Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Mike Elgan's picture
Mike Elgan

The World Is My Office

5 ways gadget blogs fail readers

Needless to say, I love gadget blogs. I read hundreds of them, and even write one or two. We gadget bloggers do a lot of things well, I think. For example, many are good at boiling down complex feature sets into concise, meaningful nuggets of useful information or conveying a sense of which products and features are most important, and which are not. Some excel at breaking stories. Others find and expose products nobody else seems to have known about. Still others are so engagingly written that they're fun to read even if you don't care about the products they're covering. However, there are five things many gadget bloggers do that, well, do a disservice to readers. I'm listing these not to bad-mouth my colleagues in the blogosphere, but as constructive criticism so the entire category improves.

Here they are: My five ways gadget blogs fail readers:

FAIL #1: No follow-up. Companies make claims all the time. For example, companies say their product will ship by, say, the end of March or "some time in Q1." Half the time, it seems, those claims turn out to have been wishful thinking or deliberate FUD. You don't have to report their claims. But if you do print company claims in your blog, make sure you follow up and tell your readers if the companies failed to stick to those claims. It's easy. Just set up an item in your calendar to remind yourself when deadlines pass. That way, you can hold companies accountable and avoid misleading your readers.

FAIL #2: Cover concepts as products. I love product concepts. They're fun to cover. But make sure you differentiate between actual products, with manufacturing, marketing and product support behind them, and concepts, which are often just some dude playing around with Adobe Illustrator. It's true that real products go through a concept phase. But that doesn't mean concepts go through a real product phase. Concept designers tend to be very good at creating awesome computer-generated images, but often fail to even suggest how their concepts would work. My advice to gadget bloggers is to go ahead and cover concepts. Just make sure you're crystal clear with readers that all they're looking at is a sketch dreamed up by someone who doesn't make products.

FAIL #3: Ignore IP theft. Successful consumer electronics tend to be copied by "shanzhai" counterfeiters in China. Shanzhai culture is fun to cover. But many gadget blogs make the mistake of treating them as the equals of legitimate products. Since the iPhone shipped, for example, several replica models have emerged in China, some even manufactured by large companies. Far too many gadget blogs covered these not as curious-but-illegal oddities, but seriously, like they were legitimate products. Many reported on the Meizu M8 mini One, for example, as "better than the iPhone" because it looked just like Apple's phone but had additional functionality, like an FM radio. Come on, Bloggers. The iPhone is a legitimate, legal, popular, significant device that many of your readers will actually buy. But 99.9% of your readers will never see a Meizu M8, a shady, illegal, illegitimate item that will never be sold legally in the US or Europe. Please don't cover them as if your readers will be choosing between one or the other.

FAIL #4: Write me-too reviews. Long ago, the Internet didn't exist. People got information about consumer electronics from newspapers and magazines. Each of these publications had to cover all the major products in their coverage areas, or readers would never find out about them. Don't look now, but those days are gone. Unless you have something new to report, don't report it! If someone wants to read the review consensus on a product, they'll search Google. If you're merely agreeing with that consensus, there's no reason to publish a me-too review.

FAIL #5: Too many items in lists. This isn't about gadgets per se, but about software and Web site coverage. Numbered lists are popular, but let's keep the numbers under control, people. 100 Essential Twitter tools. 200 free PC optimizers. 500 great iPhone apps. Come on. What's the value of lists are contain too many items for anyone to go through? Find the best five and junk the rest. More is not better. Do the readers a service and actually eliminate the duds for them.

What People Are Saying

I love gadgets blogs that

I love gadgets blogs that covers a range of latest emerging new digital technology, tech gadgets,electronics and cool geek gadgets.

print gets old fast

Unless print is delivered daily or weekly, I don't think the production cycle is going to be fast enough to keep up with covering new-tech gadgets. Editorial or longer-length stories I could do. People that read gadget blogs want a live twitter feed of an event as it happens.

You FAIL. All of your cons

You FAIL. All of your cons are stuck in old, and dying standards. And people who read gadget blogs generally aren't stuck in the old ways... Except with the exception of you. That is why I only need to read one gadget blog, and never touch your dying rags.

I agree 100%. I've heard

I agree 100%. I've heard the local homeless bum provide better insight than this article.

Typical

What a whiner.

Get a clue noob. Or get off the net.

I agree with everything on

I agree with everything on this list except the criticism of so-called, "me too" reviews. Multiple reviews of the same product on the same website or content provider would be redundant and stupid.

Multiple reviews of the same product from multiple websites/content providers are incredibly useful. Why, you may ask? It weeds out the shills from the real, honest reviewers. Real, honest reviewers use real, honest practices which provide real, honest results which will correlate with eachother regardless of who does the test.

A Phenom II X4 940 with 4 GB of RAM, Windows XP SP3, and a Radeon HD 4580 will perform the same as another Phenom II X4 940 with 4 GB of RAM, Windows XP SP3, and a Radeon HD 4580. An AMD shill would have to obnoxiously increase the numbers to fool around with people, and readers of multiple reviews would be able to see these numbers as clear outliers.

I used to agree with #4, but

I used to agree with #4, but I've come to realize over time that if your blog has any kind of serious readership, there's a very good chance that a percentage of your audience has never seen what you're covering, even if it's been covered already by all the big boys.

It's unrealistic to assume that the gadget-blog audience consists of all the same people reading the same blogs. If you have anything at all to add to the coverage, you shouldn't avoid covering it just because other gadget blogs have.

I disagree with #4. If your

I disagree with #4. If your blog has a fan base, why would you not supply them with your review of a product?

Sounds like some sour grapes to me personally.

How true!

Very nice piece; hope some of the gadget bloggers read it.

BTW, you seem to have one typo: "It's true that real products go through a product phase" is probably meant to be "It's true that real products go through a *concept* phase."

Most of this is pointed at

Most of this is pointed at engadget...lol