Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Seth Weintraub's picture
Seth Weintraub

Apple versus Google

Apple's biggest innovation for 2008? The iPhone App Store

I know 2008 is far from over and we have many more Apple products to look forward to. It just seems to me that Apple has already profoundly changed the technology landscape again, and people are starting to realize it. In a few years time when we are drawing up the yearly Apple timeline, 2008 will be known for one thing...

This time, the game changer isn't some shiny, sleek hardware or innovative new ways of making an operating system hum, it is the way that Apple's third-party developer environment has been set up. The iPhone App store simply makes the old way of distributing software seem primitive.

Apple learned from their market-leading iTunes Music and Video Store that they could distribute music over the Internet and sell lots of devices. Apple publicly claims to only be trying to break even in their store endeavors and in turn sell more music and video devices... but surely they wouldn't thumb their nose at a bit of profit. Apple could have also seen what was happening in the Sidekick realm. The App Store borrows heavily from the Danger/Sidekick ecosystem.

Also, Apple had mild success selling click-wheel iPod applications like PacMan through iTunes.

The biggest inspiration probably came from the Installer.app and Cydia "Stores" that developed on Jailbroken iPhones. These environments sprung up as a means to distribute hacked applications and after only a year were modern distribution platforms. Apple did well to take their inspiration.

They've hit all of the points. Apple takes a reasonable but substantial cut of the developer money...but they offer quite a bit in exchange. They build the developer environment and continue adding updates to the SDK. They also market the applications through the iTunes stores and their website. They take care of the credit card transactions and payment processing. They even host the files for downloading.

By most indications it is a huge success. Apple announced that 10 million App (probably mostly free) were downloaded on the first weekend alone. Popular free App like Facebook and Tap Tap revolution have already surpassed one million downloads each.

Big developers from many other platforms have been lining up to build applications. Oracle has an application. Salesforce is on the iPhone. SAP is on the way. Microsoft is even said to be working on iPhone applications.

The big difference, however, with this model is that small developers can build successful applications without a large company to back them up. One such developer, Eliza Block, who I met at the wine bar below my apartment, has been extremely successful with her crossword puzzle application called 2across. I watched as she frantically got it ready for the App store opening and subsequently climbed the charts. Much to her surprise, she is currently making around $2000/day. The App store has allowed her to make a career out of programming for the iPhone. There are many more like her.

Though the store seems wildly successful, some recent events have taken the luster off of the store. Apple has removed some popular applications without releasing information on why. One application creates a Wifi tether for your laptop to jump on the 3G network. Additionally, Apple removed a $1000 application called "I am rich" which was basically just an image of a diamond. Obviously a trick/publicity stunt. Also, the App store security has been compromised, leading some to wonder if pirated App will become available for distribution on jailbroken iPhones.

These little hiccups aside, Apple looks to have moved up the value chain in software distribution and revoltionized the software industry. The model will be hard, if not impossible, for its competitors to copy....perhaps that's why Microsft purchased Danger earlier this year for $500 Million...it certainly wasn't for the Java-based Sidekick OS.

Do you think Apple will try to bring this software distribution to the Macintosh? ...There is always 2009.

 

Like this Apple blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed!

What People Are Saying

Serious

You people are ridiculous. You're attacking this guy for nothing. It seems like you're accusing him of taking himself too seriously but it's you guys that take YOURSELVES too serious. This guy has the where-with-all to create a public forum to express his views and pursue his craft, and you have to tear him down. It's pathetic. And people like you are on every dang forum I visit. I wonder what has happened in the world to create such angry people. I use the Internet for email and research purposes, I think it's overwhelmingly obvious that you folks have fallen into using the Internet as your connection to the world and in the process you've lost all of your social skills. App Store, Apps Store - don't you have anything better to do than attack Seth? I came here looking for information on the Apple iPhone App Store and I got it. Good article, Seth.

Really?

I agree with serious. Very nice article. If you have enough time to pick apart internet blogs on technicalities than you my friend, need to get laid. Get a life.

Wine bar? Are you serious?

"...who I met at the wine bar below my apartment..."

Wow. Not sure why, but when I read that my eyes hurt.

What, is this your personal diary or an Internet facing article? Are we supposed to think that's cool? And what exactly is a "wine" bar versus the other kind of bar? (You know, the one "bad" people go to, like alcoholics and poor people.) Like, are you aiming to make your blog the computerworld equivalent of Sex in the City?

You are a douchebag.

Really?

So the term "wine" as a descriptor for bar offends your sensibilities? What if I had used sports bar or dive bar? Perhaps if you are so easily offended you should stay off the Internet.

Also, Personal diary? This is what is called a "blog" Check the URL. Unfortunately, it can't speak to every demographic.

I'd really like to know if

I'd really like to know if Apple is making any profits directly from the App Store or is that 30% that Apple receives just enough for it to break even after running the App Store services. I'm wondering if the App Store is still just a small part of the the iTMS ecosystem that keeps the hardware sales flowing. It's just that Steve Jobs seemed so excited about it. Maybe once the App Store reaches some certain critical mass in sales, it becomes a goldmine for Apple.

Naturally the free apps generate zero profit, but they do lure people into the App Store for paid apps. What Apple needs is some $20 apps that the majority iPhone users can't do without. That would be a great boost in profits if tens of millions of iPhone users downloaded them. Apple Pro Apps for the iPhone made exclusively by Apple. Something like iWork for the iPhone.

Also..

Isn't the jailbreak app called "cydia" not "cyndia"?

Cydia

He called it Cydia. Unless he missed it somewhere else. I don't know what you're talking about.

Title

Not to correct you unnecessarily, but throughout the article you refer to it as the Apps store, when it is correctly called the App Store. Is there a reason for calling it something different?

I probably got confused with

I probably got confused with Google Apps. Corrected.