Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


A first look at KDE 4.3

I've never been a big fan of KDE 4.x. I really disliked the first versions, like KDE 4.04. But, over time, KDE became more useful and usable. By KDE 4.2, I finally saw a new version of KDE I could like. Now, with the "so close to release you can almost taste it," KDE 4.3 is the first of the KDE 4 family that I can wholeheartedly approve of.

Unlike previous versions, this edition, from release candidate 2 on, has run without any hiccups on both of my KDE systems. The first is a Dell Inspiron 530S powered by a 2.2-GHz Intel Pentium E2200 dual-core processor with an 800-MHz front-side bus. This test machine had 4GBs of RAM, a 500GB SATA (Serial ATA) drive, and an Integrated Intel 3100 GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) chip set. The other, a Lenovo ThinkPad R61, is powered by a a 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor T7500 and has 2GBs of RAM.

To check out this new version, I used openSUSE 11.1. SUSE and KDE developers have long worked hand in glove with each other. So, whenever you want to try out the latest versions of KDE, the easiest way to is to use one of the openSUSE KDE builds.

openSUSE KD# 4.3

What really struck me about this release aren't any of the new features. Instead, it was the improvement in its overall performance and looks that caught my attention.

The new desktop style, Plasma Air, is both very attractive and very flexible. It's a nice combination. I'm both happy with its default look and feel, and I appreciate that I can easily set it to working the way I want it to work.

One interesting improvement, which you'll need to look closely for, is that you can now reset the System Settings window so that it looks and acts like the KDE 3.x Control Center. Since, I still find that tree-view to be far more useful than the KDE 4.x default, I welcomed this change.

KDE 4.3 with a KDE 3.x look

Actually, that small change is indicative of a larger change for the better in KDE. One of my real problems with KDE 4.x was that its developers seemed to want to go their own way while ignoring the wishes of the KDE 3.x user community. Now, KDE 4's programmers are still moving forward with their desktop vision, but they're giving KDE 3's users the opportunity to use the new desktop in an old, familiar way.

If you've been avoiding KDE 4 because of that, or other issues, it's finally time to give it a try. I think you'll find, as I have, that this new KDE is finally ready to compete with its older sibling KDE 3.5.11 and GNOME 2.26 for anyone's Linux desktop.

What People Are Saying

KDE 4 is fine.

During KDE 4.0 and 4.1 I couldn't stand it. It wasn't usable, it froze, it was missing features, and I felt like just about everything was poorly implemented. Then I tried out 4.2 and I've been successfully using it as my full time desktop. The only current issues I have is bluetooth which I hoped to see fixed in 4.3 but other than that, I'm not missing all of the petty functionality I originally missed from 3.5.9. I've gotten used to the way 4.2 operates and I think it's a very successful desktop. Keep up of the good work KDE development team!

Are you high on something?

Here's an idea... Try right-clicking on the desktop and configure your desktop...

Oh, you say you can't do that, even though that would be the INTUITIVE THING to do?

How about right clicking on an archive file, and "extracting the archive"...

Can't do that either?

How about pressing Alt-d, then Alt-s within a second of each keystroke being the ONLY way of getting to the screen where you change Plasma? You know, because people who use desktop managers LIKE to have obscure KEYSTROKES to do OBVIOUS things...

I just wasted half a night installing KDE4.3 on my computer, and I can honestly say that it BROKE... MY... COMPUTER...

But no... KEEP being a cheerleader for the worst desktop manager since Windows 3.1... I'm sure it won't screw anyone up...

/s

Uh huh...

You can do the first thing, it only changed the name to "Appearance Settings".

And the second one, too: it even has more options than before.

If you don't like, then use the Desktop cashew as a shortcut to "Appearance Settings" and "Folder View Settings".

Kwin is still unstable, I agree on that. But it's a hell of a lot faster than before.

KDE 4.2 is not actually that bad OR stupid. It's just, well, different. KDE 4.3 builds on that, so if you don't like the difference, well...good luck getting your computer fixed! Please don't say a swan is a crappy duck, 'cause then you need your Brain fixed, too.

I hated kde 3.5 in OpenSUSE except for Konqueror's multipurpose wonder. Could never make it work with Compiz, ever, and it had no effects, so KDE 4 makes sense.

"But no... KEEP being a

"But no... KEEP being a cheerleader for the worst desktop manager since Windows 3.1... I'm sure it won't screw anyone up..."

LOL, that is the best description of kde4 I have seen to date.

It sure is pretty but it sure makes wincrap 3.1 look GOOD.

Someone mentioned to me that the folks responsible for the kde4 debacle undoubtedly have access to better drugs and are not required to actually use the thing. Probably been shoveled off into a back office but somehow this peice of fecal matter actually saw the light of day.

The kde3.5 devs are probably spinning in their graves to see how badly a very functional desktop manager has been screwed up.

Sigh.

Right clicking and selecting

Right clicking and selecting "Folderview settings" allows you to configure plasma. And extracting the archive works when you have ark installed.

Next time, think before you spread FUD.

.... only KDE 3!

I feel your pain!... I have just spent an hour on a live CD of Fedora 11 x86_64 and cannot see any reason to leave KDE 3.5.9 ..I think that perhaps KDE 5 should it ever surface, might gain a nano-second of my attention! ..."DONT FIX WHAT AINT BROKE" ... back to my trusty, fully working Fedora 8. Goodnight KDE 4, Vista, Win7 and all other clone-crap desktops!

Competing with KDE 3.5??!!

Hi all,

I tried extensively KDE 4.3 final release, and I think not only it can't compete with KDE 3.5, but it's not even comparable, considering the lack of applications, the lack of features in the ported applications, the lack of speed and reliability.

I think the developers have done an incredibly job, the challenge was and still is enormous, and I don't think it's humanly possible to do more. What I can't understand is why the developers just stopped listening to the community and went their own way.

I think a look at the figures on KDE usage are worth a look...

JMTC, jco

Trolly troll troll.

Thanks for coming out.

Unlike you, I appreciate the KDEv's effort, see that they very clearly have not abandoned anyone, and only use their desktop because it is superior to any alternative. Sure not every app I use is KDE, but as many as are ready.

I only look forward to more and more apps passing the bar now.

Have a great day, and remember that if you don't like it, it's open source, so put your complainative energy into programming for a change. I for one am not buying the validity of your desperate "points," and don't really need to see them repeated anymore.

I have been a Windows user

I have been a Windows user up till 2008. At the end of 2005, I almost decided to switch to linux. I was tired of the Windows XP look and needed some change. I have thought of switching to Linux and KDE 3.5 looked attractive. Then Microsoft introduced Vista and I decided to wait for that.

My initial experience with Vista was horrible, it frose the first 6 months at random moments. But I did like the new search features and desktop effects so much that I also didn't want to go back to XP (or KDE 3.5 for that matter) anymore.

Then on youtube, I saw some KDE 4.2 movies (back then still a RC) and I was sold. This was just as beautifull as MS Windows/Mac OSX 10.5.

I radically moved to Linux, I have no dual-boot. It was a steep learning curve, because I wasn't aware that many things were so Microsoft dependent. But I enjoyed (the look) of my Linux desktop every day.

If KDE 3.5 suits your needs, that's good for you. But the mainstream user (like me) wants a good looking OS. Just as mainstream driver wants a good looking car. So if you want Linux to gain popularity, the outdated looks of GNOME or KDE3 is most definately not the way to forward.

KDE4.3

Yes , i fully agree with you...

Thanks for the nice comments...