Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Five reasons to fire Ballmer

On July 1st, Bill Gates will retire. He'll still spend about 20% of his time on Microsoft projects. If Microsoft is to retain 20% of its economic clout in five years time, the company's board should start working on firing CEO Steve Ballmer now.

Why? Because Ballmer has been in charge of Microsoft for the last several years and he's been running it into the ground. Even before Gates announced that he was going to retire, Ballmer was already in charge and his record of failure speaks for itself.

1) The Vista Technology Flop. Technically, Vista was crap. You don't have to believe people like me who think Vista, a year and a service patch since its release, is still an over-priced joke pretending to be an operating system. But, maybe you will believe Microsoft's top-level executives when they say its trash.

Who was at the wheel of the good ship Microsoft during the tens of thousands of man-years and billions of dollars to create Vista? That would be CEO/captain Steve Ballmer.

2) The Vista Business Failure: Microsoft has managed to sell junk before but this time it had set itself an impossible job. Vista does nothing better than XP except to cost more, require greater system resources, and give users new headaches with device problems and UAC (User Account Control).

That's a hard sell. In fact, it's an impossible sell. Ballmer denies that Vista sales are poor but in the last reported quarter, Microsoft operating systems sales were down 24% even though PC sales were up 15%.

Ballmer denies that Vista was at fault. In a way, he's right. If Ballmer, who is an overgrown salesman, thinks sales dropping while the market is expanding means Vista is doing well, he clearly deserves a lot of the blame.

 


Related Post

 

Honest technology executives


 

3) The Yahoo Fiasco: If Microsoft had pulled off the hostile takeover of Yahoo, it would have been the biggest acquisition in the company's history. It would have given the company a real presence in both the Web search market and in online advertising. Ballmer couldn't close the deal.

Maybe the acquisition would have worked. Maybe it wouldn't have. I can argue either side of this case. Ballmer didn't just screw the pooch, though he drove Yahoo into becoming buddies with Microsoft's arch-enemy Google. Smooth move dude.

If anything ever does come out of Microsoft/Yahoo it will be because Carl Ichan has taken an interest in the proposed deal, not because of anything Ballmer did.

4) The Fall of Microsoft Office. Remember when Microsoft was talking up how great the initial sales of Office 2007 were? A year later, in Microsoft's third quarter results, we see that Office's operating income has dropped from $3.4 billion, to $3.1 billion. Microsoft Office income declining!? Isn't that a little like Exxon reporting declining profits in the summer of the $4 gallon of gas?

Even more telling is that Microsoft, yes Microsoft, has now confessed that they can't support their own Open XML standard, but that they will support ODF and PDF in Office. You know, the 'enemy' document formats.

As Anders Bylund of The Motley Fool put it, "I can't say that Google or Sun or anybody else just won a bigger share of the office software market, and if they did, it won't help their revenue or profits directly anyway. But it's clear as day that Microsoft just took a serious hit, and the impact may take a long time to make itself felt but it will come." And, what does Bylund predict may happen come that day? "The company's biggest revenue generator may be a shadow of its former self in a few years. I just hope that Microsoft has some alternative business prospects on tap -- and no, tackling Google's search hulk head-on doesn't count."

5) Who doesn't love you baby? The stock market that's who. Today, Microsoft's stock is wobbling just over $28. The 52-week high was $37.50. What do you think will happen to Microsoft's stock when Bill officially retires? It won't be pretty.

Rationally, since Gates has been hands off at Microsoft for years, it shouldn't make a difference, but the stock market tends to think with its gut, not Adam Smith's rational 'invisible hand.' Now, take a long hard look at Ballmer and his record. Do you see a leader? I don't and I suspect neither will Microsoft's Board as Ballmer continues to drag Microsoft down.

If he does get sacked, don't worry about him though. Besides being a billionaire in his own right, Ballmer can always get a gig on Dancing with the Stars. He is, after all, quite the... dancer.

What People Are Saying

Unless they change their

Unless they change their filesystem structure, nothing else will matter.

Five Reasons why Steven J.

Five Reasons why Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols should be fired:

1) Doesn't seem to understand business. Specifically "The Fall of Office." Office 2007 is one of the biggest releases to come along in a long time...quarterly earnings change almost constantly...

2) Likes to follow the rest of the jaded journalism by bashing Vista. Hey, it's easy to bash Vista...everyone does it because it's easy and people read it. It takes a truly brave writer to defend Vista...

3) Do you understand stocks? No, Steven, you don't...apparently just about every other company in the market has lost their CEO's because just about every company on the market today is down...so why should Microsoft be any different? Also, I believe the share price has already adjusted to Gate's departure...they know what happens before it actually happens...it's called the stock market, have you heard of it?

4) Ballmer doesn't work alone. While he was involved with the Yahoo "fiasco," Ballmer definitely doesn't do anything by himself...he's not the only one behind it...

5) Sheer bias. You are a bias writer plain and simple. It's clear you don't think too highly of Microsoft. When writing in an objective piece like this, keep Ballmer the focus and how Microsoft will be affected rather than telling us how much you think MS sucks and how Ballmer will make it worse...

Well, you should be fired, plain and simple...

Since the home computer has

Since the home computer has been out, I was a serious user of any platform that gave me power at a good price. I was a serious Amiga user until the company, by their own lack of business smarts, went under. The power-in-my-hands loss of the Amiga left me in an inferior world of troubles/frustration. I used Apple and M$ both. I never was satisfied at the inherent limitations in both.

The people of the US have always been media-drugged. M$ has always given inferior products when more powerful technology existed. They have milked the public for all they can get as a habit. And the blind masses have gladly followed.

I extensively used both Apple and M$ over the last 10 years. Finally I feel like the power is back in my hands with a new iMac and OS X. OS X Tiger was way ahead of any M$ product. When Vista came out, I was hopeful. Meanwhile OS X was upgraded by OS X Leopard. So now I am not only ahead, I am light years ahead. And one of the best parts is that OS X is just a UNIX GUI - akin to Linux - in fact we use the same shell - BASH.

And, just in case I would want to run a Winows only program - I do have XP installed and can run it as a native operating system and not an emulation (or both at the same time!).

To Mr. Gates, for the frustration I have had to face, and his taking advantage of the public, I say good riddance. Now let's hope Ballmer leaves and someone can take over who will run the Co. for the benefit of the people instead of focusing on reaping huge profits resulting from the mindless way the masses fork over tons of $ for inferior product.

Ex Microsoft Cheerleader

I have been a big Microsoft cheerleader for years, but their anti-piracy initiatives have become so intrusive that the only MS product I've purchased in the last 5 years is Win XP Home on a recent Dell laptop purchase. MS doesn't seem to get it. I'm perfectly happy wit my Office 2003 and WinXP. I'm dual booting Ubuntu Linux on my laptop and replaced XP Pro on my home server with Ubuntu. I'd call MS stock a "sell."

You forgot arrogance

One more reason is the sickening arrogance of Ballmer. He thinks he is god and that Microsoft is there to liberate humanity. I don't say he has any malicious intent, he is just so self-consumed and detached from reality that he really thinks that this is the case.
BUT, there is a reason to keep Ballmer. No other CEO can run a company that successfully and make boat loads of cash with such a crappy product and absolutely horrible service. We have to give him credit for finding millions of stupid people who have no better thing to do, but to give all their money to Microsoft. In that light, Ballmer is irrelevant and we should fire the mindless consumers.

The hand

Actually, as information has become cheaper and more commonplace, the market has taken on more of the characteristics of Smith's Invisible Hand. That $28 share price has Gates' departure baked in.

The market trades well ahead of the news cycle. If you're planning on shorting Microsoft stock on the day of Gates' departure, you're in for some pain. I doubt the price will move much at all.

From my experience I can say

From my experience I can say that although business customers are buying Vista many use advantage of downgrade rights and deploy Windows XP instead of Vista so Vista sales numbers does not show real Vista market share.

Huh?

Is this the dumbest guy ever? "Microsoft, has now confessed that they can't support their own Open XML standard." What the ****? Microsoft got on board and supported an inferior standard to promote interoperabilty. How does that imply they don't "support" their own format?

How does that imply they don't "support" their own format?

Because they don't. The ISO DIS29500 standard is not supported by Microsoft Office 2007, and Microsoft has stated that it will not be supported until the next version of Office is released.

DIS29500 is a standard with NO successful implementations. None. Microsoft won't support the standard that they fought to get adopted, until the next version of Office is released, possibly in 2010.

And that is a long time in the future.

Oh, come off it!

I agree that Ballmer deserves the boot at Microsoft for various failed projects, but from some of the responses I have read to this article, you would think that a less-than-mediocre company producing less-than quality products managed to become number one through sheer luck! It just didn't happen that way. MS has, in the past, put out some extremely fine products. MS/DOS 5.0, when it came out, was considered the best OS by reviewers--it got quite good reviews. Ditto for Word, Excel and Powerpoint at various times in their past. MS can produce good quality. The fact that it's not doing so now should not shadow that truth,as unpopular as the company may be.