Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Amir Lev's picture
Amir Lev

Security Levity

Web filtering internationally, part 1: China

As well as talking about how different cultures view spam, I also wanted to talk about how Web filtering needs to behave differently, depending on the culture.

So, this week on Security Levity... how China views Web filtering.

It should be no surprise that the Chinese government is sensitive about Chinese flagcertain forms of speech. We in the West may not like it, but that's the reality today.

One point of view is that China practices "abhorrent" state censorship, and that the economic reform started by Deng Xiaoping is just another form of anti-Western, Marxist ideology. An alternative point of view is that Chinese society is on a journey, in transition from its own unique form of Marxism -- "Maoism" -- to a free and open society.

This debate aired recently in the technology world, when it emerged that Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft acceded to Chinese government requests to block certain search terms and results in their search engines. It caused some controversy in the West: the debate mainly centering around the question of whether it's better to work inside the Chinese system, or to stand outside.

We can seek to encourage change in the Chinese government's way of thinking either by isolating the People's Republic from our technology, or by positively motivating their transition to open, democratic freedoms -- in the hope of encouraging change from within. The reality is that, in order to do business in China today, Web filtering products -- such as those produced by Commtouch's licensees -- need to have a different philosophy than they do in the West.

In the West, Web filters prevent users from downloading malicious content or "wasting" time on Facebook; but in China, there are additional considerations. If a vendor wants to sell a web filter in China, the product must first gain government approval.

Solutions are expected to be able to block additional, specific types of content. The biggest emphasis is on blocking Falun Gong Web sites, and other sites that are usually classified as "religious" in nature. (Falun Gong has been a proscribed organization since 1999, along with other so-called "heterodox religions" and "evil cults".)

I don't really want to add to the debate about state censorship in this blog post; we don't really have the space to open that can of worms. But whichever way you look at it, the fact remains that the Chinese culture is, as I said previously, very different from the culture in North America or Europe. Web filtering is just another example of these huge differences.

Here's the underlying issue: the Chinese government's definition of "Web threat" is different from yours and mine. Vendors can either work with the state -- helping their transition to a free, open, capitalist democracy -- or they can refuse to do business in a country whose laws they disagree with. As ever, feel free to add your comments.

At Commtouch, we don't make end-user products: our partners license our technologies to build into their solutions. So our job is to choose to allow vendors who integrate our Web filtering engine to comply with these and other counties' laws. We do this by being careful to categorize Web sites in such a way that our OEM partners can expose the functionality to their customers -- if they think that's appropriate.

 
This has been the first in an series of posts about how different cultures view web filtering. In a few weeks, I plan to talk about Iran and other Islamic states that practice Sharia law. Let me know if there are other parts of the world that you're particularly interested in.

I want to make this an interactive place: where I can answer questions and cover topics that you suggest. Feel free to add comments and ask Amir!

Amir Lev is the CTO, President, and co-founder of Commtouch (NASDAQ:CTCH), an e-mail and Web defense technology provider. MORE...

What People Are Saying

It's the CCP, not Chinese people or culture who wants censorship

While your posting makes an interesting argument, it also seems to be based on some false assumptions, especially the idea that the authoritarian Chinese Communist Party which rules China somehow chooses to censor because of Chinese culture rather than to keep its hold on power.

There are certainly differences between Chinese culture and Western culture, but when you follow developments related to the Chinese internet closely, it becomes clear that a key constituency pushing for less web-filtering are none other than Chinese users - 'netizens' as they call themselves.

A website put up recently to commemorate the fall of the Berlin Wall is the latest example of this phenomenon. Twitter postings from Chinese people calling for CCP leader Hu Jintao to "Tear Down this Firewall" now dominate the site (Incidentally, the CCP's response has been to block the site, meanwhile these Twitter postings are only really able to be posted by Chinese who know how to use proxy technology to circumvent the firewall b/c Twitter is often blocked).

Here's the link - it's quite fascinating: http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/10/chinese-twitterers-mr-hu-jintao-tear-down-the-great-firewall/

I hope you and your readers find this comment helpful. Chinese culture and people carry so much wisdom and profound lessons for the world, but we need to be careful not to equate that with the CCP, whose leaders' main priority remains monopoly over political power. In many ways, groups like Falun Gong are much more authentically Chinese than the Party...that's why it's so afraid of them.

Yes, 'culture' not quite the right word

You're absolutely correct to say that it's the state that requires this filtering support, not the people. And this is exactly what I'm saying in the original post.

However, there's a couple of places where I wrote 'culture' in a way that's distracting -- the word has too many meanings. Perhaps 'country' or 'location' might be better words to have used. Thanks for the feedback!

It's sad that you think by

It's sad that you think by selling technological devices to China, you would also be selling "transition to a free, democratic society". Look, I am a Chinese and I happen to have my own values and my own vision of what my country should be. I don't worship Jesus and I don't give a damn about the ideals of the founding fathers. Democracy can rot in a corner for all I care. I read Confucius and Sunzi and Xunzi. So take your cash and kindly refrain from things that are not your business, or leave the market. Seriously, you must be incredible dense to believe that I want to, and will, buy your values along with your products.

WHATTA HIPPO-CRIT

Why you still in America then? China is just like America in the '80s when people were segregated. So what if you read Confucius and Sunzi and Junji...obviously you don't get their message! Move back to Japan pipsqueak since our PRODUCTS ain't good enough.

Cool it, please

I'd prefer we not have that sort of hateful or mean-spirited comment. If you're in any doubt about what's appropriate, please read Computerworld's comments policy.

I'd point out the obvious errors in your reply, but I suspect I'd only be feeding a troll.

Things don't always happen the way we think they will

Things don't always happen the way we think they will. For instance:

In 1949 China kicked out all the western missionaries and now their are more Christians as a percentage of the population than when there were western missionaries.

The USA banned exporting modern computers to Communist countries and now you have to look real hard to find a computer that is not imported from China.

I think God has a sense of humor.

It's sad that you think Amir

It's sad that you think Amir was arguing for the notion that selling technology to China helps it become more democratic. I think he made it pretty clear that he's not arguing the case one way or the other.

(And I'm guessing from his name and location, that Amir Lev doesn't worship Jesus, either)

I disagree with you

In the west, it is same thing. No matter internet, mail, phone, all are controled and monitored by some department from goverment.

I agree with you

Who can tell us the truth in Iraq, in Pakistan, in Afghanistan? How many people is dead in the war? What is the deal in the war?

CNN? BBC? Obama? NO, they never will do that.

The "free" in the west is a feint. It is same thing.

that's exactly correct. the

that's exactly correct. the media in the west tells us what the government wants, but not what we want to know i.e the 'truth'.