Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


British plan allows police to hack into home PCs-without warrants.

Privacy and civil liberties groups who lament the erosion of privacy rights in this country might want to pay heed to what's happening across the pond in the United Kingdom.

According to several media reports out of the country the British Home Office has approved a plan that allows for an expansion of warrantless searches of people's home computers by police and M15 intelligence agents. Under the plan, law enforcement agents can basically hack into anybody's personal computer without any need for prior approval and covertly search through the contents of its hard drive including e-mails and Web browsing history. Well, so much for all those quaint notions about personal privacy.

Apparently, all that is needed apparently for a police officer to initiate such a search is a go-ahead from a chief constable. Seriously. According to a story in The Sunday Times,"a remote search can be granted if a senior officer says he 'believes' that it is 'proportionate' and necessary to prevent or detect serious crime" which is defined as any offence that is likely to attract a jail term of more than three years. There's just so much wrong with that approach it's hard to know where to even begin.

The Home Office's move apparently follows a decision by the European Union's council of ministers in Brussels to expand the implementation of a statute permitting the warrantless surveillance of private property. The plan allows police officers across the EU to ask their British counterparts to initiate a search of a British subject's personal computer. Presumably British law enforcement will have the same privilege though none of the articles I read made that clear.

As if all this isn't scary enough, what's really remarkable about the Home Office's move (at least according to the media reports) is the fact that none of this activity is controlled by any legislation or judicial oversight, at least for the moment. According to the Times article, British police say that such searches have already been going on in limited fashion for sometime now and are vital to stopping pedophiles, ID thieves and terrorists.

Maybe they are right and these searches are helpful. But the impunity with which such warrantless searches can be conducted and the apparent lack of oversight over them is what makes the whole notion so troubling, to say the least. The British are already among the world's most spied upon people thanks to their own government. Perhaps they have so gotten used to the notion of Big Brother that they have become blasé about the whole thing. Perhaps that's why there hasn't been more protest.

What People Are Saying

Remote search

What if their so-called evidence points them to performing a remote-search on a home computer in the U.S.? What then? I know I would have a problem with a "Bobby" remote searching my home computer in the U.S.

If they have the ability to remote search, it would seem to me they have had this ability for awhile and is now being made public. I wonder how many computers they have already breached?

'Perhaps they have so gotten

'Perhaps they have so gotten used to the notion of Big Brother that they have become blasé about the whole thing. Perhaps that's why there hasn't been more protest.'

Or perhaps the opportunity to utilise methods traditionally employed to protest, i.e. marches, are being squashed by new laws. British people are rapidly losing their right to protest against their loss of rights to protest! Many don't even realise it's happening. Those that do, find their way blocked by new terrorism laws which it would appear are able to be quoted for just about any activity involving the public PEACEFULLY disagreeing with the government.

Criminal Trespass?

Would it not be criminal trespass for someone to defeat the firewall of someone else’s computer and enter without first asking the owner?