Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Douglas Schweitzer's picture
Douglas Schweitzer

The Security Sector

Feds encrypting millions of laptops

I was encouraged when I found out that government agencies are finally - as a whole - acknowledging the serious increase in IT security breaches. Carolyn Duffy Marsan's article in Network World points out how government agencies have been obtaining hundreds of thousands of licenses for encryption software to remedy the situation.

I suppose it was inevitable that they'd finally address the issue; after all, the public has been getting really tired of hearing over and over again how one agency after another has lost sensitive citizen data. The numerous VA incidents, and the NIH episode spring immediately to mind - laptops are especially vulnerable. Because the losses are usually the result of theft, encrypting data will go a tremendously long way toward securing personal information.

While I applaud their endeavor, they're not even halfway to their estimated total of about 2 million laptops that need to be secured (so far 800,000 licenses have been purchased). At least they're saving the taxpayers some money; the article mentions that the DAR Encryption program is available to the federal government at a cost of around $10 - $12 per laptop - a real "steal" when you consider it retails at $125 for the rest of us.

What People Are Saying

Encryption

Its about time someone started taking IT matters seriously. The business world has for years so why is the Government always so far behind?

JJ
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com

Short Answer: Congress

You asked "Why is the Government always so far behind?"

While not the whole reason, much of the blame can be attributed to how Congress prioritizes spending. If something is important but not generally known, there is no desire on Congress' part to fund the need. If something is less important but all over the press, Congress will throw tons of money at it.

My own agency is involved in protecting public safety, yet we are always pushing reasonably important projects to the back burner due to lack of funds. Then we see things like the "bridge to nowhere" and think of all the important back-burner projects we could complete with even half that much money.