Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
David Haskin's picture
David Haskin

Global Mobile

Firefox, open access and the brick wall of mobile operators

Mozilla says it is working hard to convince cellular operators to allow 3G subscribers use mobile Firefox, which, in a nutshell, demonstrates how the operators are resisting open Internet access.

Instead of allowing open Internet access, the cellular operators have long limited and controlled what users can access. This benefits operators for many reasons, but it provides virtually no benefit to users.

One reason this walled garden approach benefits cellular operators is that they get paid both by subscribers and by content providers. With open Internet access, only subscribers pay. Another benefit is that their approach reduces use of limited 3G bandwidth, meaning carriers don't have to build a more robust network.

This latter issue is much bigger than the cellular operators, who once touted their "unlimited" mobile data plans, will ever admit. But go to a place where huge numbers of technologists are gathered, such as the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January, and try to use a 3G network. With all the additional traffic, your connection will be extremely slow -- if you're able to connect at all. Making the network more robust would be expensive, another reason the operators don't want open access.

True, operators are becoming somewhat more honest about their networks' limitations. Verizon Wireless, for instance, once touted unlimited 3G access for laptop users for $60 a month. Now, it explicitly says that if you exceed 5GB of downloads per month with your $60 plan, it can throttle down your speed and, presumably, can eventually drop you as a subscriber entirely.

Those limitations are fine (for the carriers) if you only use 3G access to buy things from the carriers such as ringtones, music or video. But they're not fine (for the carrier) if their subscribers want to use 3G to approximate the desktop Internet experience. By keeping clamps on usage and controlling content, the carriers have finally been profiting from their 3G investment.

This is the brick wall that Mozilla wants to surmount as it tries to convince cellular operators to allow use of mobile Firefox, which would encourage more browsing by users of devices such as smart phones. And, for proponents of an open mobile Internet, that is why the mobile WiMax network that will be offered by Sprint, Clearwire or some combination of the two has the potential to be so disruptive.

Sprint has promised open access as well as service that will be faster and cheaper than 3G. Those factors would make WiMax more attractive than 3G and would force the other cellular operators to compete not just in terms of price, but also in terms of openness.

Doubt remains, of course, whether Sprint will get WiMax off the ground. But if it does, Mozilla's efforts -- and the larger effort to have an open mobile network -- may just succeed.

What People Are Saying

Self installation of 3rd

Self installation of 3rd party apps on smart phones? This can be done only in a limited fashion in the US. Verizon phones don't support 3rd party apps unless you buy it thru Verizon deck. Most phones in Europe and Asia support self installation of 3rd party apps because devices are not sold thru carriers. Forget apps, but even installing a ringtone on your own is a big problem in the US. Phones sold thru carriers have some functionality taken out. Many ATT phones do support 3rd party apps. In terms of devices, Blackberry phones support the 3rd party apps without much hassle. So Mozilla is trying to get carriers to either offer their browser preinstalled on the phone or let users install it on their own. Either way, to get this done on a mass scale in the US market you need the buy-in of the carriers.

What?

Come on -- every mobile phone has a browser on it already. This is typical Mozilla whining that they are the only ones that represent "the open Internet." The simple fact is that mobile Firefox is not competitive, and no amount of whining about being stonewalled is going to change that.

Why would Mozilla have to

Why would Mozilla have to convince the cellular operators?

Most smartphones allow installation of 3rd party software. If they want it pre-installed, the handset manufacturers are the people to talk to.

Sprint No WiMax

The CEO who put Sprint on the open network track got ousted. Presumably because the board didn't like his vision, and didn't believe it could improve Sprint's declining market share. The Sprint/Clearwire deal is up in the air. At the very east it won't be as expansive as it was once envisioned.

From Sprint's current ad campaigns, it's a good bet their moving away from WiMax and trying to leverage Nextel's antiquated network to improve their short term numbers. Sprint will probably get swallowed up soon enough, and the pace of cellular evolution will continue at a crawl.