Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Michael Horowitz's picture
Michael Horowitz

Defensive Computing

Shopping for single platter hard drives - Part 2

Sometimes, when buying a hard drive, you need gobs of gigabytes. But when total storage space is not a prime consideration, opting for the simplest mechanical design, a single platter, makes sense from a Defensive Computing perspective. 

My previous posting was about trying to glean the number of platters inside a hard drive based on assorted specs from the manufacturer. All things being equal, a single internal platter should be more reliable because there is less that can go wrong. It may also offer battery life and heat benefits.

Within the Seagate 7200.12 line of 3.5 inch hard drives, the specs showed that the six models fell into two camps. The two high capacity models share one specification profile as do the four lower capacity models.

Based on the weight of the drives, as well as their height and the power needed to keep them spinning, it seemed  that the four lower capacity models have fewer platters than the two higher capacity models.

And they do.

But, even though the four lower capacity models have identical weight, height and power requirements, they are, nonetheless, physically different.

The two lowest capacity models (160GB and 250GB) have a single disc platter while the 320GB and 500GB models have two platters. The two largest capacity models (1TB and 750GB) have four disc platters.

How do I know this? Mike Hall of Seagate said so.

Why the mystery? Why aren't the number of platters included in the published specs? He doesn't know.

This is not to pick on Seagate, I've looked at other specs for hard drives and they don't normally include the number of platters.

A quick look, for example, at the specs for the Western Digital Caviar Blue line shows they also fail to include the number of platters. I'll see if anyone from Western Digital can shed some light on this.

The specs for the Hitachi Ultrastar A7K1000 line do include the number of platters (referred to as "data disks"). There are three models starting at 500GB. The 500GB  model consists of three platters, the higher capacity models have more.

However, the Ultrastar A7K2000 line by Hitachi, which also starts with a 500GB model, does not include the number of platters in its specs. Likewise, the specs for the Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C line do not include the number of platters. I'll also try to contact Hitachi to see if they offer any single platter models. 

 

What People Are Saying

Just get an ssd and move

Just get an ssd and move on....

Hello. I'm in the market for

Hello. I'm in the market for a new hard drive as well and came across your blog. Have you locked at any Samsung hard drives? The Spinpoint F3 has a single platter 500 gb version. Looking forward to part 3.

MTBF?

This might actually be a useful (series of?) article(s) if you included MTBF for these drives. (Mean Time Before Failure). Otherwise, what can we glean from this? Does the number of platters affect drive life or not? And what about power consumption?

There are no stats here to compare. Speculation and conjecture are not why I read these blogs. I guess that's why after two days I'm the only one to comment.

I'm in NYC and the two day

I'm in NYC and the two day lag is because we're busy gearing up for the Marathon and celebrating at Halloween parties...just keep your lid on and check back on Monday for the tons of snarky comments on this admittedly uninformative article.

I'm not so sure MTBF will be

I'm not so sure MTBF will be the useful neutral comparison standard you think it is.

See: http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/perf/qual/specMTBF.html.

And MTBF means Mean Time BETWEEN Failures.