Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Dear Microsoft, thanks for the help, Linux

You gotta love it. Microsoft has decided that it will ho ahead and kill off easy access to XP on June 30th. On behalf of desktop Linux users everywhere, and our first cousins, the Mac fans, thanks. You've given us the best shot we'll ever have of taking the desktop.

But it gets even better! Microsoft has also announced that it will be releasing Windows 7 on January 2010. They'll blow that ship date. Microsoft has never set a shipping date it could meet. But, who in their right mind would now buy Vista?

I mean, come on, I don't think anyone with their wits about them would buy Vista anyway. Vista is to operating systems what the 1976 Tampa Bay Buccaneers are to the National Football League, the worse of all time. Vista was trash; Vista is trash; and now Microsoft, as expected, is throwing Vista on the trash dump.

It also helps that Microsoft has decided to go ahead and dump XP, the operating system its customers want, no matter how loudly they say they want to keep buying XP. Now that's showing your customers how much you really care about what they want.

Desktop Linux is poised to make the most of this opportunity to convince Windows users that there is a better way. For starters, desktop Linux doesn't lock you into a single vendor. This is also where desktop Linux beats Apple all hollow. Whereas Microsoft has just shown you that they don't care what you want, with desktop Linux you will always be able to use the version of the operating system you want to use. Absolutely love Red Hat 9, the last consumer version of Red Hat Linux from 2003? You can still download a fresh copy of it from Red Hat. I'm not sure why you would, but you can, and I know some people who are still using it on servers to this day.

The desktop Linuxes also are now available from top OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) such as Dell, Lenovo, and Asus. You don't need to install anything. You just buy it, turn it on, and use it.

Oh, and all those horrid stories about hard Linux is to use? They never had much truth in them to begin with and anyone who can use XP can run modern Linux distributions like Ubuntu 8.04, Fedora 9, and openSUSE 11. For that matter, with distributions like Xandros, which you'll find on the popular Asus Eee line of inexpensive computers, any one who has ever used Windows may be hard put to tell they're not running Windows Finally, there are distributions like gOS, that any reasonably bright elementary school student can use.

Applications? You can't live without your favorite Windows application and the mere thought of virtualization to get them gives you hives or switching to OpenOffice from Microsoft Office makes you sick to the tummy? The 15-years in the making WINE 1.0 project just came out, and with it you can run Microsoft Office, Adobe Photoshop, Quicken, and many other program like, ahem, Guild Wars my Windows-based online game of choice, on Linux. WINE, and its commercial big-brother, CodeWeavers' Crossover Linux, lets me run pretty much any Windows application I want on Linux without any hassles.

Add it all up and what do you get? Well, what I get is Microsoft telling its desktop customers to jump in the lake, until 2010 anyway and that gives you lots of time to give desktop Linux a try. I don't think, I know, you'll be very pleased at what you find. Thanks Microsoft, we couldn't have done it without you.

RSS feed icon Like this stuff? Subscribe to the RSS feed.

-----------------

Related Items

What People Are Saying

Apple is not free software

The real concern for anyone switching to using a free operating system, is whether they are doing so out of purely financial reasons (ie. Vista is too expensive, Vista requires me to buy a new computer) or because of ethics.

Free software is software that respects our freedom. To use free software is to make a political and ethical choice asserting our rights to learn and to share what we learn with others.

Encouraging people to switch to using a free operating system, whilst using proprietary software will only continue to leave users divided and helpless -- divided because they are forbidden to share copies with anyone else and helpless because they don't have the source code that programmers can read and change.

To refer to the Mac as the 'first cousin' of the free software movement is the wrong analogy. Apple built Mac OS X on a lie -- they managed to convince people that their approach was 'free enough' -- that having a mixture of BSD and GNU code despite all the other proprietary software shipped with OS X is enough.

Apple borrows and builds its foundations on the work of the free software movement, picking and choosing when it needs to, and yet still keeps users in the dark. Apple tries to position themselves as an alternative operating system, but fundamentally they are the same as Microsoft.

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html is a great description of what free software is and http://www.fsf.org/resources/what-is-fs is a useful explanation of the ethics involved.

Re: Apple is not free software

Spot on Matt.

A quote that I like (I'm not sure who originally said it) is:

"The point was never Unix on the desktop, but a free desktop"

Apple has done the first, using FreeBSD code, but has missed completely (and deliberately) on the second.

MS/Linux

My comment is from my personal experience dual-booting XP and Ubuntu, not sweeping, global industry-wide stuff.

Linux has been 100 percent reliable-- I have to tweak XP all the time, updating, running virus scans, disk clean up, virus scans, etc., and at random times it gives me an error, or fails to shut down, in spite of shutdown fixes. Overall it has been workable, and has lots of available gaming software to choose from.

Linux is faster, uses fewer resources, and shuts down properly every time. It drags and drops like XP. However, it does not have much good gaming software and didn't have drivers for my new HP 1018 laser printer or my HP5200C scanner, and I wasted some time on that before I substituted an EBay Epson 3170 Photo scanner and plugged in my old HP 5P laser printer. Now it works great. If Linux could just get more packaged drivers from these proprietary printer/scanner companies...

Way to go

I am being censored on this board. I imagine for raising doubts about linux viability. I guess once you start bringing up valid points you're not allowed to speak up and disrupt "Linux is god" chant.

Microsoft's version vs. a Hacker version

Ironically enough, while Vista is now infamous for its sluggish, hardware-staining traits, another Windows OS also based on the Server 2003 codeset (which Vista is alleged to be) is anything but -- just Google: "Windows Tiny2003 eXPerience." Someone took Server 2003, stripped it of all its fluff and added back some nice Microsoft alternatives like a Sygate firewall, Firefox and such to produce a lean, mean, gaming oriented Windows OS. I tried it on an older, discarded Athlon-based PC and I was shocked at how much faster it was than XP.

There isn't a single good reason in the world that Microsoft can't do something similar to salvage Vista (call it Vista X-Treme or such) -- aside from maybe not having the programming talent and wherewithal, that is....

Interesting...

A few days back I posted this comment:

'Anything that casts Linux in a positive light will be shot down in flames here.

Those that have already commented on this article have made it abundantly clear how afraid they (and Microsoft) are of Linux gaining momentum.

Why bother with this article in the first place, page hits?'

I then got this reply from someone calling themeslves Mike:

'I'm not sure what you're smoking but take a look at which comments get the +110 and which get the -438. This site is very much a pro-Linux/anti-Microsoft site.'

And you know what, I think Mike is right about the pro-Linux slant about the comments made.

Having read through a few days accumulated responses to the article I may have been in error. Clearly many more use Linux and comment on blogs.computerworld.com than I initially thought. Kudos to you all.

But what I was correct about judging from other posters is the revulsion many Microsoft users feel towards Linux.

I still maintain this is because fear of the unknown or something different is human nature. But I also realise many have an agenda that needs the Microsoft leviathan to continue. Their job security and monetary income depend on it.

So on one issue I stand corrected. Unfortunately on the other issue my viewpoint has been reinforced by many orders of magnitude.

Explain how their job

Explain how their job security and monetary income depend on Microsoft. Thank you.

I still maintain this is

I still maintain this is because fear of the unknown or something different

So if i don't eat strawberry icecream that's because of fear and there is no other explanation? Man you are showing very sound reasoning here.

'So if i don't eat

'So if i don't eat strawberry icecream that's because of fear and there is no other explanation? Man you are showing very sound reasoning here.'

Well Mr. Pink, you pick fault in one sentence out of an entire comment. Is this because you cannot find fault with the comment as a whole?

Your posting history points to your own bias against Linux and FOSS in general. I suspect you are one of the very people I spoke about in my comment in the first place.

Most of your own comments could have come straight out of the Redmond behemoth's own PR department. Have you nothing of your own?

I know of many such as you. Those that cut their teeth on Microsoft products. The MSCE that can point, click and drool but nothing else.

And as for my reasoning, I was rather stating the obvious.

You realy should try that strawberry icecream, assuming you can get permission from Microsoft of coarse.

I wish someone would make

I wish someone would make all these technology pundits sit down and actually program an OS just so they could really provide something more than repeating the same old Linux community line of "Vista is Trash" or "MS cannot hit a release date". I think its so funny how you give someone a article and they are all of a sudden "the" expert. I hope the readers know more than to believe or put any creedance into what guys like this author say. They are a irreprehensible bunch of posers who typically would not know a bite from a byte. All they really care about is syndication and will write anything to get hits. What a joke.