Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


The new must-have gadget is a house

Team Canada's House

A visit to the Solar Decathlon on the National Mall this week has renewed my faith in the future. Part of this feeling comes from the inventive and eye-opening use of technology in building solar houses, but most of it is due to the enthusiasm and smarts of the students who did the work.   

University teams have built 20 solar powered houses for this U.S. Department of Energy sponsored competiton. The houses were reassembled on the Mall for display and judging on their use of technology, design and other attributes.

The structures meld information technology with control systems in a way that turns the house into an adaptive machine: an integrated device that collects and produces measurable data on electric use by circuit, as well as water, air and humidity conditions. It gives an occupant understanding and control of his environment.

In these houses, everything matters.  Shades and blinds, for instance, are critical in control systems because of their role in temperature regulation and energy storage. There is no battery storage; instead, inventive materials and techniques are used to direct light, in the case of a Canadian entry, to heat-absorbing salt-hydrate packets under the floor boards.  Web base apps, also adapted for iPhone in these models, allow for remote adjustments.

The homes are within range of affordability. It cost the team of students from Santa Clara University $550,000 to build their 800 square-foot house, the maximum size allowed. They believe their home can be mass produced for $300,000. Land and development would add to that, but no utility bill will mean savings of hundreds of dollars a month in many regions, especially the Northeast, burdened by excessively high electric cost and dependence on oil for heat.

Solar panels have a life of about 25 years, but the cost are dropping and technology is improving so by the time an upgrade is needed a panel replacement effort may be little burden.

The houses are beautifully designed. Team Ontario, comprised of students from the University of Waterloo, Ryerson University, and Simon Fraser University demonstrated that it is possible to build a energy efficient home in snowy regions. Their house, a magnificent glass cube, loft-type structure, produces double the amount of power it needs. [A Web app demo displays the usage/cost.]

But most impressive aspect of the Solar Decathlon are the students, among them, Preet Anand, engineering and physics major at Santa Clara University and the water systems and digital communications lead on the project, and Lauren Barhydt, the Canadian team's program manager, and a graduate student in architecture at the University of Waterloo. Both took the time to explain the features of their work.

The enthusiasm and optimism of these students about our potential to solve one of our greatest problems is infectious and renewing. If you visit the Solar Decathlon, which runs through Saturday, you may be rewarded with a really good feeling about our shared prospects and a new "must have" item for your list.

Note: The winner will be decided Friday and I'll be updating via Twitter @dcgov

What People Are Saying

Please explain...

-- potential to solve one of our greatest problems

Please explain what one of our greatest problems
is supposed to be? Don't tell me you are
referring to the non-Science being professed by
know nothing zealots like Gore?

Our energy issues could have been solved long ago
with nuclear power, but the same people whining
about "saving the planet" were also responsible
for preventing from us from effectively developing
a sound nuclear power policy.

Affordable - Really?

Your affordable house would cost $375 sq/ft. That does not seem affordable to me considering most houses run $80-$150 sq/ft now.

re: affordable

Rice University built a house that cost $140,000. It's a little smaller and includes less automation. The examples cited were more higher-end in design, materials and technology.

That said, in the DC area, where I live, a single family house inside the Beltway will cost $300++. If you drive an hour out houses in the $100,000-200,000 range are abundant, thanks to the bubble crash.

The larger point is that it is possible to build a house that produces more energy than it uses, and that these technologies can be retrofitted and still deliver benefit.

What these student projects are telling us is that alternative energy approaches deserve thoughtful consideration. Or, we can continue to live in houses that are dependent on electric rates, oil and natural gases prices and the Middle East. Any square foot calculation ought to take those costs into consideration as well.

The future

How long have we heard, "The technology is getting cheaper, and it is improving." One of these groups spent $1.2 million on a double-wide-trailer-sized home. Wow! Just think in 20 years we could have an 800 square foot house that only cost $300,000 in today's dollars. Hey! I can buy that right now in LA, for a fixer upper in a really bad neighborhood. If we really want to do something "smashing", how about putting the $700 billion we wasted on "stimulus" into a 5 year project to move to Hydrogen powered vehicles. Bet it would happen then, and at least we would get something for the money!

The future

>How long have we heard, "The technology is getting cheaper, and it is improving."<

What part of that statement isn't true?

I don't know where you live

I don't know where you live that $300-500k for 800 sq. ft. is affordable! Yikes! Around here, 1,600 sq. ft. is $100-150k typically. Yes, utilities will be lower on these new homes, but it's a lot easier to pay more per month for utilities than to get a loan for 4x as much!