Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Liveblog: Google Chrome operating system arrives

Today, November 19th, we're finally going to get a good look at Google's Chrome desktop operating system. Join me as I give a live overview. You can also see it for yourself, with a Real or Windows Media Player at Google's Investor site.

12:53: Going into this, we know Chrome, the operating system, is a Linux-based desktop operating system that's designed for primarily for netbooks.

We also know that it will use a new windowing system--sorry KDE, GNOME--and that its primary interface will be the Chrome Web browser. You could argue that is the first Internet-based operating system.

Why does yet another operating system matter? Because this time, the company that's bringing it to the table, Google, is big enough to give Microsoft and Windows a run for their money on the desktop. The last time that happened was in the late 80s when OS/2 walked the earth.

1:00 Ahead of the announcement, Google has released some of the source code at: http://src.chromium.org/

1:05: Today, Google is announcing the open-sourcing of the project. Developers get your programming tools ready.

1:07: 40-million primary Chrome Web browser users today. Emphasis is on end-to-end speed with the browser--which is nice but what about Chrome the OS?

1:10: Chrome browser for Mac, and Linux, the basis of Chrome the OS, is on its way real soon now.

1:11: "Web applications should run as well as desktop applications." We're figuring out how Web apps can take advantage of local resource, such as accessing the GPU for graphics, and multi-core CPUs. Web applications must also be able to work offline.

1:12: "Perfect storm of converging trends" Explosive growth of netbooks; hundreds of millions of users are now living on the cloud. Anything you want to do can be done on the Web. At the same time, phones, netbooks, tablets, and laptops are all beginning to share capabilities.

1:15. Chrome OS us the new model for the 'desktop.' It should both boot and run applications very fast. Every application will be a Web application. No need to install or update software. This _is_ different.

1:17: Users' data, applications, and customization will all reside on the cloud.

1:18: Security. Everything runs in the browser security sandbox. And now for a look at the Chrome OS, which--surprise!--looks a lot like the Chrome browser. Why? Because everyone knows how to use a browser.

1:20: On the top left, you can have tabs that connect directly to your favorite applications. GMail, Facebook, whatever.

1:22: An App menu gives you 'panels,' which are persistent, light-weight windows that can hold apps.

1:25: You'll be able to listen to music, watch videos, play games, or read e-books (bye-bye Kindle?) in panels.

1:28: Adobe Flash already works in Chrome OS.

1:28: Chrome OS will be able to handle peripherals such as USB drives. Chrome has an open API so any Web app. should be able to work in Chrome. The example used is using a Microsoft Web-based program to open an Excel file.

1:29: Adobe Acrobat functionality is also already built in.

1:30: And, now for a look under the hood. Google is opening their design docs as well as the code.

1:31: Chrome devices will be build on SSD (Solid State Drive) to gain speed. This is a vision of the 'computer' as more like the TV than a PC. It should be instant-on and ready to go.

1:33: Chrome is a stripped out OS. No boot-loader per se; no background programs to provide services for traditional desktop apps. Everything is on the Web so only what's needed for the Web is loaded.

1:33: All the software components, from the kernel on up, is cryptographically signed to make sure it has been hacked or a malware attack. If something is wrong, a fresh, untouched component is installed and your entire Chrome instance is re-imaged.

1:36: In Chrome OS, all end-user apps run in a browser sandbox so they can't make changes to your PCs. Every tab you run is kept away from each other, the hardware, and the operating system.

1:37: The root file system is read-only. On the user partition, all data is encrypted. If someone swipes your system, the thief will have fits trying to get into your data. In addition, everything on your Chrome OS device is synced back to the cloud.

1:40: This is a new model for computing. Google thinks this system is fundamentally more secure.

1:41: Going to the market. Devices to appear by the end of 2010. Ala Apple's Mac, Chrome will only run on very specific hardware.

1:45: Google Chrome OS netbooks will be larger than today's netbooks. Bigger screens, full-sized keyboards.

1:46: Chrome is based on Linux, in particular Ubuntu and Moblin are mentioned. Google really, really wants your help, and wants you to help these projects as well.

1:47: And, now for a "Yea Chrome" video with a crack or two at Microsoft. The question of the moment: "Do you really want 'everything' to be on the Internet. Q&A begins.

1:49: Will Android apps. run on Chrome? Answer: They're all open-source. No real answer.

1:50 Price-points? Focused on getting larger netbooks. Prices up in the air. Partners will decide.

1:51: W3C API standard support? We are working closely with W3C. Partner info on hardware is coming out.

1:54: App. Store? No info on that yet. There are, however, mechanism to help people find applications. Drivers and hardware components are being worked on with partners. Open-source drivers will be used where ever possible. As for apps not available on the Web there, Google expects users to have other desktops for those apps. So, don't expect to see, say, AutoCAD on a Google Chrome box.

1:58: Codex support? HTML 5 is supported and we're very committed to Flash. Others will be added as possible. Some other proprietary plugins--Silverlight--may be added.

1:59: A lot of what you can do in the Chrome Web browser will be doable in the Chrome OS and vice-versa.

2:00 Whoops! They've run long and the Webcast ended before the Q&A ended. Bad Google Webcast team! Bad! No biscuit.

The take-away message is already there. Google Chrome OS will be a device-based OS that _must_ have Internet access to show to its best advantage. Thus, this isn't so much a Windows 7 competitor as it is an attempt to provide a full-featured, operating system for netbooks and other mobile devices.

This is, however, a direct slap in the face of Microsoft, which has tried with Windows 7 Starter Edition, to pen the netbook into only being low-end devices. Google is saying that the netbook needs to grow so that it can deliver a better user-experience with a fully open-source and net-based operating system.

Interesting times lie ahead.

What People Are Saying

Better than before

I hope this system will be better and secure than current operating systems.

Chrome OS Demo

Since I don't like real player's licensing terms, I will not install it on any computer I own. However I will acknowledge that real player is available for Linux, and credit them for supporting Linux. I'll have to go back and review the licensing terms to see if they've changed them so that I feel comfortable using the product.

I do have flash player installed, and searched You Tube, and found what I think is eleven minutes of the demonstration of Chrome. It is interesting. It looks like it was installed on a duplicate of this machine.

I was impressed with the reader. Finally, someone gets it that a laptop screen is wider than it is high, and using page formatting that comfortably fits the screen is a real plus.

Also, there was mention of having a "browser" available that looked like the browser for the chrome OS for the Mac and Linux. I will be looking forward to when that comes out.

I was amused when he double clicked on a .xls file and it opened auto-magically with Windows Live. However I was bothered by the necessity of storing everything on the cloud. That makes your network connection a single point of failure that can bring your system to a frozen halt.

It is really not much different, if in a work environment you have a server where all your work is stored. Likewise if the server goes down, your work is at a standstill. But if the network goes down, you can continue working locally with other OS. Not so with Chrome, as far as I could tell.

Contrarywise, if you are in a situation where you are traveling across the border, and the DHS decides to investigate your laptop, it doesn't mean you will be at a standstill until they give you your machine back. Further, I can see people making it a habit of encrypting and saving their data on the cloud.

You pays your money and takes your chances. It's nice to have choices to make. Choice is good.

No need for Realplayer -

No need for Realplayer - Mplayer will play realplayer media files.

http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mplayer-fedora.html

Clicking on Advertisements while posting on blogs.

While writing the above posts, I noticed a Microsoft advertisement, offering a download for a free trial of Microsoft Office 2007.

The idea of try before buy, has grown a lot in the last few years. Some open source applications are limited trial products or lite products under the GPL, with the full featured product offered under a non-GPL license as a purchased item.

Now, I've griped in the past that I've not tried Windows 7 because, among other reasons, I don't have the bucks at the moment to buy a copy of Windows 7, only to discover I don't like it.

I've downloaded a number of Linux distributions, to see which ones I like. Now granted, the choice I made was based on my own personal biases, and others may not agree with me, but that's fine, because I was looking for something I wanted to use. Now, note, the distributions I've looked at were run from live CDs. When running from a live CD, there is a performance hit because the CD is slower, and it takes much longer to open an application. But you get an idea of what the distribution offers.

Most importantly, there is no risk to the system you are currently running.

Here Microsoft was giving me an opportunity to try their software before purchasing it.

It would seem therefore only fair to consider their offer, if I wasn't going to simply be a Linux fanboy.

I clicked on the link, and on the download page, one of the first warnings it gives you is:

"...please donโ€™t test Windows 7 on your primary home or business PC."

All I have available right now is my primary PC. So the Microsoft trial is dead on arrival. I have no idea why they don't provide a live CD.

Finally there was this:

"The 90-day Trial is offered for a limited time and in limited quantity. The download will be available through March 31, 2010, while supplies last."

The ninety days I can understand. I just could not for the life of me figure out the "while supplies last" meant. I've never encountered that with any other trial software download. How can you run out of something you are simply copying?

I just plain give up on Microsoft. They simply don't want me, or care about having me, as a customer. I'm clearly destined to be a Linux fanboy. sigh

Questions

Will Chrome run on ARM?

Is Chrome 32-bit or 64-bit? (x86/x64)

Re: Questions

[Will Chrome run on ARM?]

Yes. Google's embedded version sold with hardware will be on Intel Atom (ix86) and ARM devices.

Is Chrome 32-bit or 64-bit? (x86/x64)

Google's embedded version sold with on Intel Atom (ix86) and ARM devices will be 32 bit because those CPUs are 32 bit, but others can compile it for any other architecture 32 or 64 bit.

Hey thanks

So Chrome will be on netbooks and smartbooks. And Android and Chrome will both be in the smartbook arena. I'll be interested how that will play itself out. Once people realize that netbooks aren't suited for much more than an Internet appliance, see the responsiveness of Chrome, and the price, Microsoft is in trouble on the low end. Windows Starter Edition will disappoint the uninformed. Office will be slow. By the time you get Microsoft's ribbon interface on a netbook, there isn't much room for user data.

Your comment that Chrome can be compiled to be 64-bit tells me that it is really 32-bit. Perhaps in the future the netbook/notebook distinction will become a 32-bit/64-bit distinction. This will allow Microsoft to focus on 64-bit. That may be a good thing.

Linux supports pretty well

Linux supports pretty well every 32 or 64 bit cpu architecture, but it has to be compiled for each specific architecture. Since Linux is written with portability in mind, and since all the code is open source and available for third parties to recompile, porting is relatively trivial. The main issue with porting is proprietary code which cannot be recompiled except by the proprietor of the code. Adobe 64 bit Linux flashplayer and pretty well everything is available on IA64 platforms, and I believe Google is organising porting of a hardware accelerated flashplayer and other movie acceleration drivers to the ARM architecture. That pretty well covers all bases.

64 bit architectures are not really required for any other reason than memory addressing - 32 bit Linux will only address up to 4GB of RAM. For Linux servers and high end desktops 64 bit is a big deal for this reason. the Atom and ARM are 32 bit. Netbooks and nettops don't really need 64 bit cpus, since they don't need to address that much RAM memory.

just tell me this if in the

just tell me this if in the near future you have to buy a netbook what would u prefer a chrome os netbook limited to just the "new" google aproach or X netbook with y operating system where u can in the worst of cases install chrome and have the same plus a real operating system with real storage and local apps.
This is disigned to be a failure another niche or in the other hand if google is succesfull every web browser company mozilla ,the opera folks even microsoft will complain about monopoly (microsoft vs usa).
we left dumb terminals in the 80's i don't see the need for them in 2009 in a wireless version

You have all options.

Google's branded product is designed to be incorporated into a customised BIOS for ultra fast boot and instant on, so that will only be available on new hardware sold with Chrome OS embedded in flash memory on it.

However Google is not trying to compete with Windows, Linux or Mac, so every feature it has will be available on Windows, Linux and Mac, albeit with Windows/Linux/Mac's slow boot, complexity and resource hog, big maintenance overhead, short battery life etc. Even if Google does not port it, because the project is open source, it can easily be ported to Windows/Linux/Mac, and others will definitely do it.