Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Digital broadcast TV is better than cable

I don't know what your cable TV bill is, but my last one was $90 for hi-def digital stations and "expanded cable," which didn't include HBO. That's way too much. I could have downgraded and killed some of cable’s digital channels services, but why settle for less?

Instead, I attached a Terk HDTV amplified, indoor antenna that I paid about $60 for and now get hi-def channels from all the major network affiliates, including Fox and PBS, in Washington DC, where I live. And thanks to digital, my local stations also broadcast standard-definition channels along with the hi-def channel.

A television station has 19.3 MBS total capability per channel. There is no consensus among broadcasters on the ideal bandwidth for hi-def. Some broadcasters believe 10 to 12 MBS is enough; others say as much as 16 MBS may be needed, according to Lynn Claudy, senior vice president of science and technology at the National Association of Broadcasters in Washington.

What this means is that broadcasters have additional capacity to deliver standard-definition channels, with each standard channel using between 2 to 3 MBS and potentially less.

The local NBC affiliate has a high-definition channel, and two standard definition channels, one for weather and another sports. The ABC broadcaster, in addition to its high-definition channel, also has continuous weather on one channel and has another dedicated to TV shows from the 1960s through 1980s.

The PBS affiliate in this area may be the most aggressive with four digital channels: one hi-def and three standard definition channels. It's clearly ready for the Feb. 17 switch to digital.

These broadcasters are still experimenting and the programming on the standard-definition channels has a work-in-progress quality about it, but viewers may easily discover that digital television will deliver anywhere from three to five times the number of analog channels.

What's the reception quality? Unless there's a helicopter flying over my apartment, the digital hi-def broadcast are, in my view, better than cable. More vibrant. I can't explain why. Your mileage may vary.

Approximately 20 million households today rely on over-the-air broadcasting for television. Another 15 million households use an antenna on some TVs, according to the broadcasters association. I doubt that this number is going to decline in this economic downturn and once people check out digital television, I wouldn’t be surprised if the number of people who rely on antennas goes up.

 

What People Are Saying

Better picture quality / good cable alternatives

We recently canceled cable TV and bought a Zenith DTT900 converter box. Our picture quality is much better than our old expensive digital cable package.

After a little research, we learned some easy ways to legally watch our favorite cable programs (even the HBO and Showtime ones) without subscribing to cable TV service. We use a combination of Hulu.com and Netflix ($9/month+) to watch favorites like (Daily Show, Entourage, etc.).

My husband (a cgi programmer) just wrote a Showfinder tool which we use to find our favorite shows.

We are blogging about our experiences with free digital tv and have just posted the 'showfinder' tool on our blog at CancelCable.com

Best of luck!

Digital TV less reliable than cable

Unfortunately, when it rains, digital over-the-air television goes away. Where analog tv used to produce random white pixels (nicknamed "snow"), digital tv will simply report that the signal is no longer present. You don't hear audio either. This is of major concern during emergencies, when cable may go out, and people sheltering in place (at home) are used to turning to their local tv stations with a battery-powered television. There are no battery-powered digital tvs, and rain eliminates the signal. Radio will be the new information source during emergencies.

(BTW, the organization of broadcasters is the NAB, National Association of Broadcasters, not the NBA, an abbreviation which is already spoken for.)

Good points

Thanks for the response.

I've noticed the rain problem as well; even cloud cover can hurt signal. But I haven't suffered complete loss of signal, mostly short periods lasting a few seconds of choppy, pixelated picture and no sound. It has varied by channel.

Regarding portables: Not many options here. There's certainly demand.

Nothing wrong with radio. Sony still produces, for about $10 retail, a portable, ICF-S10MK2, that can work for about 40 hours on two double AAs.

But there's more than radio. The DC local government uses text messaging to get out warnings and alerts. It's very effective. These services can also be customized to neighborhood, zip code.

And looking forward to WiMax.

(And thank you for pointing out the NBA ...)

Broadcast DTV

I get Broadcast DTV, via a Zenith-LG converter box, and appreciate the extra channels.

PBS in the Minneapolis Minnesota area has seven channels. The commercial stations also have numerous additional channels.

The problem with Broadcast DTV is that it does poorly when the signal is weak. The audio starts, and stops, and starts, and stops, and starts, and stops --- very annoying.

That said, almost all of the channels come in perfectly.

I bought a DigitalStream

I bought a DigitalStream converter box last year from Radio Shack, well in advance of the transition.
My reception has been much better using just rabbit ears.

But as others have said, it is more of an all or nothing thing with DTV.

I am in the Indianapolis TV market and I am buying a house soon that is about 10 more miles away from the city than I am now.
I simply plan to buy a compact outdoor antenna.

With a good antenna, I think we will find DTV to be much better than cable in many ways.

I just hope that many things that are moving to cable will start to come back to broadcast, especially local sports.