Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Gartner: IT already has its head in the cloud

All the world's a cloud, it seems, at Gartner's IT Expo this week - and attendees at the show, who arrived in strength this week, are listening. More than 5,000 people are here, everyone's focused on business, not the economy, and cloud computing is clearly on the radar.

This morning Gartner released its list of most strategic technologies for IT in 2010. Number one: Cloud computing, which everyone agrees is still far from mature. Cloud's impact is infused into discussions in sessions on many topics, and several focus explicitly on private and public cloud architectures.

Gartner defines cloud computing broadly as "A style of computing where scalable and elastic IT-related capabilities are provided 'as a service' to customers using Internet Technologies." In other words, on demand compute services, delivered from shared system infrastructure (storage, processor), application infrastructure (databases, middleware) or full blown applications, as a metered service.

Gartner contends that enterprises are unwittingly building the foundations for their own private cloud services as they continue to build out virtual infrastructure. As such in choosing a vendor they're committing themselves to a path that may have unforseen consequences down the road. Most organizations can't see past the immediate value - consolidation and management efficiencies, and make decisions on that alone, says analyst Tom Bittman. As use models evolve and resources are pooled, tools such as live migration and Distributed Resource Scheduler are providing the substrate on which cloud computing services will be delivered, he says.

His advice: Keep that in mind as you choose virtaulization options, since you'll be locked into methodologies and tool sets down the road, when it comes time to consider implementing a private cloud.

Eventually, IT will become a service provider, analyst Carl Claunch. But Gartner's infamous "troth of disillusionment" still looms. According to Gartner's own predictions, mainstream adoption of the technology is still several years away.

What People Are Saying

pc reapri

why is it getting hard to find good computer tech around long beach, ca. I have check http://www.elitebuyer.com and http://www.window7tech.com and http://www.ezsurfcebu.com and they all have very high price to fix my computer.

Definition of Cloud Computing

Defining the latest & greatest in the Computing World!

Obvious

Gartner seems always be the best stating the obvious, but then, maybe it is needed? IT has always had that problem, selecting a technology just from technology point of view instead of thinking business or next year.

Cloud (what a new buzzword, no!) has existed a long, long time, what's so difficult? The problem comes more from how products / providers try to lock companies to one (theirs!) technology. It isn't (shouldn't be) a problem for large corporations, they can do / mandate their own technology but smaller and inexperienced can't.

I wouldn't agree that cloud computing isn't mature but I would say it's usage is far from mature! Cloud - think for example if the "cloud" would be Tandems (HP NonStop) network all over - it's a cloud very easy to use, secure, non-stop (excluding network problems), all to use resources anywhere is just to map them to your own. Has worked 30 years now. Or if the systems (at least the interfaces) would be written something like Erlang - easiest thing in world to use a "cloud". Or how JIT (just in time) manufacturing already in 80's had manufacturing in one country, used resources in several other, changed the "cloud" almost daily when the requirements even for one order changed, etc. Or do you think that an insurance company executed all their global money / banking transactions in their own infrastructure / systems when it was so easy to use banking services all over the world? Or an airline ticket office selling tickets for all flights in the world but only had a couple of terminals and maybe a mini of their own? And so on. So, it is partially a technology problem but mostly willingness to use / enhance the existing technology instead of paying to hype, marketing buzzwords, vendor lock up, whatever. Common sense still has to be somewhere there!