Can new laptop batteries pay for themselves?
- TAGS:laptop, mobile computing, notebook
- IT TOPICS:Mobile & Wireless
SANTA BARBARA, CALIF. -- My main workhorse travel laptop is a Dell Latitude D810. Because of extremely heavy and constant use, my battery life has plummeted to under an hour. The laptop is two years old. Should I buy a new laptop, or just upgrade the batteries?
When I bought the laptop, I upgraded the battery, and also purchased a secondary bay battery (it fits in the same slot as my DVD drive) which gave me about eight hours of battery life. That was great while it lasted.
My first thought when battery life started going south was: time to buy a new laptop. But everything else about the system is in perfect working order. There haven't been amazing leaps in laptop technology in the past two years that would justify buying a new system.
Then I looked at the price of replacement batteries. On the Dell web site, the best battery for the D810, the 80 WHr 9-Cell Lithium-Ion Primary Battery, costs $165.99. A replacement bay battery costs another $129.99. With taxes and shipping the cost of these replacement batteries would come to $318.91!
At first I balked at the idea of paying so much for new batteries to power an old laptop. But then I thought: How would an economist make this decision?
First of all, Moore's Law exists, and can be applied to the price of laptops. A Laptop that costs X today will likely cost X minus some amount in, say, one year. If I were to replace this laptop in exactly one year with the exact same make, model and configuration, would the difference exceed $318.91?
That's the model. In reality, Dell doesn't even sell Latitude D810s now -- forget about one year from now. Second, I wouldn't buy another Latitude D810. I would buy some totally different laptop. Third, there's the utility argument. How much more useful, enjoyable or productive would a brand-new laptop be during this assumed year of additional use? Fourth what about the sale price? If I decided to sell my current laptop in one year, could I get more if it has good batteries? How much more?
Unknowable factors render this whole exercise unrealistic. Still, the question remains: In general, when you have a perfectly good two-year-old laptop with batteries that have degraded to uselessness, does it pay off to dump the laptop and buy a new one, or replace the batteries?
I've decided that the best way to find out is to identify a laptop that can serve as the late-2007 version of my Latitude D810 -- one likely to be around in the same configuration one year hence -- and see if its price declines by at least $318.91.
I think it will.
So I've purchased the batteries (they're charging up now), and have identified my test laptop: The Dell "Small & Medium Business" LatitudeTM D830 with "Enhanced Security, Storage & Support" with an Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 (2.00GHz) 2M L2 Cache, 800MHz Dual Core; Windows XP Professional (I don't trust Vista even for a pretend laptop); a batter upgrade -- 9 Cell Primary and 6 Cell Media Bay Batteries; memory upgrade -- 4.0GB, DDR2-667 SDRAM, 2 DIMMS; hard drive upgrade -- 160GB Hard Drive, 9.5MM, 7200RPM; and the addition of mobile broadband -- Verizon Wireless built-in mobile broadband (EV-DO Rev A).
The total: $2,166.
So my artificial test is this: If this same system configured in the same or similar way costs $1,847.09 or less on December 11, 2008, I'm going to call my decision to buy replacement batteries a good one. Check back next year.
In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy having monster battery life again. And I can still use the older batteries to extend the life of the new ones. For example, if I'm going to be using the laptop in hot or cold weather, I'll pop in the old batteries so I don't subject the new ones to these life-shortening extremes.
What do YOU think? Was this a good decision? Are expensive replacement batteries worth buying for a two-year-old laptop?




