Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Can IBM save Lotus from the Microsoft onslaught?

Microsoft has IBM in its cross-hairs, aiming to kill Lotus Notes and replace it with SharePoint. But Microsoft will have a tough time, because IBM, rather than Microsoft, seems to have gotten religion when it comes to Web 2.0.

A little over a week ago, according to Network World, Microsoft did a bit of chest-beating, and Microsoft COO Kevin Turner crowed at the company's annual meeting for financial analysts, "Let’s talk about replacing Lotus Notes."

Turner boasted that "This past year we sold in 4.86 million seats of our collaboration solution – SharePoint, Exchange and Office – into IBM Lotus Notes accounts," and promised to do more of the same.

According to the article, IBM shot back that one-third of its SameTime customers were companies with Microsoft Exchange installed.

The question remains, though, can Microsoft do it? Notes is the application that IT staff loves, but everyone else seems to hate. I spent several unpleasant years being forced to use Notes. The applications that the IT staff built for it were approximately worthless. And as for Notes as an email client, the less said, the better.

However, users don't get to vote for this kind of thing. And according to some people, at least, IBM has seen the Web 2.0 light. This June, at the Enterprise 2.0 conference, for example, there was a SharePoint versus Lotus Connections shootout, and Lotus came out the victor, because of its better use of social networking.

Mike Gotta, Burton Group analyst who moderated the session, said that Connections was "the clear winner across the board," according to Network World.

In his blog, Gotta castigated Microsoft on several accounts. He seemed to hint that Microsoft arrogance may be at work:

Maybe Microsoft underestimated IBM. Maybe Microsoft feels that SharePoint is on such a roll that its weak blog and wiki offerings are not going to hurt it in the long run. I'm at a loss as to why the session was such a bust from a Microsoft perspective. There was clearly more that could have been shown but for whatever reason, IBM walked out of the room with a clear and decisive win.

If Microsoft is serious about unseating Lotus, it's going to have to do more than boast. It's going to have to beef up SharePoint's social networking capabilities, for a start. And chest-beating won't help sell a single copy of software.

What People Are Saying

Microsoft extensibility puts it ahead

We're deploying an extension of our flagship product that heavily integrates into the Microsoft Productivity Suite (Exchange, Sharepoint, Active Directory) and this flexibility is what kills IBM Connections.

The ability to extend or even develop on the product in any meaningful way is completely lacking for IBM. Microsoft heavily promotes and supports the partners that "fill in the gaps" with their product sets; Connections, seems to be a closed system with a limited set of end users.
Even at Enterprise 2.0, Microsoft promoted 9 key partners that were innovating on the Sharepoint platform, promoting the idea that anything that isn't done yet, can be.

Lotus Notes... Web 2.0 ready?

Lotus Notes is the most horrible web application I have ever had the misfortune of programming in. I would be what you would consider "IT" and have to tell you how much Notes/Domino has really made me appreciate good Software like SharePoint, Exchange Server, Outlook etc.

Lotus Notes Web

Given that Lotus Notes is not a web application, I would caution others not to take these comments too seriously. Others I know think Domino is far superior.

It's about the brand...

While I would agree that the Lotus Quikr and Connections offerings are better than the similar functionality that Microsoft offers, I would counter the that IBM's offerings do not matter at all based on the following:

1. Outlook is the defacto corporate email client - the Outlook brand has infinitely more recognition than notes.

2. Web 2.0 isn't fully baked for enterprise usage - I don't care who's name is on the box.

What this means is that CIOs are still struggling to understand, and quantify the value of social networking in the enterprise, and when they do they will inherently look to the existing collaboration stack to build upon. 9 times out of 10 that stack will be Microsoft.

I'm not insinuating that social networking does not have a place in the modern enterprise (2.0?), but I am concluding that by the time it matters Microsoft will have caught and passed any of the current Lotus offerings.

If you look throughout the history of Lotus branded software you will find that there's a pattern of Microsoft offerings superseding similar Lotus offerings for market and mind-share repeatedly; but, an element of market timing always seems to exist that enables this leap-frog effect.