennings. October 12, 2009.
(MSFT) (DT) (ETR:DTE)

Your humble blogwatcher selected these bloggy morsels for your enjoyment. Not to mention cutting up old VHS tapes...
 
 
John Paczkowski pokes fun at Microsoft:

In the canon of Microsoft [mis-steps], this may be the most humiliating: A server failure at the company’s Danger subsidiary has wiped out the personal data of a large number of T-Mobile Sidekick users. ... The Sidekick stores contacts, calendar entries, and other key data primarily on Danger’s servers, not locally. That’s a fine strategy when the information backed up in multiple redundancy RAID configurations.
...
Microsoft hasn’t yet said what caused the failure. ... Nor has the company said why it doesn’t have a copy of Sidekick user data. ... It’s hard to imagine ... a reasonable explanation ...  for unrecoverable data loss. ... This is an ugly embarrassment for Danger and Microsoft and one that will probably cost them the trust of Sidekick users. Sadly, Danger seems to have lived up to its name.more


Om Malik likens it to a 3270:

Danger’s service works in a very simple fashion. The devices are in constant communication with a server which does everything from checking email to fetching web pages and maintaining contact with all the folks we know on [IM]. It also keeps copies of other communications (such as text messages), address books and calendars. It stores photos on its servers as well.
...
What we have is a device that is a combination of a cell phone and an almost dumb terminal.more


Jason Kincaid offers a crumb of comfort:

That means that any contacts, photos, calendars, or to-do lists that haven’t been locally backed up are gone. Apparently if you don’t turn off your Sidekick ... you can salvage what’s currently stored on the device ... Microsoft/Danger is describing the likelihood of recovering the data from their servers as “extremely low”.
...
This goes beyond FAIL, face-palm, or any of the other internet memes we’ve come to associate with incompetence. The fact that T-Mobile and/or Microsoft Danger don’t have a redundant backup is simply inexcusable. ... Microsoft acquired Danger for $500 million in February 2008.more


Seth Weintraub commiserates:

Customers will be happy to know that Tmobile is offering a free month of data (not a free month of service, just the $20 unlimited data plan) for all of their information. I really hope a lot of Sidekick users used the Intellisync software that pushes data to the desktop and would have backed their data up.

T-Mobile has halted the sale of new Sidekicks. All models are now showing "temporarily out of stock" on the company's website.more


Ed Hunsinger asks, "How did this happen?"

Currently the rumor with the most weight is as follows: Microsoft was upgrading their SAN ... and had hired Hitachi to come in and do it for them. Typically in an upgrade like this, you are expected to make backups of your SAN before the upgrade happens. Microsoft failed to make these backups for some reason. ... Microsoft should know better. So Hitachi worked on upgrading the SAN and something went wrong, resulting in it’s destruction.
...
We’ve heard this from what appears to be several sources and it seems to hold weight. Needless to say it all boils down to one thing: Microsoft did not have a working backup. ... The head of the mobile division (and person in charge of what’s left of Danger) is Roz Ho, who has been at Microsoft for 18 years. You would think she’d know something about how to run a business.more


Chris Ziegler ponders the impact for the carrier:

The coming weeks are going to be trying times for ... T-Mobile, a sideline player in this carnage that ultimately still shoulders responsibility for taking users' cash month after month. ... We're betting that heads are going to roll at both of these companies, formal investigations are going to be waged, users are going to be compensated in big ways, lawsuits are going to be filed, and textbooks could very well be modified to make sure that lessons are learned.
...
Why there weren't any backups -- even older ones -- that could've been used as a restore point is totally unclear, so we're hoping Microsoft has the stones to come clean for the benefit of an entire industry that wants to understand how to make sure this never happens again.more


Tim Anderson asks, "What next?"

People are drawing a variety of conclusions, the most obvious being either that the cloud can never be trusted, and/or that Microsoft can never be trusted. Of course there is no such thing as total data (or any other kind of) security, but risks can be minimized, and in the absence of nuclear war, earthquake or volcanic eruption this looks inexcusable.
...
The company is promising an update [Monday]. Personally I doubt that the data is really irrecoverable, knowing a little about what data forensics can achieve, but it may be economically irrecoverable. Still, the best thing Microsoft could do would be to announce that it can get the data back after all. Failing that, we need to understand as much as possible about what went wrong so that we can make our own judgment about what to conclude.more


So what's your take?
Get involved: leave a comment.

 
 
And finally...

 

Richi Jennings, your humble blogwatcher   Richi Jennings is an independent analyst/consultant, specializing in blogging, email, and security. A cross-functional IT geek since 1985, he is also an analyst at Ferris Research. You can follow him as @richi on Twitter, or richij on FriendFeed, pretend to be richij's friend on Facebook, or just use good old email: itblogwatch@richij.com.

 
 
Don't miss out on IT Blogwatch:

What People Are Saying

Guess that's why it's called...

Danger.

I owned a T-Mobile MDA for

I owned a T-Mobile MDA for several years before upgrading to my G1 a year ago. I never trusted T-Mobile's own email system (tmomail@ whatever) and always used my company-provided email account.

Are you saying that the Sidekick is significantly different from the MDA, and that there is no way to independently backup or sync the data on the Sidekick with a PC? I can't believe this is true, and have to say that users bear a responsibility to protect their own data.

SidekickLX

I feel as if this "loss of information" is very unprofessional.I had over 600 contacts and 30+ notes saved,alonq with my personal emails that I cannot retrieve. I know that the information can be retrieved but due to how much it will cost the company they would rather refrain from doing so.$40 off of one month's bill is not enough compensation even though I am grateful for that much.In my opinion all of the data should be restored or we should receive a months free or an upgrade.!

End User Responsibilities

Granted, "cloud" services providers are painting rosy pictures of how dependable their systems are, but no sales pitch should ever sway individuals from performing their due diligence, which is to backup their important data. Two decades worth of common computer system knowledge has taught everyone to do this.

Your car may have a spare tire, but it's up to you to ensure that the tire's air pressure is maintained.

Been thinking

of providing online storage (as a small developer), but if these guys can't do it, my fears are realized.

Oh wait, MS was involved. There is still hope that MySQL Replication and Linode can easily handle this.

"economically irrecoverable" ?!?!

Inconceivable! What, did anyone else experience an EMP attack (to your sole TWO servers)?

MS Danger Sidekick loss of data

Many of the posters anticipate a substantial blood letting at Danger/T-mobile. While a few worker-bees may get the axe, it is unlikely that any meaningful change will occur. Balmer won't be impaled on a stake outside of the Redmond HQ; the head of Deutsche Telekom won't stop getting head...

Nothing matters except gross customer attrition. If they lose 30% of their remaining customer base, then maybe they'll switch to cheaper cigars in the board room. Even a 5% loss of customers seems highly unlikely, and 5% of T-Mobile won't even register on the radar's of the corporate parents.

This is a manifestation of the "grow too big to let fail" syndrome: our asleep-at-the-wheel anti-trust regulators have allowed companies to grow so large that they truly and genuinely don't care about events like this. It's just noise to them. And we peons look like ants (or worse, gnats) to the executives.

Wall Street could whore-out campfire girls and the regulators wouldn't do anything. Losing T-mobile user data is comparatively inconsequential.

Economics 101

You must have missed the Civics and Economics classes where they explained about how the free market system works, probably attending the pro-Chinese or pro-Eastern Block rally that day.

By far, Microsoft's offerings are not the only "cloud" services available, nor the only mobile handheld data device services, so your knee-jerk anti-capitalist rhetoric is unfounded in this specific instance. And overall, your slanted view that businesses don't care about customers is extremely naive. Businesses understand quite well where their bread is buttered and by whom. You're too indoctrinated to recognize that process as it happens every day.

As you indicate, a severe loss of trust by consumers, such as should be elicited by this event, will have significant economic impact on T-Mobile's Sidekick operations. Without consumer trust in their name brand, a business can't sell its products, and will be forced to change or die. How many prospective new smartphone buyers do you expect are likely to consider T-Mobile after this incident? For a while, probably none, provided that they understand what happened to current customers. Cell phone carriers live or die on churn, and this mis-step will cost T-Mobile lots of churn.

But, you might also want to consider the end-users' part in this debacle. Those who properly backed-up their devices as recommended in the manual will have few problems.

Sidekick users were Blindsided!

This is absolutely unacceptable! Sidekick Customers should receive a full refund of all moneys paid to t-mobile as a result of their incompetence and contractual failure. This is of course in addition to damage compensation for lost data. There has been very little to no communications with customers. Calls go unanswered except for a recording. The website posting has not been updated x 2 days. Customers deserve a status update frequently regarding their business and personal data retrieval progress. The data can be retrieved. The question is will t-mobile invest the resources to do it?? Unbelievable and inexcusable to say the least!

Sidekick Users Inept?

Perhaps Sidekick users are unaware that man-made systems and devices fail, and that backups of important data is a bare basic end-user responsibility for any electronic system? Sure, T-Mobile and Microsoft are at fault on their end, but shame on you if you trust completely in any system with your critical data. Ever heard the saying, "If you want it done right, do it yourself?" Best check your PC to see if you've backed it up within the last 30 days. I venture to guess "No."

T-Mobile promises Sidekick customers an update today

T-Mobile has promised an update to customers today. Let's see whether that happens and, if so, how substantive it is.