Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Seth Weintraub's picture
Seth Weintraub

Apple versus Google

Google's ChromeOS: Ten observations

Google took the wraps off their Chrome OS yesterday. The OS will be a big deal. Here are some observations that you might not have considered.

1.This isn't a 100% Google endeavor. Canonical, the company that puts out the most popular desktop Linux, Ubuntu, is doing some of the major work behind it. That means that they are also going to be experts at this Open Source OS and will be able to do things like build a Firefox OS or create their own builds for netbooks.

2. Google is really slimming this down in every aspect. Netbooks and laptops that run this OS aren't going to need hard drives or DVD players or much besides USB and power interfaces (and 802.11/3G internet). In fact, the OS will work well for System on a Chip (SoC) devices like tablets and thin clients.

Also being SSD-only will also allow it to forego a lot of the PC's BIOS startup obligations and its current Disk system reliance.

3. Thin client. Chrome OS is really an "Internet Thin Client OS" when you think about it. The OS is the browser; browsers run simple apps. Remember this could also be a Point of Sale (PoS) cash register thin client or a kiosk or those things that UPS and other carriers use.

There are about 10 trillion thin clients out there running some sort of Windows which account for a lot of Microsoft's revenue and market share. Now Microsoft will have to compete with almost free hardware and a free OS. That isn't going to be pretty for any of their OSes.

4. This won't be released until 2010 but there will still be issues with Internet connectivity next year. Airline flights in a year might have some Wi-Fi access, but you aren't going to be able to stream Hulu over the connection, not when everyone else on the plane is trying to do the same thing. There are also lots of white spaces on the 3G carriers maps. Anyone using an iPhone on AT&T knows that. These devices, even with significant caching, won't be very much fun without Internet.

5. Web apps are nice and getting nicer, but they still lack a lot of the interactivity of native apps. Just ask Apple, who released the iPhone thinking developers would be fine with Web only apps. And the Palm Pre's WebOS, which takes Web apps a little further, isn't exactly flying off the shelves or attracting hordes of developers.

That isn't to say Web apps aren't going to make huge strides for/because of the Chrome OS. I think we'll see things like Web App gaming really take off. Oh and Google said they wouldn't be supporting Silverlight on the Chrome OS but it is implied that Adobe's Flash will be supported at some point (and probably Air). We'll see what can be done there.

6. Even with HTML5 caching of email calendars and other offline information, you don't get everything you need. Say you have a few multi-GB Gmail accounts on your machine. Add some media, like 10GB of MP3s and a few movies. You begin to spill over normal SSD-sized hard drives. That six-hour coast to coast to coast flight is going to get a little boring. Airline Wifi isn't going to cut it either, even if Google makes it free.

7. Chrome OS will eat the bottom of the Windows market. Not just Thin Clients like I mentioned above. It is going to take a lot of low end Netbook market share. Windows is going to be the OS between Google on th elowend and Apple on the high end.

8. This should scare Intel and the x86 crowd as well. Google has said Chrome OS will run on ARM which will be a significant amount of Chrome OS netbooks, I'd imagine, because ARM chips cost a fraction of Intel chips, run cooler and can and match Intel's low end offerings in speed. Smaller, cooler chips allow formore attractive designs as well.

9. Chrome OS devices are going to be very inexpensive. Sergey Brin mentioned that Chrome Netbooks would cost something similar to Windows Netbooks. Um, no.

It isn't just that $25 in OS cost that the netbook makers will be saving. By going to a low capacity SSD, say starting at 8GB, instead of a hard drive, you are losing weight and price. Then consider that with an ARM chip, you are paying a fraction of what an Atom costs - which is already very low for a PC.

You won't need as much RAM to run Chrome OS either. Just being a kernel and a browser saves a lot on memory overhead. 512MB of RAM might be all you need. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see a sub-$100, base model Chrome OS PC, from a major vendor like Dell, HP, Acer, ASUS or Toshiba.

10. We haven't seen everything. We know Google likes surprises. Just like finding out about Google Navigator just a few days before the launch of the Droid, I'm sure Google is working on some extra secret special features. GPS, which is built into a lot of chipsets currently, seems to be the hot area right now and browsing with a GPS enabled browser would allow the Goog to throw up neighborhood relevant ads, which I think might be about to blow right up.

There is also the telecommunications component. With Google's recent Gizmo5 purchase, this thing will have everything it needs to be your mobile phone as well.

If you want to give Chrome a try (lackluster so far is my take), hed ovr 2 GDGT.

What People Are Saying

Yea

This is very useful and informative..thanks

Seth....you've gotta start

Seth....you've gotta start proof-reading your posts. Here and on 9to5. It's so bad sometimes.

yeah

yeah...what he said

This will change my life as much as

This will change my life as much as the Palm Pilot did.

Did I tell you I never bought a Palm Pilot?

I like the concept, but it'd

I like the concept, but it'd only be a "10% device" for me. 90% of the time I need something with local storage/apps. However, this would be great for traveling, where I really don't want data with me and a cheap device is a good idea (in case of loss/theft).

Nothing new

Sorry, big Google FAIL on this one.

You can't take things away from people & expect them to be happy. With Chrome, Google will be taking away the speed and functionality inherent in native, local applications.

What happens when you're somewhere without net access? It happens you know. How do you log into the cloud and get access to all your work then? Google Gears? No thanks.

I'm also not very comfortable with the idea that Google could potentially mine my personal and business documents, in order to generate targeted ads. No thanks, I'll keep all that stuff on my own laptop.

I worked for a company in 2001 that was doing a lot of very similar embedded Linux / web app development. We had numerous prototype tablets and small form-factor computing devices, all running a super-scaled down Linux distro that booted in 10 seconds or so from solid state memory (compact flash at the time).

Funny, the company is still around but they didn't make their millions with any of those products. It wasn't because they executed poorly, it wasn't because the technology didn't work. It was because when we put the devices in front of users, they wanted more. They wanted their full desktop experience, and they couldn't understand why they couldn't have it.

So, I don't see Google doing anything new here. In fact, I see them rehashing old technology and labelling it as "innovation". No thanks.

"Online only"

I'm really not buying that the system is only ever going to be useful while online and is only going to be good for trivial applications. Native Client built into the chrome browser provides what amounts to a virtual machine in every browser tab. You can already build a ton of Linux software for native client. Google has "ported" lots of libraries and several complex 3D applications from Linux to Chrome's NaCl. What's more, NaCl apps run in the Chrome browser (or in a chrome frame?). So they'll work on any OS running the Chrome browser. (i.e. all your favorite Linux apps running in the browser on any OS.) Combine that with other browser tech they've added like Gears and you've got something more impressive than it appears.

Chrome OS is useless in my

Chrome OS is useless in my opinion.

Chrome OS can make anything a web Appliance...

Web apps are only going to improve and Chrome OS will be there when they are ready to replace native apps...

However, I see a hugh potential in Chrome OS in making anything a web appliance, for example, what about and HD TV that has an input that boots up Chrome OS and you connect using wireless keyboard?

This will be a game changer, it's just going to take a little time...

wow

I have a sinking feeling that one day Google is going to rule the world.

RT
www.ultimate-privacy.br.tc