Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Where is the Linux desktop going?

While I like the Linux desktop a lot, I don't pretend that it's that popular. That's why I found it fascinating that, despite everything Microsoft has been able to throw at it, desktop Linux still managed to claim 32% of the netbook market.

And Microsoft has thrown everything but the kitchen sink at desktop Linux. For example, the Redmond giant has strong-armed vendors into not selling Linux-powered netbooks; lied about Linux sales; and all but gave XP Home away to keep vendors from including Linux instead . Despite all that, it seems, according to ABI Research, that desktop Linux has actually grown in the last year.

ABI reports that almost a third of the netbooks that will have shipped in 2009 came with Linux. Last year at this same time, ASUS, then the world's biggest netbook vendor, said that only three out of ten of its netbooks were shipped with Linux. In fact, looking ahead, Jeff Orr, an ABI analyst, predicted that Linux will overtake Windows on netbooks by 2013.

Why? Because it's cheaper. The rise of ARM-powered netbooks with Linux that will bring laptops to the $100 price range is expected to help Linux take over the bottom-end of computing.

This will put Windows in an interesting spot. Mac already owns the high end, and Linux will end up with the low end. At the same time, more and more of our work will be done with online services, with Google Docs and the like, almost all of which are based on Linux.

Historically, being in the middle of a market isn't a comfortable place to be. People who want the best will turn to Macs; people who want a bargain will go to Linux. The usual argument is that everyone already uses Windows and they need their applications. Fair enough. But what happens when you don't need Windows for the programs you use every day?

I've already argued that your grandparents can do quite well running Linux with the applications that are on available on the Web. IBM's latest desktop Linux partnership with Ubuntu is all about getting business users to use Ubuntu for their basic platform while running SaaS (software as a service) applications like Lotus Notes for office work. And Google's Chrome operating system, while Linux-based, is clearly going to further blur the line between the traditional desktop and the Web 2.0 world.

If these trends continue, I expect that by the mid-2010s we'll see a world where Linux will be becoming the most popular desktop operating system. Most people may not notice it, though, because no one will be advertising it as Linux; they'll be promoting these Linux-based, Web application-enabled PCs as do-it-all, portable computers the same way smartphones are promoted now.

Does anyone except the most techie people know in 2009 whether it's Android, Symbian or Windows Mobile powering our phones? No. Will anyone except our older, wiser and perhaps even more techie selves know by 2015 what operating system is running on our netbooks? I doubt it.

We're getting ready to go into the post-desktop operating system world, and it's going to be fascinating to see how it all comes together.

What People Are Saying

Ballmer's graph says Linux higher than Mac

where is the desktop going?

Everywhere.
And in whatever direction the various desktop projects want to go.
KDE4.3 is a gem but if you want a mac clone you have GNome, old hardware go XCFE, E17 is my new toy... You can test Moblin 2.0 on the latest Mandriva Linux 2010 (best Linux distro), Chrome is gonna be interesting, and web based interfaces like the overprices Litl....
Cchoice, choice, choice so you can get a desktop how YOU like it and want not how someone tells you you have to like.
My 70 year old mother has a desktop that is tailor made for her needs with few programs, big icons in KDE4 and the kids have their own desktops (my eldest still loves his Puppy Linux but is now embarassed by the name) and I can use it as a developing platform on mine.

Its all Linux desktops.

As for statistics, a few years ago Linux was at 2 to 6 % of the desktop then this year the meme that certain people was pushing was Linux finally breaking 1%.

Look how about we see what Steve Ballmer thinks is the desktop breakdown.

The graph below is from a presentation he did in Feb. 2009 it shows Windows, Windows pirated, Linux and Mac.

Look at the pie chart... the Linux % seems highter than the Mac:

http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/02/25/linux-is-more-of-a-threat-than-apple-says-ballmer

Optical illusion?

That sound you hear is fanbois hyperventilating....

Yes, I've used my Steve Ballmer card.
Deal with it.

Seriously, how did this pass by the radar? this is Linux best ammunition as to what the desktop % is...its from Microsoft's CEO

Sources?

Interesting. The Microsoft slide shows the Linux desktop market share to be approximately 50% larger than the Mac OS X market share.

Here is an interesting URL that is updated every hour:

"Bestsellers in Software
http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/software

You will find most, but certainly not all, run on Mac OS X. However, you won't find ANYTHING on Amazon's "Bestsellers in Software" that runs natively on Linux. Some do run with the help of Codeweavers or Win4Lin, which aren't on Amazon's list either.

What are the sources that were used to create the Microsoft slide? The web-based counting sites CONSISTENTLY show the Mac OS X desktop market share to be approximately 5 times the Linux Desktop market share. Do you think this slide could be Microsoft propaganda to counter the monopoly accusations?

Well, Duh!

[Quote] However, you won't find ANYTHING on Amazon's "Bestsellers in Software" that runs natively on Linux. [/Quote]

No one goes to a comic shop to buy bibles, either -- now why do you suppose that is?

Duh befits you

If popular ISV software had Linux ports, Amazon would indeed see part of the action.

But don't hold your breath as Adobe is in the process of laying off 680 employees. More green shoots.

Not Applicable

The kinds of software applicable to large enterprise installations (or even small niche industries) isn't sold at places like Amazon.

Huh?

Who's talking about large enterprise installations?

This is about the consumer market.

What do you expect, amazon

What do you expect, amazon to sell products that cost 0$? Shares are based on computers sold with Linux preinstalled

Again, sources?

"Shares are based on computers sold with Linux preinstalled

Neither the Neowin article, nor Osnews article referenced by the former, make this claim.

Here is an example of a site that bases market share on web hits:

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/

Visit the site and drill-down to Mac OS X vs. Linux. The ratio is approximately 5:1. There are others and they track quite closely.

Many, but certainly not all, Linux users would love to run ISV software currently only available for Windows and Mac OS X natively on Linux.

If Desktop Linux were ANYWHERE near to Ballmer's claim, they would at least be a blip on Amazon's software bestseller list.

Not a "representative sample"

hitslinks stats are from their customers (and they give "rebrandable" Windows binaries and other Windows-oriented service).

This of course explain why hitslinks stats are invariable most favorable to Windows-share, and unfavorable to Linux-share, like most company purporting such analysis.

W3Counter is main "trustworthy" collector of statistics -- and for various reasons they under-report "Linux" (often counted as "other OS" >4%) they at least not have agenda, or "adjust" numbers every few month, get paid for collecting/publishing. In 2004 Google said Linux was 1% of client requests -- why think still 1% today?

Look at statistic for W3Schools, Seti@home, folding@home, etc. See numbers where no one get paid or "encouraged" for numbers that big company like.

Inconsistent

Microsoft's own analysis based on "internal sources" shows desktop Linux to be 50% larger than Mac OS X. And yet they encourage companies to provide hitlinks stats favorable to Microsoft, with the ratio of Mac OS X to desktop Linux at approximately 5:1.

The problem is that the hitlinks site in question here:

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/

currently shows the IE browsers at 65% and Microsoft Firefox at 24%. Where's the Microsoft influence here?