IT Blogwatch's picture
IT Blogwatch

A Daily Digest of IT Blogs from Richi Jennings

Downgrade to XP is $60: Microsoft sued

In Monday's IT Blogwatch, Richi Jennings watches Microsoft get sued over a fee to downgrade from Vista to XP. Not to mention a special Valentine's Day gift...

Gregg Keizer reports:

Windows XP box (source: Microsoft)A California woman has sued Microsoft Corp. over the $59.25 fee she was charged to "downgrade" Windows Vista on a new laptop to the older Windows XP, federal court documents show ... Microsoft's latest legal problem related to Windows Vista, which has faced scrutiny for nearly two years in the better-known "Vista Capable" case.

Los Angeles resident Emma Alvarado charged Microsoft with multiple violations of Washington state's unfair business practices and consumer protection laws over its policy of barring computer makers from continuing to offer XP on new PCs after Vista's early-2007 launch. Alvarado is seeking compensatory damages and wants the case declared a class-action suit.more


Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols adds:

Emma Alvarado is mad as heck and she's not going to take it anymore ... Most people would have just complained about it and moved on. Not Alvarado.
...
Aware that many Windows users are ready to skip Vista entirely for Windows 7, Microsoft is insisting that business customers should 'upgrade' from XP to Vista instead of waiting for Windows 7. Yeah. Right. Tell that to Alvarado and the hundreds of thousands of other users who have been forced to pay out hard won cash for XP. I'm sure their lawyers would love to hear how moving 'up' to Vista was what they wanted.more


Michael Santo asks the pertinent question:

The lawsuit also claims, without citing a source, that "to date, nearly one in three consumers purchasing a new computer has paid to downgrade the operating system from Vista to Windows XP."

Thing is, who's setting the price, and who's getting the money?more


flyingfsck gives... this:

The issue is that in order to buy XP, people were forced to buy Vista as well. That practice is called Tied Selling and it is illegal in many states.more


Eric Baird elaborates:

Yep, MS could get into trouble for market abuse for their current inconsistencies over who is "allowed" XP and who isn't. If they'd simply pulled the plug on XP totally, and said, "that's it, we aren't going to sell XP any more, because it's old and we don't want to be lumbered with the after-sales support forever", then that might be a legitimate manufacturer's decision.
...
The question is, how much control should a dominant component manufacturer have over how their products are used?more


But David Diskin wears his happy face:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't these users opt to downgrade knowing there would be an additional charge?

Not to mention that the charge is from Dell or HP or whatever OEM, and not Microsoft, but the customer opted for it.more


Falstius wonders if it's worse than Alvarado thinks:

In order to purchase the XP 'downgrade', you also had to purchase Vista Business. So the actual cost over Vista Home was closer to $150 dollars.more


Meanwhile, Mr. Conrad joshes:

The suit has been canceled after Emma Alvarado was abducted by a mysterious, well-organized, group of mosquitoes. When asked for a comment on the strange occurrence, Bill Gates is said to have laughed awkwardly while pressing his fingertips together. More on this as it develops.more


And finally...

Previously in IT Blogwatch:

Buffer overflow:

Other Computerworld bloggers:

RSS feed icon Like this stuff? Subscribe to the RSS feed.

Richi Jennings is an independent analyst/adviser/consultant, specializing in blogging, email, and spam. A 23 year, cross-functional IT veteran, he is also an analyst at Ferris Research. You can follow him on Twitter, pretend to be Richi's friend on Facebook, or just use boring old email: blogwatch@richi.co.uk.