Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Seth Weintraub's picture
Seth Weintraub

Apple versus Google

Latest Verizon ad puts the iPhone in the land of the misfit toys

AT&T is already suing Verizon because they believe that Verizon is misrepresenting their service in their latest ads.  Wait until they get a load of the newest round of ads, headlined by the 'Misfit Toys' ad (below).


The ads are a spinoff of the classic Ruldolf, the red-nosed reindeer special below. The characters are the same, they've been licensed by Verizon.


Perhaps by 'misfit', Verizon is saying that the iPhone, as the best smartphone, belongs on the best network.  It doesn't fit on an inferior network.

The ad is also reminiscent of a prior 'Get a Mac' ad that ran a few years ago - just like the "There's an App for that ads" were used by Verizon for their "There's a Map for that" campaign.


Verizon isn't aiming these ads at Apple or the iPhone.  In fact they are slightly congratulatory towards Apple's iPhone.  The elephant asks why the iPhone is there - it has apps and browses the web.

The iPhone then shows everyone its map which is AT&T's 3G coverage.  Everyone then understands gets it.

It is certainly entertaining watching Verizon taking swipes at AT&T. It will be interesting to see how Apple and AT&T respond to these ads, which seem to be sending a strong message leading up to the holiday season. Perhaps something like this hilariously NSFW parody of their "Can you hear me now" ad campaign is in order.


There are two other ads in the trio that are also well done.

What People Are Saying

Foul Language!

Why would you put a link a parody that contains such foul language?

Somebody needs to be looking for a new job!

Chill Out!

This is not a kids forum and, despite occasional posts, I don't think any of us here are five years old.

FFS

Why do you think that he put "NSFW" on the final video? Either you should ensure you are clearer on Internet "disclaimers" or, if indeed you were clear on what "NSFW" meant, stop pressing your own values on others.

I would suspect that the

I would suspect that the advertisement is a violation of some copywrite laws using the iPhone image in this fashion to dig at AT&T. I expect a lawsuit, but this time from Apple.

Nope. Perfectly legal.

In the USA, it's perfectly legal AFAIK to use a competitor's trademark for purposes of comparison advertising. The test case (working from memory) involved Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Verizon could almost certainly use a "real" iPhone if they so desired.

It's rarely done, however, because so many studies have shown that brand *awareness* drives sales, rather than just positive advertising. Thus the old saying, "Publicity is good. Good publicity is even better."

By showing a real iPhone, Verizon would most likely *increase* iPhone sales. Thus, they show a thinly veiled "smartphone" instead.

That isn't an iPhone.

That isn't an iPhone. Verizon isn't that dumb.