Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Five features that must die in Windows 7

As it builds Windows 7, Microsoft has a chance to kill some of Windows' worst features. Here are my suggestions for the five features that must die.

1. Windows Genuine Advantage
This Vista feature is designed to combat piracy, but instead it wages war against common sense. If WGA believes that you aren't running a legitimate copy of Windows, it takes a variety of actions against you. In earlier iterations, it could in essence shut off your access to the operating system. Today, WGA isn't quite so draconian. Still, the real pirates know how to get around WGA, so it serves no purpose other than to annoy. Microsoft should get rid of it in Windows 7.

2. The Registry
The Registry is a giant, incomprehensible database of Windows settings, preferences, behaviours, and more. When you use a dialog box to make a change to how Windows works, generally it's making a change to the Registry --- often dialog boxes are mere front ends to the Registry. But to make many changes, you need to edit the Registry, and it's a tough, dangerous thing to do. Other operating systems, including Mac OS X and Linux, don't have Registries, and they work fine. It's time for Microsoft to finally kill the Registry.

3. ActiveX Controls
ActiveX controls are essentially applets delivered via Internet Explorer. They don't, however, run in other browsers. And they have the potential to be malicious. Once upon a time they served some use, but no longer. Given the growth of AJAX and Web 2.0 sites, it's clear that sophisticated applications can be delivered via the browser without ActiveX. Microsoft should finally pull the plug on this technology.

4. User Account Control
This is clearly the unanimous choice for a feature that needs to bite the dust. Sure, it offers security...but at far too high an annoyance cost, with pointless pop-ups and ridiculous intrusions. Microsoft needs to kill UAC and start from scratch.

5. Windows Meeting Center
Have you ever heard of this Vista feature? Likely not. And even if you have, you haven't used it. It's supposed to let you set up meetings over a network or the Internet either on an ad hoc or planned basis. But with no whiteboard, a worthless chat module, and no VoIP, who would ever use it? No one, of course. It's a waste of bits --- let it go.

Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed!

What People Are Saying

UAC

Instead of implementing UAC, MSFT should've bought the wonderful suDown (http://sudown.sourceforge.net) utility from its author. It is much more robust and secure, and less intrusive.

I've been dealing with Vista

I've been dealing with Vista since it was first released and even after SP1 -- I'm of the opinion that it's not worth it. The learning curve is too steep to get the OS working smoothly and efficiently and it's SO unnecessarily complicated and runs so many services that you don't need. What really burns me is how MSFT has bulldozed it's way onto most of the new PC's sold today. I can't order a new laptop without Windows (well, maybe Dell will give me Linux or no OS). I'm a total Linux convert now. Easy, secure, flexible, smart, stable (I use Ubuntu 8.04). If I absolutely have to use a Windows program, WINE will run it in Linux... or, for those fussy programs I keep XP Pro on a separate partition I can boot into. Hopefully I can delete that partition soon as Linux matures and gets more user-friendly by the day.

I agree UAC is a pest and WGA is a joke (easily circumvented) and the registry is probably the dumbest idea ever promulgated by any OS company.

Windows longevity

MSFT is right to not promote any particular version of Windows in their ads. Many people still use 98/2000/XP because they STILL WORK well and do what they need them to do. AAPL being a boutique seller of overpriced items doesn`t care about longevity , as they are known to throw out the OS AND hardware platform and start over. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery...ever notice Apple copied us PC users and now they ARE A PC ?
Remember the lies about Power PC being better and the Velocity Engine (SSE extensions on a PC). With Apple , it`s all about marketing and the impression their products are better. BSOD ? Have not seen one in years , but I listen to a radio show by a well-known Mac person , and do hear of people calling in (Mac users) with networking issues , spinning "beach balls" etc.
MSFT didn`t lose way over half it`s market cap during the last few weeks , but AAPL sure did. Microsoft is the company you can rely on for the long haul...AAPL is the Sharper Image of the computer industry. And during the new economic downturn , AAPL will continue to lose market cap.
BTW , typed on a five year old PC display unit with 1024 MB RAM upgraded video card for the latest games. Apple/games ? snicker , snicker.Does Apple even make anything they expect people to use five years later ?

New products from Old

As a Desktop Linux user and Desktop Linux advocate, I'd still be happy to pay $30 for a Virtual "Appliance" that let be run virtualized Windows 98 or Windows 2000 on a Linux system. I'd probably buy one of each at that price.

All Microsoft would have to do is put it on their web site, and let me give them my PayPal payment.

That would be a nice little market for Microsoft, and would also make Windows management much easier. If it goes south, you just reload the backup image from the USB drive.

Sure, my laptop came with a Windows XP license (with optional free upgrade to Vista that I never used), and I can use VMWare Converter to create the image, but that all takes time, and I need an extra laptop drive for the Linux/Virtual Windows configuration.

If Microsoft let me download their "official" appliance, I know I'm getting a good image, and I know that I can reinstall it when I need it (even on the road), and I can just trash the XP drive and replace it with Linux.

With Linux, I get the firewall and security tools, and I can use Symantic or McAffee antivirus/anti-spyware. And Windows 2000 or Windows 98 can work in a MUCH smaller footprint.

yes vista has a few errors

yes vista has a few errors but really xp did to in sp1 vista will come out with sp2 or windows 7 whatever they want to call it, personally i have a few problems with vista but those are nothing that cant be fixed in the next sp or os.

There is some serious bias

There is some serious bias on this board. Reading I noted that anyone who supports Vista in any way has negative votes.

The tragedy in this is that Apple has done an incredibly successful job at beating down Vista even before it hit. So, naturally everyone who is a sheep and not a leader jumps on the bandwagon and trashes Vista. It's amazing how many people even tell me that they have never used it but continue to trash it. How anyone can do that is beyond me because I never take anyone's word for it, I have to try it muyself.

I did. I love it. It's far more intuitive than XP and the built-in help smashes XP in the perverbial mouth. I wouldn't go back to XP if you paid me too. To date my systems have not crashed, I've had no problems finding drivers, everything boots up fast and works the way it's supposed too, my home network runs great - oh, and the parental controls are just out of this world. Amazing what you can do with them and everytime I log in, a full report of each child's activities is waiting for me to look at. The RIAA will not be after me anytime - ever!

Now, I did kill UAC and told it not to ever bother me again. To me, that's the only blight on the whole O/S. I don't use Meeting Space and could care less if it's there or not. Someone else may find it useful.

I don't get why people are so afraid of this O/S. Apparently Apple was - it scared them to death. Thus their campaign to destroy it.

The rest of you can say what you will about Vista, but after using it, I'm of the firm belief that anything you say negatively about it will be automatically negated from the experience of having used it. You're all wrong about it!

Bias

"There is some serious bias on this board. Reading I noted that anyone who supports Vista in any way has negative votes."

I agree, whenever I post supporting child slave labor I get negative votes, must be bias!

know-not user

>I don't get why people are so afraid of this
>O/S. Apparently Apple was - it scared them to
>death. Thus their campaign to destroy it.

Not scared, upset! After so many years this is the stinker that MS serves us? And so expensive? You pay to be a beta tester? It is the worst OS that MS has ever produced. XP was the best ever so far. Apple has used the opportunity to point out that their Mac OS X is better and it is. It was hard to resist capitalizing on so much bad news about Vista for them, heck, when will people get how good Mac OS X is? I am using Windows, OS X and Linux, and prefer Linux, but try to avoid Vista at all costs. Whenever I have to use Windows, I use XP.

And you cannot destroy Vista or MS, because of loyal know-nothing people like you that gives them your money happily and is so satisfied with a mediocre product. Let's make sure you remember that next time you have to pay even more for a Microsoft OS that you remember that you helped them reach that monopoly position.

>The rest of you can say what you will about
>Vista, but after using it, I'm of the firm
>belief that anything you say negatively about

Good for you to believe. We know from facts. I am an IT expert and have seen so much go wrong with Vista.. heck, do you read news on the internet? Seems like you don't.. internal memos from Microsoft themselves indicated that they don't like it and they should know.
It is not all bad mouthing, do you remember XP? Did you see any bad news like this then, such bad reputation? no, because XP was good.
Vista is not. Just because you have very low standard, use hardly any hardware devices, software and don't care about a speedy OS and good performance does not mean the rest of the world does.

>it will be automatically negated from the
>experience of having used it. You're all
>wrong about it!

No, you are. Trust me, the rest of the world knows what they are talking about.
Reputation does not develop by itself. And no, Apple did not fabricate it, they jumped on the bandwagon when the negative news was already running a while.

"do you remember XP? Did

"do you remember XP? Did you see any bad news like this then, such bad reputation? no, because XP was good.
Vista is not. Just because you have very low standard, use hardly any hardware devices, software and don't care about a speedy OS and good performance does not mean the rest of the world does"

Er maybe you need to look back XP had worse coverage then Vista did.

What about WGA?

You can't truly say you love Vista unless you agree that WGA is good, effective, and necessary, right?

Yes, I have tried Vista. Among my experiences: I have tried to set up a neighbor's networking through the insanely bizarre new interfaces involved, I have also attempted to install Firefox on another Vista owner's computer. You can read about my experience at my blog if you care to.

I believe that Vista makes life more difficult for a majority of its users. Why totally rework the interface? Why force users to relearn how to do things? And I'm not mentioning the beaucoups of other issues.

Since none of this applies to you, my hat's off to you for achieving computer Nirvana. But honestly, you blame Apple for Vista's bad press?