Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Why Windows 7's success may ruin Microsoft

They shouldn't be popping the champagne corks at Microsoft over the news that Windows 7 sales are skyrocketing. A well-known management consultant says that Windows 7's success could be the worst thing to happen to Microsoft, and turn the company in the General Motors of software.

The market research company NPD Group reports that sales of Windows 7 in the U.S. "were 234 percent higher than Vista’s first few days of sales."

Stephen Baker, vice president of industry analysis at NPD said this about the Windows 7 launch:

"Microsoft's program of early low-cost pre-sales, high visibility marketing, and aggressive deals helped make the Windows 7 software launch successful. In a slow environment for packaged software Windows 7 brought a large number of customers into the software aisles."

Sounds like good news, doesn't it? In fact, it's just about the worst news that Microsoft could hear, says Jay R. Galbraith, president and founder, Galbraith Management Consultants. In an article for CNNMoney, Galbraith argues that Microsoft could potentially become the the General Motors of software --- old, outdated, irrelevant, and eventually headed towards ruin. And the success of Windows 7, he says, will only accelerate that.

Galbraith says that in order for Microsoft to thrive, it needs to shift its attention away from the desktop, and towards other devices and cloud computing. He has this to say about why a Windows 7 success will hurt Microsoft:

"The worst thing that could happen is a success with Windows 7, which would reinforce management's focus on the desktop. Then, as customers move away from the desktop to smartphones and other devices, market share will decline. But if share declines slowly, maybe a point or two a year, the drop will not be enough to overcome the pride that comes with high margins and high profits. Over time, the desktop mafia will experience a shift from pride to hubris. Welcome to the General Motors scenario.

Galbraith says that Microsoft needs to clean house and rid itself of managers tied to past ways of thinking and doing business. And the quickest way for that to happen, he believes, is for Microsoft's competitors to succeed:

"The best thing that could happen to Microsoft would be successes by Apple (AAPL) or Google (GOOG) that cause a significant loss of sales and market share. The shock would create a sense of urgency and cause the leaders to clean house."

He says that Microsoft does not have to turn into the next General Motors, as long as Steve Ballmer takes drastic action:

"The General Motors scenario does not have to happen. Ballmer can focus inward on transforming the desktop mafia to the new computing paradigm. Or, better yet, appoint a hands-on, change-experienced chief operating officer who can do it with him."

I don't see that happening, though. Ballmer is too wedded to the past --- a fresh set of eyes are needed if Microsoft is going to transform itself.

 Microsoft clearly isn't in trouble today --- it's got nearly a global monopoly on operating systems, and other profit-making product lines. But GM at one point was in a similar situation. It took decades for GM to decline. Unless Microsoft heeds Galbraith's advice, the same eventually may happen to Microsoft.

 

What People Are Saying

You know Preston, You are a

You know Preston, You are a prime example of someone who manages to get a job blogging about IT, yet understands nothing about the industry. You never actually worked in IT, writing about it does not count BTW.

-looking back at many of your articles , they are as laughable as this one....lol, but keep up the work, you always make me giggle

Windows7

I think the author has some good points. GM primary did collapse due to traditional thinking along with paying U.S. wages. Japan did have Dr. Deming to restructure the quality of the plants and production. Anyway, Microsoft would love to have more of the market share that Google holds. Why do you think they wanted Yahoo; even if they acquired Yahoo this would give Microsoft only 15% of the search engine marke; which is about 250 million dollars per percent. Advertising and services is where the money is heading much like new engine technologies in the automotive industry.

This Article is worth nothing

This article made me laugh. It is completely visible that it is biased towards other companies and completely anti-Microsoft. Microsoft has countless other products in the market. They have MSSQL, MS Office on Windows and Mac which Apple hasn't really been able to compete with (Sure, Apple made Pages in their iWork package but Pages is just not as complete as Microsoft Office that's why many people are buying MS Office on Mac OS X). Microsoft has been in the mobile business much longer than Apple has been. They have created Windows CE which is on many mobile devices.

The good thing about Windows CE is that it can be put on various mobile devices whereas iPhone OS can only run on the iPhone just like the fact that Mac OS X can only be run on a Mac computer (actually if you buy an E-Fix device you can run Mac OS X on a PC as well, but oh well). This is not a Microsoft and Apple war again. What I'm trying to explain here is that this article just decides to say, based on no intellectual reality, that Microsoft is doomed to fail even if their Windows 7 is successful. Well as far as I've seen, many users were sad that Windows Vista, according to them (I don't have any issues with Windows Vista myself and I'm a Computer Science Engineer), wasn't very successful. So now that Microsoft heard everybody's voices and did some real development on the Windows platform and came up with a great OS again just like XP, you are saying that it is doomed to fail? What a bunch of crap!

I think the writer of this article really hasn't researched the topic on the web and/or he really doesn't have enough knowledge about the field he is writing on.

My suggestion? Read before you speak.

Microsoft is more than just Windows

This article raises some thought-provoking discussion. The comparison is an interesting one, but I believe that dominant market share is the only similarity between Microsoft and GM. Microsoft is constantly watching the industry and reacting to trends, both current and predicted future ones.

While Windows is a large focus of the company, it is not the only one, as this article implies. As "Alan" said in an earlier post, "MS has branched out into many areas aside from desktop computing." With heavy investment in the Live/Bing/MSN family of services, Microsoft has shown they are serious about online computing. With Windows Azure (http://bit.ly/WindowsAzurePlatform), Microsoft is also investing in cloud computing.

Will the cloud ever replace desktops? Probably not. The cloud can add the ability to run tasks that the desktop couldn't (at least not easily), such as accessing your documents from anywhere, running applications that are too resource-intensive to run on your local PC, and storing large amounts of data with a redundant data-storage service. However, the desktop also serves an important role, as many folks on here have pointed out - running certain applications locally, running your web browser and providing a good user interface (full-sized keyboard and monitor) - which will keep it around for quite a while.

(Jason - collaborating with M80, representing Microsoft and Windows Azure)

Agenda Much?

Jay R. Galbraith sounds like an idiot with an agenda. Who names their consulting firm after themselves anyways. Profit is profit... if you're making money you're doing something right, if you're not.. you're DEC. Despite how bad you want to sell your customers that don't yet need your latest and greatest... cloud computing it's going to be a front burner item in the next 5 years... and likely we'll be installing Windows "8" or "9" before any solid percentage of the population is using "cloud computing" in the workplace.

Computers can also be used for computing.

What a load of BS. Spoken like a true (IT) manager, article scribbler or whatever, who thinks that all computers are used for is writing articles like this or filling the world with useless e-mail dribble. What is it with all you cloud worshipers? You seem to think that cloud computing is the answer to everything. There are actually people out here that just can't get enough computing power and I'm not talking about gamers.

Windows and Unix (no, not Linux) are the only two platforms with a decent selection of serious engineering software. I'm talking about CAD/CAM, simulations, strength analysis, etc... using heavy applications like Catia, SolidWorks, Inventor, AnSys and many others. I'm a mechanical engineer myself and I'm spending 8+ hours a day in front of my computer. Nobody will ever make me believe that the tasks I perform daily will be done in some cloud computing environment, at least not in the foreseeable future.

We didn't have enough computing power ten years ago, we don't have enough today, and won't have enough ten years from now. Every time I open a complex 3D assembly we're talking about loading hundred's of megabyte of data, and if it doesn't happen in seconds it becomes intolerable. Once loaded, the CPU and GPU works like crazy to provide real time rendered 3D graphics while I'm working. Before going home I might start a complex finite element analysis (FEA) on my computer hoping it will be finished when I return the next morning. All done on a high end PC where the graphics card alone costs more than a top of the line Mac Pro. Now put that in your precious cloud will ya.

To all you communication junkies, word scribblers, spreadsheet jockeys, bloggers, facebook crazies... out there. There are still lots of people out here using our computers for COMPUTING, and anyone thinking that desktop computing will disappear needs to think again.

Having said that, agree that Microsoft should explore all kinds of software markets, but not on the expense of Windows.

Per Kviler
Mechanical Engineer

Desktops vs. Workstations

Very interesting example, but sounds more like a workstation than a desktop.

"Desktop vs. workstation: Introduction
http://news.zdnet.com/2422-13569_22-154533.html
This is a transcript of an HP video

The above link is a good read for those that may be interested. And desktops and workstations are different. Desktops -> Cost, image, security. Workstations -> CPU/graphics performance, I/O, certified applications, expandability.

Workstations will not disappear. And neither will desktops. Many home, SOHO and SMB users are involved in desktop publishing, graphic arts, CAD, GIS, etc. And a little customization can transform an ordinary desktop PC into a low-end workstation. And lets face it, some users like their desktops. But I would expect the proportion of desktops to be less in the future than today.

windows and office is ms's

windows and office is ms's highest source of income. software pricing is partially based on how many people buy the software. software that sells many units will cost less than software that sells little units. I wouldn't be surprised if ratio of units sold between sql server and windows os is 1:100

Why Windows 7's success may ruin Microsoft

MS has branched out into many areas aside from desktop computing. And let's face it: The demand for plain old desktop computing will be around for many years to come. It's an accepted convention. As long as there is a market, there is no need for MS to be concerned as long as they continue to produce products people want.

As to GM, their failure was the result of many things. Too many to list here, although ridiculous union demands and poor management at the top were the chief reasons for their failure. Ballmer is no Bill, but he's a smart guy and I think MS will be just fine.

Why Windows 7's success may ruin Microsoft?

How does forcing people to use a VISTA "re-paint job" equate to success? Of course using this product and the MS updates that sabatoge XP are sending more users to Linux. Only a politician would be better at twisting stats to promote his own agenda. I have been using Windows since it's inception. I am discusted with fighting to keep my machines from doing what MS's world order expects. I want my machines to follow my settings and not be reset by MS. Now I have to learn Linux because of Vista/7. Enough is enough I have enough of MS.