Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Five Linux alternatives to Windows 7

All the computing world hype this week has been about Windows 7: Cheap Windows 7; Microsoft's future rides on Windows 7; etc., etc. What what if you're not that excited about Windows 7? After all, it's still as insecure as ever, and upgrading from XP to Windows 7 is a major pain. So if you want, or are going to be forced by your aging PC, to move to another operating system, why not give Linux a try?

As I explained recently in the IT World feature "How to give Linux a try" there are lots of ways to sample Linux without jumping through elaborate hoops to make your PC a dual-boot Linux and Windows system or converting your PC altogether to Linux. If any of those sampling experiences persuade you that Linux is for you, or if you're ready to take the plunge, here are five great Linux distributions for you.

Before jumping into my list, I must say that, alas, Google Chrome didn't make the cut. Sources at Google tell me that Chrome — the operating system, not the browser — will be coming out very soon, but it isn't yet ready. Gosh, a company that waits until a product is ready to be revealed before releasing it! If only Microsoft had done that few years back with Vista. But on with the list.

Fedora

Fedora is Red Hat's community Linux distribution, and it's a winner. It's also a cutting edge distribution. You'll find new features in the forthcoming Fedora 12, like kernel memory management via KSM (kernel samepage merging), that are may be a little too bleeding edge for some users. I like Fedora, but its target audience is Linux experts, not Linux newcomers.

MEPIS

MEPIS isn't that well known a desktop distribution, but it should be. This Debian-based distribution doesn't have the newest features — it still uses the KDE 3.5.x desktop — but it's as stable as bedrock and runs fast and well on older hardware. I've been a MEPIS user for years, and while I review every major (and many of the minor) Linux distributions every year, I always find myself coming back to MEPIS. It's the most dependable Linux desktop I've ever used, and I suspect I'm going to continue using it for many years to come.

Mint

Mint doesn't get a lot of press either, but this Ubuntu-based distribution has a lot of fans. It's easy to see why. In addition to all of Ubuntu's goodness, Mint has browser plug-ins, media codecs, DVD playback, and Java and other proprietary-but-handy parts built in. While you can't get Mint pre-installed on a notebook like you can with Ubuntu and SUSE, its developers are working on making it OEM (original equipment manufacturer)-friendly. I won't be surprised if I see at least one vendor offering pre-installed Mint over the next few months.

OpenSUSE

OpenSUSE, like Fedora, is also a major distributor's community Linux. In this case, Novell is the company behind this distro. But unlike Fedora, openSUSE tends to be less bleeding edge and more stable. It also includes software like Mono, which brings .NET programs to Linux, along with other Windows-friendly software. Free-software purists hate this and so tend to avoid Novell and openSUSE. Personally, I have little problem with that, and I like openSUSE a lot. The latest version, openSUSE 11.2, is almost ready to go. I'm not ready to review it quite yet, but I can tell you already that it's a winner.

Also, if you're looking for PCs for business, Novell is the only company that offers a Linux desktop, SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop), with all the enterprise support trimmings and Windows domain and AD (Active Directory) compatibility. If I were running a business today, my desktops would probably be running SLED.

Ubuntu

I recently tested a late beta of Ubuntu 9.10, and I really liked it. It's fast and has great support, and you'll soon be able to buy it (or earlier versions) already pre-installed from vendors like Dell and System76. If you're the kind of person who just wants to buy a PC, boot it up and go, pre-installed Ubuntu is the best option.

So if you're not that excited about Windows 7, remember, you do have free, secure and — in some ways — better alternatives. If you want to know more about the Linux desktop, and you happen to be in the Orlando Florida area, I'll be speaking about the Linux desktop this Saturday, October 24th, at the Florida Linux Show. I look forward to seeing you there.

What People Are Saying

Five Linux alternatives to Windows 7

I'm a Microsoft Windows Victim. I'm tired of the abuse I've received from them. I dumped IE for Chrome and it's been such a rewarding experience. Chrome has never gone down on me.

I am now at a point where I have Microsoft Phobia. Yes i hear all the plus's and minus's for W 7 but my fear is so strong I fear being raped again.

I'm now searching for alternatives to W7 and it'll either be one of the above Linux options or I'll go Apple. Many of my friends have gone Apple and describe in the same terms I describe Google Chrome.

MS have forgotten the golden rule of looking after customers. They want to create a search engine to rival Google but forget that their customer satisfaction is so low that people won't change.

Where the Linux based systems miss out is support at a personal level. I'd love to ring my computer company and have them look after a linux based system on my machine. That service doesn't exist here and i would suggest if someone could do it they'd find a huge stream of customers abandoning MS.

That's my thoughts.

These posts are fascinating,

These posts are fascinating, a real ranting and raving religious war between end users. All that energy expended by home users and hobbyists, when, as some Windows proponent said: Who cares?

Microsoft couldn't care less. Their revenue is driven by the corporate/enterprise world and not the junky little "home edition" operating systems they've strong-armed PC vendors into bundling with their machines.

Marketing. It's what made Jack Daniel's, McDonald's, Nike and Microsoft what they are today. And without its incumbency and billions of dollars spent on marketing, enterprises would have gradually phased out Microsoft platforms over the past decade.

Microsoft never takes its eye off the ball. Some find it ironic that it focuses the vast majority of its resources on sales and marketing while the integrity of its products take a back seat.

This irony is mirrored in the abysmal Microsoft operating systems that are intentionally under-scrutinized internally so that they inherently require the most ridiculous framework of patching in the history of computer science.

Each new "Patch Tuesday" does more harm to enterprises than all the malicious software and exploits ever released in the wild. Existing mission-critical applications are broken, and patching policies which previously denied installation to certain Microsoft applications are subverted (IE 8, Silverlight and Bing come to mind).

Like a technological McCarthyism, the corporate world must stay in step with Microsoft's patching protocols or supposedly risk the financial security of its own businesses. Absurdly, the root of the problem is Microsoft but with the barrage of fear mongering and media glitz, no one wants to cry out against The Emperor's New Clothes.

And for all this chest thumping about reboots and how much money Quicken kept out of the clutches of the IRS, enjoy your operating systems and applications. Just don't think you're helping to chart the destiny of the desktop; Microsoft has its own agenda.

Ubuntu and ITunes

Do you know if it's possible to run Itunes on Ubuntu nowdays?
If so, this will be a perfect OS for my childrens computers.

Install itunes on ubuntu

You can't install iTunes on ubuntu (or any other linux distro). With wine it's possible to install an older version of iTunes but it will be buggy.

The best media player for ubuntu is amerok. You won't be able to play protected iTunes files though.

Haven't tried installing

Haven't tried installing itunes on ubuntu.

You can install 'Wine'( implementation of Windows API on linux ) which is already listed in the programs.Then install itunes in the same way you do it on windows by double clicking on the installation/setup icon. After installation, the link of the program appears on the Desktop

Its simple to use , i use a couple of windows programs regularly on ubuntu 9.04.

Great summary, SJ!

SJ's overview of the major distros is true to my experience. I've been a distro-hopper for years, but have finally settled on openSUSE because of its longer upgrade path.

you are comedy

"If only Microsoft had done that few years back with Vista. "....get off it you poof. Vista is done and 7 is a great so shut it. I use both Ubuntu and 7. Both are great in their own right so Win fanboy I am not. Just like most people we are sick and tired of you and your boy crew and the constant whining of failures in the past. Mac OS has had some bombs, Linux was insanely tough for newbs for the longest time..Windows had ME(shudder) before the horrid Vista. let it rest man..

"poof" "shut it" This moron

"poof" "shut it"

This moron must be out on day-release.

this is sweet article

I am big fan of CW.. and this site just gets better and better...

lovely article and i am fedora lover..

well written and good to see more people would migrate to linux distros.

Very interesting

Wel... this is very interesting... many opinion about Linux...

I Use Windows XP occasionally, I Use Fedora linux as my default OS... I think both of them is ok, but have more fun with Fedora... also I try ubuntu.. it's great...

Well hey it's just on OS nothing special... But when Vista is released, I decided not to use vista because it's so hard to understand and choose to stick with Linux for fun. Now Windows 7 is released... but I think it is more use full if i use my money to buy other peripherals or another new non-os PC because W7 is too expensive for me...

Sorry about my English....