Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Comcast's broadband pickle

Comcast announced this week its intention to issue a stock dividend and to buy back $7 billion of its stock to keep the price up. The move calls into question its strategy for future rollouts and upgrades of broadband services.

Growth companies don't issue dividends or make stock buybacks, since that money can be invested in opportunities that eventually lead to a higher return. Comcast's $7 billion payout is an acknowledgement that the company is utility than innovative growth stock.

The buyback represents a major exit of capital from the business that could otherwise be applied to growth of Comcast's key operations - such as a high speed broadband infrastructure or an expansion of existing services into the half of the country that has no broadband at all.

According to this Wall Street Journal story, "Cable investors have complained about expensive upgrades sapping free cash flow..." To boost that and salve investors' irritation, Comcast is cutting back on capital expenses as a percent of total revenue. It's apparent that the financial benefits of broadband infrastructure build-out do not accrue fast enough to meet the expectations of investors.

Comcast is feeling the pressure. Its traditional business is shrinking. It lost 94,000 cable subscribers last year. It did gain 331,000 new high-speed Internet customers in 2007, but the rate of growth has been declining, slowing by about one third over the previous year. That's probably one reason why investors aren't so hot on seeing more money poured into broadband infrastructure capital projects. Comcast continues to mine revenues from its existing broadband infrastructure by stealing away teleco customers with its digital telephone services, but the company does not appear to be interested in pushing basic broadband infrastructure deeper into rural areas, and efforts to provide higher speed Internet services in metro areas aren't exactly surging ahead.

As I wrote last time (see Trouble in FiOS land), the only other serious competitor for broadband services - the telephone companies, lead by Verizon and AT&T - face the same market forces that are pushing communications companies to slow - or even divest - infrastructure efforts in some areas.

Comcast's financial moves represent a continuing flight of capital from the broadband markets and puts another dent in the argument that markets alone will create the kind of broadband infrustructure that's vital to the United State's long-term prosperity.

What People Are Saying

High Speed Internet dsl cable broadband providers

Logon to DealsBroadband.com.
We provide a wide range of the different types of high speed Cable,DSL,Internet on the market today, and their relative strengths and weaknesses for different types of users. Most importantly, various offers and Best Deals of Broadband are just a mouse click away.

Of course, the fact that the

Of course, the fact that the FCC has ruled that Comcast cannot expand any further at this point couldn't have anything to do with them not being able to expand their coverage area, could it?

If I were Comcast, I wouldn't put another penny in to an infrastructure that they apparently don't have the right to control anyway. (see recent p2p throttling news).

Not sure I follow

I'm not sure I follow here. As far as I know, the FCC's investigation of Comcast's P2P throttling practices does not block Comcast from continuing to build out its network, nor does it prevent the cable company from upgrading it to faster speeds.

You are correct, their

You are correct, their investigation in to p2p is not preventing them from doing anything.

Maybe a google search for "FCC cable ownership 30%" would help clarify the issue for you.

"The Federal Communications Commission is finally publishing the rule it approved in December limiting cable system operators’ reach to no more than 30% of the nation’s cable households"

They, Comcast, are already sitting at near 28%.

As far as increasing their bandwidth goes, they do increase their bandwidth, nonstop. The problem is, p2p is a busted protocol, specifically designed to "steal bandwidth" from the ISP. No matter how much bandwidth you throw at it, p2p just takes it. With no way to block/stop that, it doesn't make a difference how much bandwidth they deploy. As a company, if it doesn't make a difference how much bandwidth they throw at the problem, they aren't going to throw more bandwidth at it just to make copyright thieves happy.

The only option ISP's will have left is to go to a per bit pay model. How many of these P2P advocates will allow people to download from
them when it costs them 40 bucks per meg? People want the price of a best effort service but they want dedicated bandwidth for that price. Apparently they aren't aware that a 1.5 meg T1 is averaging about 500.00 a month right now.