Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Michael R. Farnum's picture
Michael R. Farnum

Hitting the Security Nerve

Child Internet Safety Task Force

I have always been leery of government passing laws about Internet safety (read here and here) because I view them as mostly posing by politicians. Also, I am of the opinion that the private sector is much better at most things than government, and Internet safety is no exception. That is why I was thrilled to read about the taskforce being spearheaded by Harvard and MySpace (and joined by other groups such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo!).

The aim of the taskforce is to protect children from online predators. Though laws can often spawn action by private organizations (examples are compliance regulations), they are woefully inadequate when it comes to protecting children online. This is for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is that criminals, by definition, break the law. But when a group of technologists get together to try to solve the problem, the game starts to change. They will be looking for proactive ways to protect children rather than punishing organizations for not enabling technology that doesn't exist yet.

A quote from the article expresses doubt at the move:

But this all comes at an odd time, as another recent study published in Pediatrics said that online predators tend to prefer methods other than social networks to get in touch with children. Instead, they like to stick to chat rooms and IM, with the authors of the study concluding, "broad claims of victimization risk, at least defined as unwanted sexual solicitation or harassment, associated with social networking sites do not seem justified."

I understand this doubt, but I also have to say that child safety modifies the risk equation because ALL avenues of attack need to be mitigated, even if the risk is low. Also, there nothing to say that the taskforce can't tackle the other problems as well.

I applaud this move. Though the problem is daunting, I can't help but have a positive attitude about this taskforce.

What People Are Saying

One only need look at the

One only need look at the random destruction of innocent families by Child Protective Services (especially Illinois DCFS and KIDS HOPE UNITED) to realize the destructiveness of government interference in parenting.

Illinois DCFS is more evil than communism or criminal street gangs or slavery and it is taking decades of work by true Americans to put an end to this vicious bureaucracy.

What has Obama said about Internet Safety?

Now that Obama is in office, what are his thoughts on internet safety, privacy etc?

Obviously the Google boy's love him so I'm assuming Obama's views are okay?

Would love to hear feedback if this conversation is still going on here.

thanks!

Children are accessing porn

Children are accessing porn sites, chatting with strangers, and posting inappropriate content on the web because parents are not doing their jobs. There is a need for a much greater awareness regarding the dangers presented online, the lack of security measures, the failed/reversed laws, etc.

Government and Family

The government should stay out of parenting issues. One only need look at the random destruction of innocent families by Child Protective Services (especially Illinois DCFS and KIDS HOPE UNITED) to realize the destructiveness of government interference in parenting.

Illinois DCFS is more evil than communism or criminal street gangs or slavery and it is taking decades of work by true Americans to put an end to this vicious bureaucracy.

Poor Parenting not Predators are to Blame

Michael,

The biggest threat facing children and teenagers on the internet today is not cyber predators but rather irresponsible parents. Children are accessing porn sites, chatting with strangers, and posting inappropriate content on the web because parents are not doing their jobs. The solution to solving the problem of minors on the internet does not involve more intense policing rather it involves holding parents criminally responsible when a child accesses porn, posts inappropriate material, or meets a predator offline.

If my child burns himself on the kitchen stove and I have to take him to the hospital, then the first thing that is going to be asked is: where were the parents when this happened? If the hospital staff doesn't feel the correct answer is given, then the matter is referred to a child welfare agency. When a child meets a predator from online in the real world and gets molested, then the parents are called a VICTIM along with the child. This is utterly insane. The parents of these kids should be arrested and charged with a criminal offense for not properly supervising the child's online behavior as well as keeping tabs of the child outside the home.

Until police begin to file criminal charges against the parents of children victimized online, then there will not be solution to this problem. Instead, responsible adults who use the internet will be punished in the name of "saving the children." I really wish that yourself and other members of the news media would start holding parents accountable for poor parenting and not blaming the big corporations for parental malfeasance.

Chuck Paugh
Portland, OR

Poor Parenting to Blame? I don't think so.

Wow, do you have any young children? How exactly do you monitor what they're
doing on the internet? I am a working mom and single parent.
My son is old enough to be home alone after school. Quite frankly, it's very difficult to
monitor his activities on the internet as he seems to get past ALL the parental
controls I've attempted to set up through the web browser.
It's unfortunate and fortunate at the same time that these kids are WAY more
computer-savvy than many of their parents. Of course I'm worried about the sites and/or chat-rooms he visits online, but I've found a way I can monitor where he goes.
There are many different software tools out there for parents, but what makes the program I use www.SendMeScreens.com different is that it is simple to set up, easy to use and promotes a dialog between parents and their children. It doesn't deny access to websites or restrict the child in any way, all it does is keep you informed of what they're doing and allows the parent to make the decision to intervene or not.
It takes pictures a couple times a minute and then the program saves them to the hard drive. I don't always have to look at them, but I like to check up on his activity once in a while. I can easily access them from the website for a nominal monthly fee. I can't describe the comfort I have knowing what he's up to -it's not all bad, either. But if something were to occur, I could reference where he's been and investigate it further.
You need to become a pro-active parent when your child is too old for a babysitter!
Cori Forsner
Dallas, TX

Internet Safety Task Force

Do children at Disneyland enter on rides in which they do not meet the child protection security requirements? (No, or they would simply slip under the security bars.) Do adult book stores allow children to wander and shop? No. Do bars let children drink alcohol? No. Do movie theaters allow young children in adult rated movies? No. In all areas of society, child protection laws are necessary to shield the innocent. . .Which INCLUDES the Internet (which is lacking greatly).

It's enlightening and frightening to research the FAILED and REVERSED bills/laws in the last 12 years pertaining to the Internet and child protection. There is a need for a much greater awareness regarding the dangers presented online, the lack of security measures, the failed/reversed laws, etc. How simple would it be to use a credit card to access pornography, MySpace, or Facebook etc., on the Internet? This would protect a larger majority of young children today that have been exposed to adult images, sexual predators, pedophiles, etc.,

MySpace has responsibilities and potential security measures that have NOT been implemented in the last 2 years. To claim that child "email verification" is a "security measure," when a child/teen can create a new email address in 2 minutes is absurd. It is hopeful that the "Task Force" will generate and eventually implement ideas that will be productive and beneficial. Hopefully the Task Force(27 businesses/non profits) will not creat a "blame game" web if action is not taken and enforced. It looks as if this move may diffuse a current focus on MySpace and spread it to others.

Any protective measures which have been installed in the home computer in an effort to keep children from predators, pedophiles and pornography have been growing obsolete with increasing technology and tech savvy teens (Sadly, years ago Kristin's brother informed that AOL filter/block did NOT work properly). There will soon be wireless online access on every cell phone, in every coffee shop, library, school campus, friend's home, etc . . .The problem has been creeping out of the parent's control, and laws are NOT keeping stride with the growing technology. Children and teens are keeping stride . . .Bypassing blocks, passwords, security software, etc.

Security measures provided by social networking sites (example:credit card requirement) will not be as easily manipulated by savvy teens as security software/passwords installed on the home computer by parents.

Pedophiles and perverts create domain names that attempt to duplicate a common domain site targeting toward children/teens typing typical spelling errors, for the purpose of exposing young people to pornography!! It pays for them financially . . .At the expense of children !!!!

PARENTS: Examine the Internet threat to your children since 1998-The reversed child protection laws, the failed bills . . .Look at the injustice and FIGHT FOR CHANGE !!!
The impact upon our children has been slow and seductive, too often resulting in DEAD LEGISLATION AND DECEASED CHILDREN.

There were LAWS that protected children in society prior to the Internet. THE INTERNET TODAY IS VOID OF THE SAME PROTECTION for our children !!

Without child protection laws in place and security measures / responsibility taken by the MySpace (the "Disneyland" of the Internet), it is NOT ENOUGH for mom to be home every day putting the children first. It is NOT ENOUGH to be loving, educate and warn of all dangers. . . Internet sexual predator dangers, expoure to pornography, and bullying. IF parental education were enough for typical teen, Kristin Helms would still be alive.

Pertinent and correct facts, the obvious and clear desire to aid other families, and a glimpse of the profound love Kristin experienced in her short 16 years of life can be found at:

Kristin Helms Internet Safety Foundation
www.kristinhelmsfoundation.org

In Loving Memory of:
Kristin Danielle Helms
June 5, 1990 - July 16, 2006

Monitoring Tools

I have to take exception with one part of your comment; although the AOL filter may not work properly there are sophisticated quality monitoring and filtering programs available that are very difficult to find or defeat.

SpectorSoft makes several products that are almost impossible to circumvent. Many adults over estimate the true computer skills of their children. Just because a child has learned a few basic tricks from the Internet does not mean they are going to outsmart a well designed monitoring tool.

I have used eBlaster from SpectorSoft to monitor our children and it can monitor, block and record activity without being found or by passed.

Internet Safety Task Force

Thank you for your interesting summary of the new task force. When I originally read the press release I had to stifle hysterical laughter. I'm sure that they have finally figured it out!!! An electronic solution! Wow! That is sure to stop those young kids from being online.... Yep .. that's right. Let's provide parents and social networks with more unusable electronic leashes. What happened to providing "parenting" instruction to these parents so that there is no reason for the kids to do anything bad without being aware of the consequences? I don't know what the task force costs but it is a band aid solution at best (and a leaky one at that). Do they really think that better electronic solutions are going to do anything at all to this generation of techno-savvy kids? You may as well try to hold your hands up to stop a tsunami. Within a few minutes of instituting any electronic barriers, the kids will have a “work-around” posted on their MySpace page and on a variety of websites that already have work-arounds for other electronic “solutions.” Perhaps parents would be better served to read my book: “Me, MySpace, and I: Parenting the Net Generation” for information on “real” solutions that involve no electronic barriers. More information about my work can be found at http://www.Me-MySpace-and-I.com

I understand the sentiment

Dr. Rosen,

Thank you for posting your opinion on this matter. I wholeheartedly agree that parents should be the first line of defense. Actually, I kick myself a little since I thought of that same thing a few times while I was writing the post and somehow still forgot to include it.

However, the point of my post is that technologists attacking this problem give much more hope than some laws that contain nothing but words. I hardly think you can disagree with that. And though parents should definitely parent, there is nothing wrong with giving them tools to help out.

Nice plug, BTW. I hope you have continued success.

Michael R. Farnum

Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions than ruined by too confident a security.
Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)