Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


5 Reasons why Ubuntu 9.10 is better than Windows 7

Okay, I'm a Linux guy you already know I'm going to come down in favor of Ubuntu 9.10.. But, I actually like Windows 7 as well. Which lead me to the question, why do I still prefer Linux?

1) Security

Windows 7 is no more secure than Windows has ever been. Is it better than Vista? Sure. Is it faster than XP? Not so much. Does it run a ton of popular applications? You betcha. But is Windows 7 still prone to an endless array of malware programs and stuck with a pre-Internet security model? Yes — yes, it is.

I'm able to keep a Windows PC safe. I run my own Windows PCs and servers and help with friends. While I'm good at computers, I'm sure anyone who's reasonably smart can manage it as well. But I'm lazy: I don't want to always be keeping my eye on Windows threats; I don't want to worry about being hacked while shopping online; and I don't want to be careful about avoiding clicking on a crooked link in yet another malicious e-mail letter.

With Linux, I can be lazy and safe.

2) Cheap

I'm also cheap. I use older computers until they fall apart. I have Ubuntu 9.10 working great on a 1.4GHz Pentium IV HP with 512MB of RAM — a machine I got back in 2000. I could no more get a decent version of Windows 7 (Home Premium or above) to run on that box than I could get my old Toyota RAV-4 to break 100 MPH on the highway.

But forget about the hardware: let's talk upgrade prices. You can get Windows 7 now quite cheaply. For example, Windows 7 Home Premium lists for $119.99 as an upgrade, but you can do a clean install for the same price. With some shopping around, you can easily get that version of Windows 7 for around $50. Compare that to Ubuntu, where the price is... uh... zero.

3) Easy upgrade

This is how I upgraded Ubuntu: I downloaded and burned a CD, booted up my Ubuntu system with it, and installed the new version. I was done. Total time, just short of an hour.

This link describes how I upgraded my XP PCs to Windows 7. It took me eight hours. Here's the short version: I had to use two additional programs — Windows Easy Transfer and LapLink's PCmover — besides my installation DVD. When I do this for a business, I replace Windows Easy Transfer with User State Migration Tool 4.0.

It isn't easy. Unless you love playing with technology for its own sake, don't do it. If you really want Windows 7, and you're currently using XP, buy a new Windows 7 PC. It's not only easier, but when you consider how much time the process takes, it's also cheaper.

The upgrade path from Vista is much easier, but it's still time-consuming: Microsoft itself estimates that it can take up to 20 hours.

4) Hardware compatibility

There is a persistent delusion that Linux only supports a limited set of peripherals. Wrong. Ubuntu Linux supports pretty much every piece of hardware out there. Yes, there are some items, especially graphic cards and chipsets, for which you may need to download a driver to get the most out of your graphics.

What does this have to do with comparing Windows 7 and Ubuntu? A lot. Even though Microsoft did a much better job of supporting hardware with Windows then they did with Vista, it still has gaps in supporting commonplace devices.

For example, there's the already infamous iPhone synchronization problem, which seems to be a combination of 64-bit Windows 7 and certain high-end motherboards that use Intel's P55 Express chipset. Or how about this one, which I find hard to believe but it's true: many HP printers still don't have Windows 7 drivers.

How can this be!? The last time I checked with IDC, HP still had 54% of the U.S. printer market. Amazing. Simply amazing.

5) Applications

Conventional wisdom is that Windows has the software advantage because it has more polished applications than Linux does. And it does. But how many of those do you use? Sure, if nothing but Adobe Photoshop will do, then you're not going to want to run Linux. Of course, my question to you then is why aren't you running Snow Leopard on a Mac — but that's neither here nor there.

But, with the exception of games, I don't see any reason to favor Windows. Ubuntu Linux comes with a free office suite, OpenOffice. If you want an office suite for Windows 7, you're going to be paying extra for it. Want an e-mail program? Outlook Express doesn't come with Windows anymore. Ubuntu has Evolution, the best e-mail and groupware client on the planet as far as I'm concerned. Need to back up your system? Both can do that, but only Ubuntu has its own online back-up service, Ubuntu One, with 2GB of storage.

Want a program that doesn't come with the operating system? Easy. Use the Ubuntu Software Center, Ubuntu's new one stop application "store." I put store in quotes because it's all free. With Windows, you know the drill. Go to your local store, poke around what's available on Download.com and Tucows, etc. etc. Just be sure to have your credit card ready since a good deal of Windows software isn't open source or free.

I don't expect really to convince any Windows fans out there to switch. What I do hope for though is to give you some food for thought. Give Ubuntu a try; there are many easy ways to try Linux without changing anything on your Windows PC. You may just fine that Ubuntu or another desktop Linux will do everything you want to do on a computer with a lot less trouble and money.

What People Are Saying

Liar! 1.Ubuntu is slower and

Liar!
1.Ubuntu is slower and unstable well enough to be crashed in moment.
2. Quite important HW is not supported, for example, multimonitor, dock stations.
3. Applications? Wow! Try to find working IDE C++ for Linux. Or help on C++. You shouled use notepad(vim) and man(manpages).
4. Price. 119 usd. Wow! Software engineer gets 10-100$ per hour. Do you think it is enough to buy modern OS?

@Liar

1) wrong?
2) I'm running two monitors flawlessly out of the box right now. Understandably, docking stations may not work.
3) I've never actually written in C++, but I believe you can get eclipse with a C++ plugin and you should be set.
4) 119 USD is infinitely times more money than free. Whether you can afford it or not is not the issue here.

Things I disagree with

Easy Upgrade

I was able to move free XP to Vista to 7 from one computer to another between Vista and 7 with quite a bit of ease.

As long as you are not stupid with your files everything is easy.

I just backed up my game files, my application profiles, and my documents, Format / Reinstall, and then dump them installing programs as I need them.

Applications

There are an insane number of open source and free software application out there for windows. Anything you can find on linux, it has more than likely be ported to or started on windows.

Moral of the story is: unless your careless with your stuff, its really not that big of a hassle to run windows (have you ever tried to bridge a network connection in linux, omgawd...)

Dear Mr. Vaughan, Amen

Dear Mr. Vaughan,

Amen Brother!!!

I am glad that are so many windoz users. If there was no windoz, I would not get to say "If you had Lunux, you would not have this problem" every time some one calls me for help.

I am an happy, HIV infected by Windoz, Linux Ubuntu User

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, thanks for the article, I was happy to read you. Long live Ubuntu Linux, and a big thanks to Mark Shuttleworth and the Ubuntu people.

Side note, I have received Windows 7 DVD by mail yesterday and my doctor tells me today that I am HIV infected. Since I live alone in an underground bunker, I suspect a new Microsoft trick.

Does any of you suffer the same symptom? I have barely touched the package to move it from the mailbox to the incinerator.

Reading some of the Windoz fanboys comments above (e.g. Microsoft rules...), I do believe they suffer from brain cells infection and HIV induced by the contact with a MS product or MS marketing lie.

PS: Mr. Karl - the driver of my Benz for the past 4 years - says Windoz sucks. Hence, I believe Windows is not compatible with my driver. Does that clarify drivers issue with Windoz. Don't try to fool me Microsoft dick, there is only ONE 007 and is name is Bond. Windoz7 just a flat joke.

Windows 7 is awesome, but then again . . .

While I take some exception to the author's assesment of Windows 7 (Don't get me wrong: Windows 7 can be installed on some fairly old hardware), Ubuntu Linux is still the "Old Hardware install Champ". After getting of dealing with Windows XP (Service Pack 3),I've just came from installing Ubuntu 9.04 on an old Toshiba Satellite A55-S106 with only a Celeron M CPU and 2GB of memory. I'm in the process of upgrading to 9.10 right now. It's like I got a brand new laptop, though it now looks like crap! It seems at the moment, there's a fair amount of parity between Windows 7, Ubuntu and Mac OS X.

1.Security? Sure, security

1.Security? Sure, security is a plus on linux. Only because every hacker is attacking windows. Windows users are easy targets. It's because every pc initially comes with windows. Those tards too stupid to migrate off or even upgrade get attacked.
2.Cheap? Naw. Look at the prices of new computers from dell. They are much more expensive with ubuntu.
3.Easy upgrades. Sure. No registry to get in the way. And you can make a package list instead of having to look for the original CDs. Much nicer. Still upgrading Ubuntu usually requires a complete wipe of the hard disk.
4.Hardware compatibility. Perhaps for the first few months after windows 7 has come out Ubuntu will have more hardware support. Soon though most hardware vendors will write drivers for windows 7. And not for Ubuntu. We'll have to continue putting up with backward engineered pathetic drivers that run magnitudes slower than those on Windows.
5.All command line applications will continue to work better on Ubuntu. All GUI based applications will continue to work much much much better than Ubuntu. I find GUI based applications are mostly inferior to command line apps. Your mileage may vary...

"Security? Sure, security is

"Security? Sure, security is a plus on linux. Only because every hacker is attacking windows."
Not true a recent Hacking convention had Mac, Windows and Linux pitted against one another. Mac got hacked the 1st day, Vista the second, and Linux never did. It was for $10,000. So I'm sure they would of hacked it if they could.

3. Need to reformat to

3. Need to reformat to upgrade, huh? Debian based Linux distros are known for the best package upgrade system available.

4. Pathetic, backward engineered drivers? Let's see you make a driver. Those people work their asses off trying to make working drivers for everyone and you criticize them because you hate that OS.

5. You contradicted your own statement.
For: All GUI based applications will continue to work much better that Ubuntu (Ubuntu is GUI based, idiot).
Against: I find GUI based applications are mostly inferior to command line apps (your grammar is wrong too).

If you're going to criticize something, give valid arguments. You're basically criticizing a free check because it isn't cash.

drivers

As I am retired and have a limited income, I do not obtain the "latest and greatest" as it is released. My current system is built on an ASUS A8N-E board, an AMD Athlon (TM) 64 3200+, and has only 512 MB of RAM. It runs Ubuntu 9.04 very well and fast. I have tried both Ubuntu and Kubuntu 9.10 in both 32 bit and 64 bit versions. All of the 9.10 versions are slow in comparison. I suspect that it is the lack of GBs of RAM.

My printer is an HP Laserjet 1320. It has had full functionality since I installed my first version of Linux, (Linspire 5.0). That includes two sided printing.