Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Michael Horowitz's picture
Michael Horowitz

Defensive Computing

Defensively installing a VoIP telephone adapter

Recently, fellow Computerworld blogger Robert L. Mitchell has been writing about about Vonage and Ooma, two independent VoIP (Voice over IP) providers. As a relatively new Vonage customer I carefully read the account of his problems and subsequent debugging.

Mitchell added the Vonage telephone adapter (V-Portal) to his network exactly the way Vonage instructs.

I would never do that.

Assuming your broadband modem and router are two separate boxes (rather than a single integrated unit), Vonage instructs you to install their box between the modem and the router. No doubt they do this to insure the best VoIP performance. It also makes their tech support easier, the V-Portal is only dependent on the broadband modem. Any problems with the router aren't their problem.

From a Defensive Computing perspective, however, this is a mistake.

All the computers on a Local Area Network (LAN) have to depend on the modem and router; there's no way around this. But, do you really want every computer on your network to also depend on the telephone adapter? Do you want a problem with the V-Portal to knock the entire network off-line? I don't.

Mitchell disagrees, writing

... placing the V-Portal behind the router limited the unit's ability to give preference to voice traffic as opposed to, say, my daughter's viewing of YouTube videos. That can affect call quality. The best choice, therefore, is to put the V-Portal first in line behind the cable modem ....

We have different priorities. I can not risk all the computers on my network being affected by a VoIP related problem. To me, the computers are more important than a single phone line.  

And, while having the VoIP box behind the router (that is, having a setup of broadband modem -> router -> VoIP telephone adapter) does not let the Vonage box give preference to voice traffic, you can accomplish the same thing by having the router give preference to VoIP traffic.

In fact, using a router for prioritizing things gives you much more flexibility. You might, for instance, set VoIP to the highest priority, computers used by adults to a medium priority and computers used by children to a lower priority.
 
This is not to pick on Vonage at all. Previously, I used a competing VoIP service from AT&T called CallVantage where the situation was exactly the same; AT&T also wanted their telephone adapter directly connected to the broadband modem.

More on prioritizing data traffic, officially known as Quality of Service, next time.

What People Are Saying

Hooray for Independant Thought!

Thank you for this article and thank you in advance for the QoS article you've promised.

Too many Tech Support calls include "reset all your Security to default" - whether that be Internet Explorer Security or resetting your Broadband Router to Factory Default.

As Information Technology Professionals, hopefully most of those reading this know what a bad idea that is. The first allows any web site to do anything it wants to your computer. The second breaks connectivity on any PCs which know the security codes and allows your neighbors to use your wireless internet connection.

Another common problem is Help Desk Technicians following a script and tell you do do things you've already told them you've done.

What we need is more Independant Thought like you've described here. Too bad most Help-Desk Technicians are never taught enough to effectively think for themselves. Too bad many people are never even taught HOW to do so.

I look forward to reading your next article.

I don't disagree with (sic)

I don't disagree with (sic) "Independant Thought," and I wouldn't necessarily be thrilled with a tech support geek reading from any script (although that method idiot-proofs it for the customer as well as for the geek), but I certainly would have credibility issues with any IT nerd who not only can't spell, but apparently can't, won't or doesn't know how to use spell-check.

???

Sorry - Independent Thought. Thanks for pointing out my error.

But where, exactly, is the Spell-Check Feature in the ComputerWorld Blogs Comments Section?

Although, if that's all you can find to harass me about, I guess that's not too bad.

BTW: I FREQUENTLY find spelling errors in Technical Manuals and even textbooks.

And what about the credibility of someone who posts as "Anonymous" ?

! ! !

Thanks for so graciously acknowledging your faux pas.

I'm not IT but if I need to tell you that you can paste your reply into Word and spell check it there, then my statement on credibility speaks for itself.

I point out you spelled a simple English word incorrectly and I'm "harassing" you? I suggest you look up "harass."

Your finding errors in the other places is irrelevant to your error; it doesn't correct your misspelling...unless you're suggesting frequent misspellings justify yours too.

I only pointed out your ADMITTED misspelling; one needn't be identified, Scott, to do that with full credibility. So, posting anonymously in my case has nothing to do with my credibility, but it does reflect poorly on your grasp of basic logic and protocol.