Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Another day, another Microsoft lie

You can count on Microsoft pulling the fake research report trick at least once a year. It's always the same. They'll report some result that makes them look good and/or their competition look bad from an 'independent' source, but not mention that they paid for the results, had their own people do the report, and usually manage the research. This time around it's a study by ClickStream Technologies, which found Microsoft Office, to be far more popular than OpenOffice.org, which in turn was far more popular than Google Docs. What Microsoft doesn't mention is that ClickStream is headed by Microsoft's former head of Microsoft Office research. Very independent, eh?

Boycott Novell did some digging about this latest Microsoft study, and found, just underneath the dirt's surface that ClickStream's senior research analyst is also a former Microsoft Corporation researcher and strategist for the Office product. If you buy that this study will say anything except what Microsoft wants it to say, I have some early-release, Detroit Lion SuperBowl tickets you might also want to buy. Cheap!

So why is Microsoft doing this? It's no secret that Microsoft Office is the most popular office suite around. I think that the goal is to make Google Docs look less significant than it really is. After all, while OpenOffice 3.0 is an excellent free and open-source office suite. Microsoft had held OpenOffice off with one hand tied behind its back. So, Microsoft doesn't worry about OpenOffice or its commercial versions, Sun's StarOffice and IBM's Symphony. Google Docs, that's another story.

Microsoft, and in particular Steve 'Why is this man still the CEO?' Ballmer, are obsessed by Google. I mean, Ballmer, with a straight face, even recently compared the fragile Microsoft David to the big, mean Google Goliath. In the case of Google Docs, Microsoft has real reason to worry. Google Docs represents a real threat to Microsoft Office and its revenue stream. If you haven't used it, you should give it a try. It's an excellent, light-weight office suite, and, unlike Microsoft Office, you can run it on Windows, Macs, Linux, or, if you're a glutton for punishment, you can even try to use it on some mobile phones.

What we have here is Microsoft, in its classic style, tries to sweep Google Docs under the rug with this study's 'proof' that Docs is an also-ran. While Microsoft hopes to thus freeze customers from giving Google Docs a try, it will gain more time to try to get its own Windows Live applications working better and for Windows 7 to arrive, which will require the use of online applications.

Will Microsoft get away with it? Well, if you believe what Microsoft tells you in its 'independent' studies, they'll have a better chance of it. Personally, I hope you keep in mind that Microsoft has been lying about the competition for decades now and that non-Microsoft products and services are often both cheaper and better than Microsoft's own. Sometimes, as in the came of both OpenOffice and Google Docs, they won't cost you a thin dime to try. So, no matter who you believe, I urge you to try both Microsoft Office alternatives for yourself. I think you'll like them.

What People Are Saying

Looks like ClickStream and Google already have a relationship...

If ClickStream is a Microsoft front, why would Google host ClickStream's CEO for a talk at the Googleplex?

http://clickinsight.clickstreamtech.com/?p=24

And all I had to do was Google "clickstream technologies google"

So, what's new?

When MS lies, or our own government for that matter, it's more of a reflection on the human species than the MS corporation. Every time a large corporation's ill behavior, or those of their highest ranking staff, makes it to the headlines, there is a sigh of relief from every other corporate headquarters, since they too are involved in the same shenanigans. It's the nature of the corporate structure, and the humans that run it.
But beneath the 'corporate' label which gets most of the blame, lies the real problem with an open market: the stock market. The notion of foisting your company's worth, and the worth and livelihood of it's employees, on the shoulders of a few 'fat cats' is ludicrous from the start, since the resulting house of cards is built upon the notion that those shoulders belong to people with actual dedication to your company rather than to the dollar they have to invest. Any company based on such an amoral, profit-motivated structure would ruthlessly devour it's last morsel of moral conscience trying to appease the 'host' donors. So they lie. And what's new?

> as in the came of both

> as in the came of both OpenOffice

s/came/case/

There is no cover up.

Vaughan-Nichols asserts that the Boycott Novell blog dug up a conspiracy by revealing ClickStream Technologies' CEO is a former head of research for Microsoft Office. In fact, this is openly stated on ClickStream's web site as well in my original story for Computerworld, along with Turner's denial that the study's results were paid for by Microsoft (though he concedes Redmond is a client).

If ClickStream is a Microsoft front, then would Adobe, as I wrote, pay ClickStream good money to do research for them? Or would ClickStream offer research services for Linux and Mac software developers?

And if Boycott Novell is so prescient, then why did it call ClickStream a "small and obscure company which is located in Asia."

I know a lot of Asians attend UC Berkeley, but this is the first time I've heard Berkeley, California described as being geographically located in Asia.

Would A do B if C?

Well, I don't know, maybe.

nothing new...

Microsoft making such claims is nothing new.

Software Coorperations are not much different from politicians, in that they are trying to make an IMAGE and portray the competition in a negative image.

But, it is still good that the 'CYBER CYNIC' is here to publish it strait and let loose the truth.

This marketing, and that is all it is, should not go unchecked...

We all know in the end what will happen...

Thanks,
Matt K.

Bio/Background No Secret

Nobody had to do any "digging" to find the bio/background of Clickstream's management team. It's clearly listed on the company's web site, because the company has nothing to hide.

BTW, their product/service line includes both Mac and Linux offerings.

Google is no saint

Microsoft Office IS more popular. Saying that doesn't mean much.

What it particularly DOESN'T mean is "Microsoft Office is better!"

But don't jump on the Google Docs bandwagon just yet.

While they may have a nice interface, their EULA leaves a lot to be desired. Unless you're in a corporate contract with them then they have irrevocable rights to use YOUR documents however they please, including sharing YOUR documents with their partners.

So enjoy Google Docs. Just don't write anything in there that you want to keep secret or plan on copyrighting, because Google will practically have equal access rights to it indefinitely.

Instead, try OpenGoo... a self-hostable online alternative to Google Docs. Or use Open Office.

Evil corporations can go jump in a lake.

MS needs to be scared

There is nothing wrong in SJVN's observation. He points out that Google docs is really a threat. It is absolutely true. I never use MS office because I have both OO and Google docs. MS stuff is bloated and the documents and powerpoints you produce aren't great either in comparison with the competition.

Another day, another silly MS bashing blog

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is so blinded by his obsessive hatred of Microsoft, that he can't think straight. It's just one silly MS bashing blog after another. Talk about "objective".