Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Apple 'brick' is a manufacturing process

With the brick rumor information out of the way, now we can all speculate what this new Apple manufacturing means. Has Apple simply outsourced a rapid prototyping facility in Asia or is Steve Jobs fulfilling an 18 year old dream to move up the value chain in the production of computers?

In 1990, Fortune did a piece on Jobs' new production facilities in Fremont California for NeXT. It was, at the time,...

THE ULTIMATE COMPUTER FACTORY, Steve Jobs has built a Next workstation plant with just about everything: lasers, robots, speed, and remarkably few defects.

There was a great deal of effort put into the facility:

Until recently the 40-person manufacturing staff had more Ph.D.s than the group designing the NeXT machine.

But alas, the NeXT hardware didn't gain traction so the facility never really got to push out equipment as Jobs would have hoped. But, as the story goes, the NeXT software was eventually bought by Apple and became the basis for Apple's OSX.

Fast forward a decade and a half. Apple is firing on all cylinders and has $20 billion in the bank. People are speculating all over on what Apple is going to do with all of that money. Buy Adobe, Nintendo, Sony, etc, etc.

John Martellaro of the Mac Observer a few months ago came up with a brilliant idea. Apple should slide down the value chain a little and build its own plant for manufacturing components. His arguments:

A far more serious threat, in the long term, would be a disruption to Apple's manufacturing and supply lines due to factors beyond its control. For example, a confrontation between the U.S. and China over the environment, resources, or Taiwan would seriously impact Apple.

China is struggling mightily to recover its self confidence and stature in the world. The 2008 Olympics in Beijing are going a long ways towards doing that, and the U.S. knows that China and the U.S. are both partners and adversaries. At some point in the future, however, if that relationship were to sour over some larger issue, Apple, depending as it does on China for the manufacture of its iPods and iPhones, would be out of business.

Manufacturing in the 21st Century

How would Apple, with the correct application of a large sum of money, fulfill Mr. Jobs' grandest stated and unstated goals as well as deal with potential future threats to the company?

Obviously, there is a lot of negative thinking in this mentality. "It is cheaper to build in Asia." has been the mantra for the past few decades. Apple, however, has a history of thinking different. They went into building Apple Stores when the retail electronics market was heading south fast.

So where would Apple put such a factory?

At first blush, one might think about a plant in Mexico or Canada, but that's old style thinking. It's based on the idea, again, that labor costs have to be kept low. However, in this case, the ongoing labor costs will be almost non-existent except for some managers, overseers, and some technicians to keep the production line running smoothly.

Also, when thinking about locating a factory, companies have traditionally looked at locations where electricity is cheap. Again, that's 20th century thinking. This time, Apple could seriously think about making its own electricity with renewable resources: wind and solar power. With enough power at its disposal, water exiting the plant could be as clean as that going into it.

There are a few places in the U.S. where the two come together in order to insure a steady supply of power. New Mexico comes to mind. Near Roswell N.M. (Elida) there is a single wind plant that's generating 120 megawatts. The southwestern U.S. is also the only place where solar power can be consistently relied on, and other candidates are locations in west Texas, Arizona and California with good access to the Interstate system.

But building a plant would cost billions of dollars. And in case anyone hadn't informed Steve Jobs, the country is in a recession. Oh, Apple innovates out of recessions.

Such a plant, run by robots and Macs, would be expensive to build. In the long run, however, the economic and political advantages of such a plant would be enormous. Apple would stop sending money to China and suffering from continuing scrutiny over labor conditions in a foreign country. The plant would become a poster child for modern, 21st century manufacturing. Imagine Steve Jobs taking the next president of the United States on a tour of a plant that makes its own electricity, cleans its own water and cranks out millions of iPods and iPhones each month. And sends power back into the grid on occasion to power our plug-in hybrids.

Could it be that Apple's acquisition of PA Semi is the first step in this line of thinking? Assembly is the first step, but eventually making many of its own components would further improve Apple's bottom line.

OK, back to reality. What is Apple really about?

In the end, however, the real goal is to make exciting products that cost less to make than the competition could ever achieve. When combined with the next generation Apple products that use a gesture language instead of mice, Apple could surge far ahead of the competition and achieve Mr. Jobs' goals. Apple would be creating dazzling and beautiful consumer electronics that no one else on the planet can touch in price or technical vision.

An Apple factory (or two), in the right place, costing several billions would be a worthy endeavor for Apple and its cash. It would achieve the grandest goals for Apple's technical future, make a contribution to the planet and its people's well being and help insure Apple's financial and political security.

But, sigh, it's just an idea.

An idea that is getting a lot of traction right now.

What People Are Saying

alternate manufacturing processes

There are many possible ways of making parts out of metals like aluminum (or magnesium) which have a relatively low melting point and relatively low viscosity when molten. Besides those discussed already - stamping from sheets and milling from a block - one could also consider various casting processes (e.g. die casting or lost-foam casting) and even injection molding. If Apple is seriously considering taking manufacturing in-house, I'm sure they will carefully explore options beyond CNC milling. Lost-foam casting is already widely used to make complex auto parts. However, I think injection molding would be the most technologically aggressive approach, and it would make sense at very high volumes.

Breakthrough brass/copper manufacturing process ...

THIS is what the Brick really IS -- it is all about laser welding. Noting copper can be red like a brick although brass would make one awesome laptop box ...

Http://www.copper.org/applications/automotive/radiators/no_flux.html#Introduction

Your source has been mislead by Apple !

Laser fabrication

The laser's aren't used for milling as with a traditional CNC. Apple will be using a method similar to Metal Laser Sintering. What's cool about the technology is that it can be used from everything from the case to the printer circuit boards with 10-micrometer resolution traces. With everything automated and completely customizable, Apple could come out with a hundred different designs, and switch dynamically on the assembly line based on customer orders.

HERE IS WHAT THE BRICK REALLY IS ...

It is a heat sink that evolves hydrogen when HOT to power an airobic battery and return power for the extra power spent !!!

Don't YOU have ANY imagination ???

Comments on recent speculation

Wow what big speculations, enough to get really excited!

No matter what a MacBook update is definitely long over due:

1) Casing: Apart from minor changes, the biggest being an integrated iSight camera, there has been no redesign of apple’s laptop casings for the past five years! This is huge amount of time to stagnate for a retail tech product, Such a wait deserves a big revelation! Granted Apple and consumers have been very proud of the laptop design, but being the proud owner of a Powerbook that was part of the initial redesign five years ago, it still does not feel right to buy a new Macbook Pro when the product casing looks exactly the same. Sure intel is dramatically more preferment than Power PC but if your computer life cycle is 3-5 years that means you will have been with the same aesthetic computer design for 6-10 years, which is virtually unheard of in the tech industry.

2) MacBook technology: The last MacBook tech update in Feb 2008 but was received as a “fake” since nothing changed apart from a minor processor and ram increase. The last two real updates occurred in June 2007 when the screens changed to LEDs and Oct 2006 when the second generation intel chips were released – the first generation released when MacBook Pros initially launched Jan-April 2006. We are talking about over 15 months since a real update in hardware in an industry which averages 6-8 month life span.

Apple has recently earned an est. 15-20% of PC/Laptops market share which is a huge increase since Steve Jobs retook on an official CEO position at Apple to resuscitate the company from near extinction (5% market share) 8 years ago. Apple’s computer market share growth has been thanks to its headlines in product design, break boundaries in product specifications, OS upgrades, interface innovations and hardware change from power PC to Intel. But apart from the MacBook Air, Apple computers have not been in the spotlight (note I am talking about computers and not MP3 players) for sometime. if Apple wants to further increase their market share, which I am sure is one of their top priorities, they will need to get back into the limelight with big announcements. A new laptop is due and is a short term fix, but ownership of its own manufacturing line such as the factory being rumored would indeed be a lot more significant.

Could such a manufacturing factory be in the pipeline? Sure:

1) The factory is in line with Steve Jobs’ past endeavors, world interests, and the fact that Apple products are made with mostly recyclable materials.

2) Lead by Jobs’s environmentally conscious business acumen, Apple’s forums have recently made a point of including new green production charts, a check list demonstrating apple’s self imposed environmentally aware manufacturing goals from product assembly to delivery/product packaging.

3) Such a factory would be a poster child for future manufacturing, and be a milestone success to the responsible party.

4) A wise investment in today's economic climate as the company becomes more self sufficient and less exposed to other companies and foreign markets.

Will all of this be announced on October 14th:

1) Indeed October has been historically a common Month to make MacBook announcements, but the rush set October 14th as the date was largely due to speculators back tracking on their promises of updates last month (when Apple suspiciously renamed their September 9th conference as a ‘Let’s Rock’ event).

2) Is the ‘brick’ manufacturing process feasible? Since the casing is a cheap, yet strong, and highly recyclable, a point that Jobs has emphasized in this last period, it appears that the main issue is turnaround time since traditional laser carving can take several hours per unit. But that is the beauty of the tech industry, what appears impossible today is a reality tomorrow – in this instance a new laser carving machine which doesn’t sound implausible.

3) The current economic crisis tends to provoke a rush of new products to help boost share prices but would BIG announcement such as a self-sufficient factory be better announced in January 09 with a full PR whirlwind to back it up?

I guess we will see in just a few days, seems very soon.

jb247

P.S. I also can’t help to think that both the speculated ‘brick’ manufacturing process and the MacBook update can be mutually exclusive (for now) and that the aluminum carving can be referred to a more simple product design such as: a new ebook (I can not wait for Apple to come out with one), a tablet, Mac mini, Mac Pro, a new product in the home media sector, etc.

badly written but makes sense

The errors in grammer make it difficult to read, but the overall content makes sense. I don't see why a full PR 'whirlwind' campaigne can't happen in, what, 7 days...

Watch your words.

You should be correcting your own grammar and SPELLING mate.

Next was his second factory.

Next was his second factory. I got the chance to walk the factory floor at the "NEW" Mac factory in Fremont. It was the most talked about factory in the USA at the time (around 1984). As I recall the press reports said no people were required to build a Mac (but how many people do you need to put 128K into a computer?)

Good catch ...

Thanks for the correction, I knew that and it was bugging me -- a lot !!!

Almost posted the correction myself.

I remember the young Jobs being on the front of US News or something like that and thinking he is awfull young to be doing something like THAT, that requires great BREATH of knewledge.

I would have have been in my 20s or teens at the time !!!

Carving out of one piece is

Carving out of one piece is not nonsense. If you open the current macbook pro, you will see there re many pieces that are spotwelded in place. Every one of those pieces needs to be stamped, bent, and threaded where necessary. This requires a lot of processes, and requires them all to be placed so they can be welded. This causes the cost to go up. My company had a similar product, which was assembled from stamped metal parts, in the long run we found it cheaper to machine the same thing out of one piece of aluminum, since the cnc machines cost less than humans.