Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


I'm sick of the Big Dramatic Apologies. Where's Facebook's ethical beacon?

OK, so the Facebook founder gave in -- with a Big Dramatic Apology -- and will let all those "friends" unplug the Beacon. But what we have here is Business by Apology and I'm tired of it. The methodology is this:

  1. Do something underhanded, such as violating every known privacy principle in order to monetize a social network.
  2. See if you can get away with it. See how bad the outcry is.
  3. Then apologize (with much drama) if the outcry is too much.

This seems to be the way Web companies work. Facebook has done it before (a year ago with that news feed thing). Yahoo has done it (think: Chinese dissidents). Apparently you can do any unethical thing you want -- if you come up with a really great "We simply did a bad job" apology. Next these guys will be on Oprah's couch, like the never-ending parade of celebrities whose modus operandi is just-do-it-then-apologize-profusely.

But whatever happened to thinking things through beforehand? Planning. Consulting with privacy experts. Trying it out with focus groups (much as I dislike focus groups, they would've "surfaced" this little problem of massive privacy invasion). Is that too much to ask? Maybe these businesses (and execs) are too immature to know about things like this. At Facebook, even an in-house test with its own employees would have uncovered the obvious problem with spoiled gift surprises.

Or, maybe they really did think it through and decided to give it a whirl anyway -- in good Web-2.0-everything's-beta fashion -- and see if they could get away with it. Knowing they could yank it back if they really, really had to.

Wasn't there anybody inside Facebook who said, um, "Wait a minute, we need to let folks opt out of the Beacon"? Frankly, it doesn't seem like Facebook's chief privacy officer has been a very strong watchdog.

And speaking of beacons: We need Web 2.0 execs to have a better ethical beacon.

Maybe an ethics & technology class is in order?

In the meantime, in the interests of being helpful, here are some books from my bookshelf that would provide a starter education in ethics & IT:

------------
Related:
Conventional wisdom on damage control is wrong

What People Are Saying

No Different from Others

Unfortunately, these Web companies are no different from any others. I challenge anyone to name five companies that give two cents about either their customers or their employees (just look at the airlines to see what I mean). The only thing companies care about, and this is supported by the law, is increasing shareholder value. And even there, it's the get-rich-quick speculators calling the shots, not the in-it-for-the-long-haul investors (in my mind, those who are in it for the short term don't deserve to be called investors).

Yes, I know there are good companies out there, but they're so rare these days that they get press for being so good rather than the status quo of those who treat customers and employees like dirt.

Ethics on the Web?

Ethics on the Web? Are you kidding me? The web many years ago was a good information sharing tool among the universities, etc.

Now, if anyone expects any privacy, or ethics, use the phone or snail mail.

I feel safe to say that virtually everyone in the USA has had their personal information stolen via lax security (can you say VHA, TMAX, VISA, etc...)

In any case the ethics that this country has been built on has been pushed aside by the criminals and government (illegal wire tapping, illegal email capture and scanning, etc)

enough of my rant - enjoy what you have left to yourselves...

alternatives

Please, someone give some VC to an ethical alternative to facebook...being a good (i.e. not too sold-out to advertisers) search egnine made google superior to sold-out search engines like MS/Yahoo, being a good (do no evil) social networking site would yield the same results