Defending AT&T's $200 iPhone 3GS upgrade pricing
- TAGS:AT&T, iPhone 3GS, priing, upgrade
- IT TOPICS:Macintosh & Apple, Mobile & Wireless
Let's get one thing straight before I defend AT&T. I think their service is poor and their voice plans are over-priced. Their telephone support is awful as well.
That being said, all of this pooh poohing about the iPhone 3GS upgrade pricing is just silly. AT&T is charging those who've had their contract less than a year (most iPhone 3G users) a $200 fee for upgrading to the new 3GS. That is on top of the iPhone 3GS's $199-$299 price tag.
The iPhone is a subsidy sale. AT&T's prices reflect the costs they have to pay Apple every month to sell the iPhone.
AT&T's price on an iPhone is probably close to $600 (Retail is $700-800, AT&T probably gets $100 off in bulk). Apple sells it to you for $200 and foots AT&T with the bill for the rest. That $400 is broken out over 24 months that you're obligated to pay for your iPhone. Without getting too fancy with interest and amortization tables, that's around $200/year of your bill going toward the purchase price of the iPhone. This is part of the contract you agree to when you buy an iPhone.
The problem is that if you stop paying and want a "restart" with a newer, more expensive iPhone and plan just like some guy switching over from Verizon, AT&T is out for those months you aren't paying for the previous iPhone. That is a couple of hundred bucks that AT&T already has in their books for you that you want to walk out of.
The $200 is a fair fee.
AT&T isn't totally free and clear on blame for this outrage, however. They could break out the monthly cost of the initial iPhone purchase on monthly bills and even let the customer know how much of their iPhone was paid off every month, just like mortgage companies provide to homeowners.
Apple isn't 100% innocent either. A 16GB iPod Touch costs $299. How does the extra phone and camera hardware double the price of the device? In reality, they can charge whatever they want for the device ... but, by that logic, so can AT&T.
Whic hbrings us back to the bill. AT&T have many other incidental charges broken out. Why not put the cost of the iPhone on there so the customer knows how much of the bill is going to Apple?
The reason why they won't put that on the bill is simple. They want you to continue to pay the higher monthly fee once you are done paying off your phone. The mobile companies make too much off of people who continue to "pay off" their phones long after the contract has run out.
As for that $200? That is the only thing fair about AT&T's iPhone plan.



