Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Chrome on Linux: Rough, fast & promising

I'd been waiting for Chrome on Linux since Chrome first showed up. Chrome, if you haven't tried it, is the speed-demon of Web browsers. I love it. But, until now, there really wasn't a version that would run natively on Linux. Starting last night, June 4th, Google released developer's versions of Chrome for Macs and Linux. They're rough, really rough, but they're also really fast. Here's what I found in my first hours of working with Chrome on Linux.

I downloaded the developer release 3.0.183.1 on two different Linux systems. One was running MEPIS 8 and the other had Ubuntu 9.04. Both are Debian-based Linux distributions, and I chose them for that since Chrome is currently only available in 32 and 64-bit versions in the DEB format. You can install DEB packages in Linux distributions that use RPM program packaging systems, but I didn't want to introduce any more variables than possible in looking at alpha software.

In the event, while Chrome installed without a hitch in both, on MEPIS, it wasn't able to connect with any network services, so I dropped looking at it on that Linux for now. On my Ubuntu 9.04 PC it was a different story. On this Gateway 503GR with a 3GHz Pentium IV CPU, 2GB of RAM, an ATI Radeon 250 graphics card, and a 300GB SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) hard drive, Chrome ran with blazing speed.

It also, I should say, ran remarkably badly. It's been years since I've seen normal CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) and HTML pages render quite so horribly. Columns wouldn't line up and there were visual artifacts from the top of every page to the bottom.

But, as Google Chrome developers, Mike Smith and Karen Grunberg, said in their Chromium blog, about the Mac and Linux releases: "please DON'T DOWNLOAD THEM! Unless of course you are a developer or take great pleasure in incomplete, unpredictable, and potentially crashing software."

Well, Chrome on Ubuntu hasn't crashed on me, but it sure has done everything else wrong that it could. Except, that is, run slowly.

So, in brief, here's what doesn't work on this alpha version of Chrome: plug-ins; media-players like Flash; printing; security settings; Firefox bookmark importing, and a host of other problems. For the full, at the moment, list you can visit the Chromium issues page.

The developers are quite right. This is no browser for anyone except Chromium, Chrome's open-source project, developers or people who want to play with the fastest new toys. There is no way anyone could use Chrome on Linux as an ordinary browser.

That said, I love it. I feel like a 16-year old with a broken down car that can do 0-to-70-MPH (miles per hour) in less than 7 seconds. It may be junk, but boy, it's fast junk.

How fast? On the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark, the Chrome alpha came in at 1227.4ms (milliseconds). On the same system, Firefox 3.0.10 came in at 5564.8ms. Need I say more?

So use Chrome on Linux now? No, forget about it. But, you can bet I'm looking forward to using it on a daily basis on my Linux systems when it goes fina--whenever that will be! Google, as usual, isn't talking. Come that day, Firefox 3.5, which was recently delayed, will be in for some real competition.

What People Are Saying

Having discovered Ad Block

Having discovered Ad Block plus at the beginning of the year I don't care how good a browser is, if it doesn't support it I won't use it.

It is a shock to use a machine without it, you forget how much extraneous advertising crap there is on websites, with it there is the bliss of white space.

Can't ever see a time whilst it is around I won't have it installed.

Good news

Really good news to know Chromium is getting in a runnable state. Although not ready yet, for me it's running pretty well and just like you said really fast. Never saw a browser faster than this one. I put post on my blog about it: http://www.politreco.com/2009/06/chromium/

Importing FF bookmarks

I'm running Chromium "3.0.184.0 (0)" on Ubuntu 9.04 (32-bit) installed via Update Manager from http://ppa.launchpad.net/chromium-daily/ppa/ubuntu

I was able to import my Firefox bookmarks, but the process was hinky. IIRC, the trick was that FF could not be running when I did the import. Further, deleting Chromium bookmarks, in order to import updated FF bookmarks, required me to shutdown Chromium, find the bookmarks, delete the file, start Chromium, and re-import. Kludgy, but it worked.

I love the Chromium Alpha. Yes, there is a lot left to be done, but I find it to be fast and amazingly stable. I use it for much of my browsing, but copy some URLs to FF, as required.

It certainly is one of the better Alphas I've used. I'm willing to ignore ads, for now.

Running well on Fedora

I downloaded a build last night and have it running on Fedora 10 just fine. I haven't noticed any CSS issues, and it certainly is blazing fast. Posting this comment using it actually. Can't wait for the finished product.

Wow it is speedy..

I used a 9.04 32bit virtual machine on a AMD5000+ Dual and got 822.6ms +/- 1.8% with Chrome. BTW Opera 10 Alpha1.gcc4.qt4 got 6514.4ms +/- 1.2%..

Where is Opera 10 Alpha!?

This article could at least be thorough and also included Opera 10 Alpha1 or the current 9.64 in its speed comparison!

CSS works fine but on computerworld.com

I've just installed Chrome on an Alpha version of Ubuntu 9.10 (I think we're still in Alpha one).

It's working perfect on all my favorite sites. Then when I came back to this entry (via iGoogle) I found some CSS issue. ^_^.

So IMHO it's a very good beginning! And who needs flash ;).

Ludovic
--Using Chrome on Ubuntu

Maybe it's a feature

built in ad blocker

No rendering problems for me

I'm also using Ubuntu 9.04 but I've got the Chromium 184 build. Pages render normally for me, of course it might depend on which sites one visits.

I added the Chromium repository and get regular updates.

And yes, it's very fast. I just wonder however if it's going to slow down as features are added? Startup time is unbelievably fast. Only Midori starts as fast as Chromium. It's probably got just as many features too...

But does Chrome block ads?

I don't care if Chrome starts fast. I _am_ interested to know if I can install Adblock Plus on it to remove those horribly distracting moving adverts that Computerworld and too many other websites are foisting on us these days.

I'd far sooner have a slower-starting Firefox with no ads, thanks.