Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Five programs you can afford in a financial meltdown

It's the afternoon of September 30th and for reasons beyond my understanding the NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) is up more than 3.5% after yesterday's financial fiasco. Hello, Wall Street, what part of "No one has a new bailout deal; the House hated the old deal, and it's the week of Rosh Hashanah so it won't be a full week at Congress anyway" do you not understand? Even if you believe the bailout will magically work wonders for the economy -- I don't -- it's not going to happen this week.

No matter what happens to the bailout, it's a safe bet that times are going to be hard. So what can you do if you're not in Congress and you want to get new programs, but not pay an arm and a leg? After all, it's not like you can print money. Unlike, say, the U.S. government. The choice is clear: switch to open-source software.

Like what you ask? Like these five prime examples of open-source software that's every bit as good, if not better, than their proprietary equivalents.

1) Microsoft Office: OpenOffice. Here's your choice: You can pay about a $110 street price for Microsoft Office Home and Student 2007, which includes the basics office trilogy of Excel, PowerPoint, and Word, plus OneNote, Microsoft's take on a digital notebook, or you can pay nothing, Nada, for OpenOffice.

If there's anything you can't do in OpenOffice, which is soon upgrading to version 3.0, that you can do in Microsoft Office, I don't know what it is. There's also, as far as I can tell, almost no learning curve in moving from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice. I flip back and forth between the two office suites and I honestly can barely tell the difference between them whether I'm writing, working out my budget on a spreadsheet or - shudder! -- working on a presentation.

2) Outlook: Thunderbird. If you want to do real e-mail on Windows with Microsoft products, you're pretty much stuck with Outlook. I hate Outlook. A long time ago I called Outlook a security hole that masquerades as an e-mail client. I haven't seen any reason to change my opinion. It's amazing to me, even now, to contemplate just how many ways Outlook allows trouble to come visiting your computer. Thunderbird, on the other hand, has nothing like Outlook's problems.

I'm not crazy about Thunderbird 2.0.0.17. It's a good, solid program, but I feel it's been neglected by Mozilla since it was spun off as a project on to itself so Mozilla could focus its attention on Firefox. That said, I'll take it over Outlook any day of the week.

Besides you can either buy Outlook 2007, as a stand alone program for about $90, or as part of Microsoft Office Standard 2007 for $315, or you can download Thunderbird. The price of the Thunderbird download: Zero. Zip.

3) Quicken: GnuCash. Chances are you've heard of the other programs I've mentioned, but GnuCash 2.2.7 may be new to you. It shouldn't be. It's an outstanding money management program. And, if there's anything we need right now, it's some good money management.

GnuCash has all the important features of Quicken and some of those of QuickBooks, Intuit's small business accounting program. Beside the basics of managing cash flow and checking accounts, it can also handle invoicing, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The program also works with OFX DirectConnect and HBCI (Home Banking Computer Interface) so you can use it online with the same banks, credit card companies, and so on that you use Quicken with today. Finally, it lets you import data from Quicken and Microsoft Money, so you won't need to rebuild your financial data.

Have I mentioned the price yet? That's right: zilch. Quicken Starter Edition 2009? It will cost you about $30.

4) SharePoint: Alfresco. Microsoft SharePoint Server, to give it its due, does a fine job of organizing users' information so that you can easily get to it from a Web-based interface. There are just two things. One, it's proprietary, and, two; there's nothing SharePoint can do that Alfresco can't do. I mean that quite literally. When Microsoft was forced by the European Union to cough up its proprietary network protocols, it had to open up the SharePoint Protocol. So Alfresco starting adding support for the SharePoint Protocol so soon any application that can use SharePoint can also use Alfresco.

And, of course, you can always get directly to your information from any Web browser. I do hope though that you'll use Firefox or Chrome.

If you thought the cost savings with GnuCash over Quicken was small change, here's something that will get your CFO's attention. SharePoint requires you not only to buy the server, but also SQL Server and Windows Server 2003 or 2008, CALs (Client Access Licenses), and a hodgepodge of other odds and ends of Microsoft server software. My back-of-envelope calculations give me a cost, for five ordinary user CALs, getting everything on the cheap, and no list prices here, for about five grand. Alfresco? Do it yourself and it won't cost you a dime.

5) Windows: Linux. I know some of you think that you're not paying Microsoft because "the operating system comes free on my computer!" No, it doesn't. But, I'm not going to get into that discussion now.

What I will point out though is that no one in their right mind runs Windows without security software. That means people buy, at a minimum, an anti-virus program. If you go for the whole she-bang of anti-virus, firewall, anti-spam, etc. etc., Norton Internet Security 2009 will sock your wallet for $50. Linux doesn't need a lot of that junk and what it does need, like a firewall, comes bundled in it.

Any questions? Besides asking me, you can also visit the Open Source as Alternative, where you'll find just about every "I want an open-source equivalent to 'blank' question answered.

What People Are Saying

Bad article, naive author??

Quote from Author
"What I will point out though is that no one in their right mind runs Windows without security software. That means people buy, at a minimum, an anti-virus program. If you go for the whole she-bang of anti-virus, firewall, anti-spam, etc. etc., Norton Internet Security 2009 will sock your wallet for $50. Linux doesn't need a lot of that junk and what it does need, like a firewall, comes bundled in it."

Either your some sort of information skewing fanboy, or just don't know what your talking about. Either way, a firewall has been bundled with windows since XP, and windows defender (known as one of the best anti malware programs) is available for free (and is bundled with Vista). Virus scanning software (such as Trendmicro's House Call) are free as well.

Because Linux is open source, it is significantly more open to attack. If it ever surpasses the .9% market share it currently holds and large companies actually decide to use the OS for important tasks, it will become a target like Windows. When that happens, people will remember the articles like this that said "Linux is secure!" and realize the truth.

I'm am a MCITP and a MCTS so I'm not spewing misinformation. Oh, and I typed this comment to you in Safari 4 (developer prerelease) on my Mac Book Pro... Not a fan boy either.

Don't forget Courier for Email

I have had good luck with Courier email from
http://www.rosecitysoftware.com/ ...

It does everything I need, keeps everything in
one database for easy transfer between machines,
and seems to be very efficient.

:)

Google Apps

Along the same lines as OpenOffice, I highly recommend Google Apps. Google offers a free Standard Edition, which includes Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Docs and Google Sites. The Premier Edition is priced very competitively at $50/year.

the problem with google apps

Here is what I see as the problems with Google Apps, or any Software as a Service design. To me the problems don't lie in the cost of the product.

1) What happens when you have no net-connection. You've lost your email, you've lost some docs. (Network connection loss could be due to traveling, natural disaster, accident, mistake, or maintenance).

2) Where are those things stored? Do you have them on your hardware, or do you have to go on the whims of someone else? If they upgrade, do you have a choice of when you upgrade your side?

3) Backup and restore, see number 2.

4) Who besides you / your company has access to your data?

5) You've just added more network overhead to your external pipes because everyone is going to google (or whatever SaaS provider) to get the data, that a well developed internal network could do.

Google offline

Google is working to enable their products to be used offline (if they haven't finished that already).
As for storage, naturally Google will store them all online in their data warehouse, as well as provide a way for you to download them to your local machine.
Google docs uses odf, which is also the default format of OpenOffice, so even if you didn't have access to Google docs, you can still open and manipulate the documents you have downloaded.

On the other hand, the only major benefit of using Google Docs over OpenOffice is that Google Docs is available anywhere you have internet access, and you are guaranteed to be using the same version of the software without having to download anything.

As for quality of software, Google Docs still has a ways to go before it catches up with Open/MS Office.

As to me if everyone

As to me if everyone declears that we live in a market economy then we should let this economy drive the situation, not these small politicians

SharePoint vs. Alfresco

Steven:

Thanks for the notice. SharePoint is actually good software, but somewhat limited. If all you want to do is Microsoft Office document collaboration (and you already have Microsoft SQL Server as your database, Windows as your server, IIS, ActiveDirectory, etc. etc.), then SharePoint is a good tool.

But then, Alfresco does exactly the same Microsoft Office collaboration, and I'd argue that we actually do Office integration and collaboration better than Microsoft does. (You don't have to believe me - you can download the software and give it a spin.) We also do it with whatever OS you want, whatever database you want, whatever application server you want, etc.

Not only that, we can do integration with a company's website (publish documents to the web as many of our large financial services and government customers do) with a robust web content management offering (used by Sears, Activision, Electronic Arts, and others) that Microsoft can't match. We can do heavy content collaboration, as we do at share.adobe.com, that Microsoft's SharePoint is both too weak and too focused on Office documents to be able to handle. SharePoint is a solid first try. But it only goes so far.

Oh, and because we're 100% open source and open standards, it's as easy to get content out of Alfresco as it is to get it into Alfresco. Don't like it? Leave it. There's no upfront license fee locking up your budget and no proprietary repository locking in your content. If we don't do our job, our customers leave. (With a 95% renewal rate, including among big financial services companies, I think our record speaks for itself.)

To add to your list, however, why stop at five? Why not add SugarCRM to replace your company's proprietary CRM system. Replace Microsoft Exchange with Zimbra. Replace your proprietary BI solution with JasperSoft or Pentaho. And so on. There is finally choice again in enterprise software.

Email:Evolution

Steven,

I am surprised you didn't recommend Evolution. ?

--Dietrich

agreed, but...

I too am surprised there was no mention of Evolution for email. However, unless things have changed in the last 4 months, Evolution had big issues on Vista. I use it on my Linux(Ubuntu) laptop and it is very much equal to Outlook on that platform.

Leaving the (MS) Office

I've used MS Office since the late, lamented WordPerfect DOS bit the dust in the late nineties. In 2003, I decided to write a 300-page book in OpenOffice because I'd suffered too many crashes and scary file manglings with MS Word. I have to say, OpenOffice Writer is MUCH better than MS Word 2007. Sure, you can find matching features in both programs, but OpenOffice is far more STABLE. I first used MS Word in the late 1980s. Twenty years later, it's still got a ton of bugs, not to mention features that Word users have complained about during all that time. (Bulleted lists!) It's as simple as this: OpenOffice developers listen to their customers; MS doesn't.