Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


5 reasons to worry about a Microsoft/Yahoo merger

Most mergers don't work. Different studies of past mergers show that 53% to 70% of mergers (depending on the study) failed to reach their financial goals.

Think: AOL TimeWarner. "This has the feel of AOL/Time Warner 2.0 until proven otherwise," says Dennis Berman, the star M&A journalist at The Wall Street Journal.

A takeover bid like this could scare away Yahoo's people assets, Berman says in his Deal Journal blog, although Microsoft has promised big retention bonuses for key engineers and execs.

How will combining two weak search players (MSN and Yahoo) yield a strong one? People will stop googling? Ha. As one commenter put it: "Tie two rocks together and they still sink."

The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division will be taking a look at this combo. Microsoft will argue that this is the only way to compete with the Google giant. That argument may work in a Republican administration, but it may not work in a Democratic administration next year.

Related Articles and Opinion

What People Are Saying

Microsoft and Google

If Microsoft wants to win they need to place more ads on Google. This will drive an insane volume of traffic to Microsoft sites and product/service offerings. I have an ad words account and I must say I would love to increase my daily limit to say... $1,000,000.00. Think of all the hits Microsoft would get! Countless millions of Google searchers would click on those ads each minute. AND! Wait! Microsoft could sign up for Google's Ad Sense and they could actually generate income. The best thing is, none of this requires activation.

Yahoo and MSN both has not

Yahoo and MSN both has not been able to provide a convincing search quality despite so many years of effort in research, combining both weak minds I doubt would produce any significant threat to Google's monopoly in search market, in fact I believe it would create even more problem after the merger, mixing people from different culture is not an easy task and it is going to take more time for both to deal with it than focusing on producing better search results.

phony philanthropist?

not sure what Bill Gates has to do with this...he doesn't even run M$ anymore, and I dog on Microsoft as much as the next guy, but I think phony philanthropist doesn't fit the "bill" at all...the Gates Foundation does amazing things for no other reason then to help people. You can hate Bill Gates for how he ran his company but you can't hate him for being generous with his money...he is only leaving 10 million of his billions to his children while the rest will be given away, that's not so phony at all

Bill Gates: Global Criminal

The idea of a Microsoft-Yahoo merger is both frightening and tempting. Microsoft is increasingly viewed as a hopelessly corrupt corporation, one that produces such jokes as Vista and "Internet Exploder." Yahoo also has a reputation as a right-wing hack.

So a Microsoft-Yahoo merger could actually frighten more people into the arms of Google and other competitors.

At any rate, it would be amusing to watch phony philanthropist Bill Gates destroy Microsoft and Yahoo both.

About Microsoft and Vista

Sometimes the name chosen speaks volume about the product. In this case of Microsoft Vista, In one of the most ancient languages of the world , Sanskrit, the word means "Excreation" or "Sh*t"

Wow your ignorance is

Wow your ignorance is overwhelming. First Microsoft is not "Evil" rather it is predictable, Microsoft is a demonstration of capitalism, meaning at the end of the day look at the bottom line.

2nd Yahoo right winged hack? How do you begin to justify this statement? Yahoo is very supportive of open source.

Google...Google does stuff well yes. And while they appear to be nice by not charging you instead they do data mining on you.

Have you ever contacted customer support of any of these companies? Google is by far the most unresponsive.

As for Bill Gates well I don't know how someone can be a "phony philanthropist" it is his money and his to spend. Frankly he is one the biggest philanthropists in the world, in the last couple years his personal net worth has gone down because of his charitable activities. I ask you MR. Blomstorm when was the last time you gave more than you made in a year to charity? My guess is never unless you do not have a job.

And because I know your type well I will put an end to your question right away...NO I DO NOT WORK FOR MICROSOFT! I happen to be an avid Linux user and supporter of open source technology.

About Microsoft's Charity

I think Charity is the best way to win public sympathy, and a way to blur public's perception of you and your ways of earning money. It is naive to think that the way of functioning of a person or an organization has changed because they are doing charity work. Think it as excess fat on the body. Shedding extra fat is a necessity and not a charity

Microsoft should first make

Microsoft should first make their main product to work properly - that's OS.
In general their products are worse and worse. Even their web line of products that is in focus now, doesn't work properly. For example Windows Live, unstable, unoptimised, etc..
They are using their strong position not to inovate.
What is the point of good/better/the best techical support, if you are selling crap to consumers?

Worse and worse....have not

Worse and worse....have not seen this deterioration in the quality of MS products. A simple fact is that software has bugs. Most people do not get this, I worked as a tester for another fortune 500 company and I can tell you MS is very good with there quality control compared to most companies that try to write software

Did you graduate

Allow me to digress, but I continuously find it incredibly shocking that most people can't spell. Makes you look like a juvenile or high school dropout. The correct word is "their"- possessive, not "there"- as opposed to "here." May sound petty, but without attention to detail, people can't write good software let alone grasp nuances.