Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


ARMing desktop Linux

For a brief time in 2008, Linux actually owned a segment of the desktop industry: netbooks. When netbooks first showed up, they ran only Linux. Microsoft panicked and brought XP back from the dead, offering it for next to nothing to netbook vendors and thus successfully fighting off the Linux challenge.

 

That was then -- this is now. Today, Linux netbooks are still popular, though not as much as they once were. ARM-based netbooks, are on their way and, since these systems can't run Windows, Linux has the potential market all to itself. The real question is: will PC vendors choose to offer low-cost, less than $200 netbooks?

ARM Holdings, the company behind the ARM Cortex processor family, wants to see this happen. It's not that ARM sees a big future for itself as a desktop/laptop processor company. According to Simon Segars, executive vice president and general manager of ARM's physical IP division, ARM decided to enter this market mainly to counter Intel's moves in the mobile phone market.

"We are more worried about Intel encroaching into the high-end of smartphones, than we are about netbooks," said Segars. "If ARM is successful in devices like netbooks, it will be a nice incremental revenue for the company."

This is not exactly the kind of enthusiastic support Linux fans or vendors would like to see.

The latest iteration of the ARM Cortex dual-core A9 processor, which runs at 2GHz, is fast enough to go up against Intel's netbook processor of choice, the Atom. With its lower cost and low power consumption -- less than two watts -- the 2GHz Cortex is ideal for low-cost netbooks.

That is, if anyone will build them. Freescale has the silicon necessary to take the ARM processors and turn them into netbooks. Pengatron, a Taiwanese OEM, is the only company I know of that actually ships ARM and Linux powered netbooks.

It's rather annoying. With the Linux netbook threat mitigated, Microsoft is re-closing the door on XP as fast it can; if Microsoft has its way, the only netbooks you'll be able to buy are deliberately crippled systems with Windows 7 Starter Edition.

Don't believe me? I quote Microsoft's Steve Ballmer: "Our license tells you what a netbook is. Our license says it's got to have a super-small screen, which means it probably has a super-small keyboard, and it has to have a certain processor and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah."

That's so Microsoft. Once the company feels like it's on top, it immediately start dictating to the market how things are going to be from now on. With Linux still around, though, it doesn't have to be that way.

I think though there is a market for full-powered netbooks at a $200 price point, and that means Linux. Ubuntu already runs on ARM, and I expect Google's Chrome operating system to run on ARM-powered systems.

It's that last option that offers desktop Linux its best chance for not just a come-back, but a real shot at becoming an important desktop operating system. I see a $199 ARM-based netbook with Google's name on it and Linux in the engine room selling well. I'd buy it. More important, I can see millions of users, much to ARM's surprise, buying one. Here's hoping it happens.

What People Are Saying

Even if MS maintains

Even if MS maintains domination, they wont be able to sustain themselves in the long run. Imagine being able to buy a whole computer for less than $100, then having to buy the OS. How much will you pay for it?

orders

I work for a large distribution importer, the only problem I have had with ARM systems is filling the orders!

I know the manufacturers of ARM systems are struggling to keep up with demand, I'm being back-ordered.

As for the Linux thing, I'm no computer guy just a salesmen, the reason XP is on the systems is that MS sold XP super cheap as long as it was installed on all systems sold. Thats why you can't find Linux netbooks.

I have seen it as low as $7.00 per license. Before MS took these steps MOST of the netbooks I sold had no OS on them or came with Linux.

Think about it, if your a manufacturer and you sell 10,000 netbooks at $250.00 and half are windows based systems it's better to pay $7.00 a copy for all of them then $80.00 a copy for half.

When I see the "MS takes over netbooks" headlines I have to laugh, knowing the truth.

Yet since MS Windows is available -

have sales gone up or down? Were more people buying netbooks before or after Windows was available?

I suspect sales went up considerably after Windows was made available. Do you have real numbers?

Note, you said that you are being back ordered. That's not people buying Linux based netbooks I'd bet.

Pengatron?

Did you mean Pegatron?

I'd like ARM with Ubuntu

I'm interested in:
* ARM CPU
* Ubuntu-UNR + Sugar
* 1G RAM expandable
* open BIOS
* Pixel Qi screen
* SSD >= 16G
* competitively high battery life but low mass
* price < US$200

not sure if that SSD will be

not sure if that SSD will be possible, at least not in the price range, without compromising any speed gained from the CPU...

we like to think that any SSD will be faster then a HDD, but thats sadly not true. You can have a cheap (but slow) ssd, or you can have a expensive (but fast) ssd...

Fast forward one year

Oct 14th, 2010.

It will still be the "Year of the linux desktop".
Microsoft will still be the dominant client operating system provider. You will still be reading these tired arguments why you should be using something else.

In the meantime people have actually used their PC's to be productive. Isn't an operating system a productivity tool? Why don't we focus on that?

How terrible is the thought that your operating system doesn't really matter?

The operating system matters

The operating system matters as long as industry de-facto standard software like MS Office make them matter.

I would happily buy an MS Office for Linux license, but Microsoft does not give me this choice.

How abt Oo?

OpenOffice doesn't cut it for you?

sadly, ms office is more

sadly, ms office is more then just a collection of programs, there is also the tie-ins with sharepoint, exchange, as well as the potential that the office have a whole host of stuff built around VBscript.

in essence, ms office these days is a RAD...