Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

European Union to Microsoft: Drop dead

Microsoft has been increasingly playing nice with the Open Source community, but the European Union is not impressed. Recently, the European Union’s competition commissioner made it abundantly clear that she believes that European businesses and governments should abandon Microsoft en masse and head to Open Source instead.

The European Union’s competition commissioner, Neelie Kroes, pulled no punches in a recent speech. According to the New York Times, she said:

"I know a smart business decision when I see one -- choosing open standards is a very smart business decision indeed. No citizen or company should be forced or encouraged to choose a closed technology over an open one."

She didn't stop there, though, according to the Times. She said that if government use a single software supplier --- obviously referring to Microsoft --- they face serious security concerns. And she heaped praise on the City of Munich, the German Foreign Ministry and the Gendarmerie Nationale department of the French police for using open standards.

Kroes has tangled with Microsoft before, and come out the winner. She fined it almost $1.7 billion euros --- $2.7 billion --- for what she termed as violations of European rules of business competition.

No matter what Microsoft does, it's most likely not going to get a fair shake from Kroes. Microsoft, in fact, has been increasingly cooperating with the Open Source community, most recently co-sponsoring a census of Open Source use in the corporate world.

Expect to see more of that cooperation. If Microsoft is going to thrive, it needs to embrace Open Source. It just shouldn't expect that the European Union will believe it any time soon.

Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed!

What People Are Saying

American vs European

So, anyone that has a better product than you has a monoply? Or is it only successfull companies? Why not sue all companies that make over a billion dollar? BTW, do all the consumers share in this pot? Let get Ubisoft ,Toyota and Mercedes next!

american v. european and microsoft

Well you have part of it right - monopoly - but you can't say that it's a "better product". MS is into everything, each time they issue a product it's always "good enough" to issue but it's never good enough to hold up to usage. There are bugs and bugs and more bugs, the most troublesome parts are the security issues and then there's the tracking issues. Government agencies should not use MS. THINK - one private company that has it's paw, literally, in everyone's business - it's a bad movie in real life.

Microsoft & EU

Three (and a half or four) cheers for the Europeans.

Bill & his behemoth have raised the bar enormously for useability and standarization of office-type functions (good for the average user) - but regressed about 20+ years of under-the-hood sophistication (ref. z/OS) in enterprise computing that has seriously impaired security and privacy.

It is time for some flexibility and evolution in operating systems - and even competition for UNIX/Linux which (both) seem wed to 60's-era conventions.

No government (or company) concerned for security should be allowing Microsoft into their operations.

Perhaps the EU should Open Source their competition commission

Neelie Kroes could then make all her recommendations and contributions without compensation for her efforts--for the good of the community.

Those that want to register a complaint (whether a consumer, organization/corporation, or competitor), rather than submitting it to a single body, can then submit it to an open forum for comment. If the topic happens to be of current popular interest or otherwise attracts attention, it may be considered. However, if the gatekeepers (Kroes et al) deem the topic not worthy of their consideration or simply not the direction they want to take their commission, too bad for those registering complaints. They'll be ridiculed and sent away with the admonition to RTFM.

Enough is Enough

This is like the left vs right or ford vs chevy debate. There are those of us in the IT community that hates Microsoft no matter what they do. Just their very existence is all it takes.

Now, let's be real. Yes, Microsoft does things that irk people, but they have contributed to computing as a whole. I don't hear people villifying Intel over their business practices againts AMD.

What the open source community has done is a end run on Microsoft by going to a sympathetic body (the EU) to force changes that are in the Open Source communities best interest. Now some of these various companies used to be Microsoft competitors a few years ago. Remember the IDE market (SUN, Oracle, Borland, IBM, etc) all had their own closed source Java IDE and then there was Microsoft with Visual Studio. Now they all have embraced Eclipse (some with reservations) and who really has benefited. Without deep analysis I say the developer.

Let the market innovate by putting out better products for us to use. OK, there is another factor we are missing is that money is also involved here. Open Source software spreads the cost among some paid and non-paid developers. Then the company gets to promote the product. Well, Microsoft pays its employees to create the work without taking advantage of the community.

Something to think about is that the majority of software innovation or companies are American (exceptions like Linux, TrendMicro, SAP, Rails, etc do exist). Do you think that just pisses off some europeans that they aren't on top? Especially Frenchies :-)

It's funny to see people whine for Micro$atan...

Microsoft's business philosophy has always been to use every unethical and illegal method it can. When they can't succeed by kicking your teeth out, then they want to whine, "Oh poor little us, nobody likes us, waa, waa, waa. I am glad to see Micro$atan being handed their head. And they are not like Intel. At least Intel's products are good. This monopolistic, abusive, and unethical behemoth needs to fall.

Microsoft can't be trusted, period.

Has Microsoft EVER kept its word on promises of openness or interoperability. No.

Microsoft is a serial offender, and the EU recognizes this. That's really all there is to say.

fair shake

"No matter what Microsoft does, it's most likely not going to get a fair shake from Kroes."

Lets paraphrase that.

No matter what anyone does, they are most unlikely to get a fair shake from Microsoft.

European Union and MS

I guess the question is: Why have we in America put up with the monopolistic antics of MS for so long?? We expound the virtues of competition but it appears to take other countries to actually make it happen.

It's so easy, if you don't

It's so easy, if you don't like Windows or any other MS product, don't buy it. I don't see them forcing you to buy them. You can always install a different browser even if you have Windows.

What's with all the whining? I want to see all comercial OS's come without browsers then. Otherwise its completely unfair for a company to not be able to do business, or is the EU going communist?

Sad, I had respect for the EU. Not that I support monopolies, but the case is just retarded. It's so easy to get Ubuntu or your machine, or download Firefox in Windows, no need to involve stupid politics and laws.