Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

A preview peek at Windows 7 screenshots

The Russian site What's Next? has posted what is says is a gallery of screenshots of Windows 7. I have no idea if this is real, but if it is, at the moment, the interface doesn't look a whole lot different than Windows Vista. But it does show a nifty new feature that every Windows user will welcome.

In the gallery, there's little to distinguish what you see from Windows Vista, as you can see from one sample screen, below.

Windows 7 screenshot

But if you look at the screenshot posted of a listing of all Control Panel items, below, you'll see something new I've pointed to that's very intriguing --- the Recovery Center.

Windows 7 Recovery Center

As far as I can tell, the Recover Center will allow you to restore a damaged Windows installation without having to reinstall the whole operating system from disk. Better yet, it will let you do that, without you having to lose any of your data.

Also notable is a new HomeGroup feature, which appears to be a home networking refinement that makes it easier to share media with others on your network. Another Windows 7 feature makes it easer to pin items to the Start menu.

Apart from that, the basic interface is the same, as are the icons, the gadgets, the Start button and pretty much everything else you can see. That should surprise no one, though --- not uncommonly at the early development stage, they're working on the plumbing rather than the interface. So even if the gallery of screenshots is real, that isn't to say that Windows 7 will look anything like what you see there.

What People Are Saying

windows 7

how can u be so sure about the screens if the beta version didn't released yet

Fake or not fake, it doesn't matter

Fake or not fake, it doesn't matter, the author himself says he doesn't know whether it is real or not, too. What this article is all about, is the recovery center. That sounds good, and although it is necessary, it will be a bloated recovery tool for fixing a bloated operating system. In my personal point of view, before thinking of fixing tools, MS should think about the dirty design of the WINDOWS directory, where all kind of garbage fits. MS should enforce 3rd party software to be where it belongs: Into its own directory. The same for the registry, the common files and so on. Do you imagine a Chevy that has all kinds of 3rd party components behind the hood? ...adaptors (like drivers), subsystems (like frameworks), sub-engines and other components (like dlls), and even garbage into its engine? And will you still expect GM to have it fixed, even with customizations of *any* vendor into its engine? That's not impossible, but with the current 3rd party software installation practices the complexity is growing at a speed rate never seen in the past. You cannot take for granted that users will not install garbage. They don't have any way to know what's inside that setup.exe or setup.msi, even if they were technically able to handle it. Virus and malware writers are making fun of Windows, as long as there's no way of telling the OS "deinstall everything but Microsoft stuff". MS should protect its own ass clearly separating the Windows area of the rest of the software, thus, allowing themselves to take control of a Windows installation. I may be wrong, I may be inaccurate, I may be saying stupidities... But I'm sure my feelings about C:\WINDOWS are shared by some people.

Windows 7 discussion

I agree with Gus, in that windows should keep itself completely separate from anything else installed after OS. Run the DLL's and such from within the chosen installation dir. Program settings and personalizations should also be stored elsewhere. There is no reason to store all of that in the "my xxx" folders. Why not keep all profiles and settings wherever the user places them? It's a simple matter of allowing the user control by dialogue box at install. That way, you could reinstall the OS without touching installed programs, settings, etc. whenever the registry got too bloated or malware was introduced. One obvious problem with that approach is that it would put a lot of computer techs out of business. The current schema is beyond the layman on reinstallations. Perhaps theres security issues I'm not taking into account. It seems pretty simple to me. I put all of the user profiles and such on a sep. partition, but I'm an IT guy. Most people wouldn't have the first clue about the need to do that, let alone HOW to do it.

Currently "My Ducument" and

Currently "My Ducument" and share folders are in the C drive. Why can't MS make all data folders default to another partition and also incorporate "Ghost" like back up in this partition so to make back up and restore of all program files easier.

That feature can already be acomplished

That feature you are requesting can already be done by redirecting the My Docs folder to another drive (partition) and the ghost like back up be performed on it with out a new version of windows...sorry :)

that's true but...

If the proposed feature could be packaged in a system "Layout and Backup Center" able to make recommendations, create a virtual drive if needed, and configure the backup. it would be a big help to a lot of people.

Duped

Looks like Computerworld has been duped as the screenshots are clearly modified screenshots of a Windows Vista Ultimate install that has not been activated.

Okay, Microsoft has used the

Okay, Microsoft has used the classic theme on Windows for how long. Do you HONESTLY think they're going to completely re-design the already quite nice looking operating system, that Vista is, just for a new version of Windows that's going to fix up whatever people seem to be complaining about with Vista? No, I didn't think so.
People seriously need to stop acting like idiots, and accept that not everything you see is fake, and you're only making yourself look stupid by accusing it as such. Thank you.

fake...

I would agree that this is just a modded version of Vista Ultimate. (probably just used VLite or something to change some things).
At best, this could be a beta of Vista SP2 which is more likely at this early stage...

Not Fake....

No. I don't think it's a fake. Since it's a Milestone build... it has to be run over Vista. Thus... it looks like Vista:D

Until the the final releases. It's still too early to judge what Windows 7 will look like.

I expect it will come out around in late 09 or even in 2010.

We'll just have to wait and see... :D