Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Five reasons why it's not business as usual for Microsoft

Bill Gates will be leaving Microsoft for good at the end of the month and Microsoft would have you believe that it will be business as usual for Microsoft. I understand they also have a great bridge between Manhattan and Brooklyn that they'd like to sell you. Cheap!

1) You can't replace genius. Steve Ballmer is moving into the top slot, but I've met Bill Gates, and Steve Ballmer is no Bill Gates. He's a big, bouncy sales guy.

Can't you just see Ballmer selling used cars on a local TV ad spot? Instead of running around a stage shouting: "Developers! Developers!" just visualize him running around a car lot shouting, "Cars! Cars!" I find it far too easy to do just that. This is the man who's going to replace Bill Gates? I don't think so.

Besides, he already has a track record as acting head of the company, and it's lousy. Fire Ballmer now, why wait for him to fall on his face?

2) Microsoft has already dropped Vista. Microsoft officials will never admit it, but there's no question about it: They've given up on Vista.

In its place, Microsoft is talking up with Windows 7. It's beginning to sound more and more like Windows 7 will show up in 2009.

My question: How is Microsoft going to get Windows 7 right in two years of rushed development when they made such a flop of Vista with five years? I can't see it.

3) Microsoft's already lost its technical expertise. How do you think Vista became such a mess in the first place? If you read Mini-Microsoft, the answer's clear: Microsoft has become mired in big company internal politics and -- The horror! The horror! -- meaningless process.

It's not just Vista though. Take, for example, the miserable fiasco that is Windows Home Server. All this stupid software/hardware package was supposed to do was operate as a basic file server. How could you blow this? Don't ask me, but Microsoft managed it with software that managed to corrupt files when you tried to edit or save them... with Microsoft's own programs!

Come on! I can create my own Linux home server and it will work just by clicking a few buttons on any modern Linux distribution. Which reminds me: What's the point of Windows Home Server anyway when I can just buy a terabyte or so of NAS (network attached storage) for a few hundred bucks?

4) New leadership will step forward to rescue Microsoft. OK, like who? I happen to like Ray Ozzie, Microsoft's chief software architect, but he's not a dynamic leader. As for the rest, well, who do you think have been 'helping' Ballmer steer the good ship Microsoft into shoal waters anyway?

If there's a real next generation of leadership, as opposed to middle managers, I sure haven't seen them. You?

5) Last, but not least, Microsoft has lost its vision. Think about it. Microsoft didn't see the shift coming to cheap, lightweight laptops. So, now Microsoft has had to reverse itself and give XP Home a new lease on life. I'm quite sure that they'll also soon have to bring XP Pro out of retirement too.

Even when Microsoft knows darn well what's happening, like its constant erosion of Web browser share to Firefox, it seems to be unable to play catch up. Here's a small bet. By year's end, there will be more people using Firefox 3 than Internet Explorer 8. Do I have any takers?

What do all these things have in common? They're all going to happen or have been happening because Gates is no longer in charge. If you think Microsoft is the "can do no wrong" economic Goliath of the late 90s and early 00s, you are so wrong. It's only going to get worse for Microsoft, a lot worse.

RSS feed icon Like this stuff? Subscribe to the RSS feed.

What People Are Saying

Mox NIx

"Do I have any takers?"

Windows users will gravitate to IE8 as they replace existing machines with new ones and IE8 is installed as part of the package. Whether or not people download Firefox matters very little to Microsoft's fortunes, since people using Firefox are using it on Windows just like people using Quicken or TuboTax or Adobe stuff are using it on Windows. No skin off Microsoft's nose.

MSFT *does* care about Firefox

Every home or business computer using Firefox is another reason for developers to stay away from using Microsoft-specific code. When IE6 ruled the roost, lots of web pages didn't work with any other browser. Only when Firefox started becoming popular did the developers start turning away, and thats when MSFT took notice and started work on IE7, a browser whose features are all cribbed from others.

Five reasons why it's not business as usual for Microsoft

I have heard people observe recently that the high percentage of Windows desktops combined with the high number of Windows viruses and malware are a risk to the county, bit government and public. I mixture of platforms would be a more health environment, in that if a particular platform became problematic, the alternative platforms would still be operational. Something terrible could happen to Windows machines nationwide. We hate to think so, but a surprising number of viruses and malware events have occurred. I for one would feel more comfortable if there were a more even mix of platforms. I can see that it does complicate the support picture, but I don't like thinking about a world with Windows Everywhere.

I completely agree with

I completely agree with every word. Great article...right on the money.

5 years for Vista, 2 years for Win7 ???

Agreed with every point (even though SJVN hates the 4 Freedoms!) made but the one thing I hadnt thought of before (or cared) is how bad is Win7 going to be when they will have to rush it when they took their sweet time with Vista and botched it up?

Until then, their strongest card is an OS that came out in 2001 (you could say its technology dates from another era).

By the time Win7 comes out, Apple will have taken more of the high end market and Linux squeezing them from the bottom.

As someone who uses three OS at work and at home, I have yet to see dramatic increases in desktop usability over the years (unless you count abortions that were Mac 8 and 9 ). There is more eye candy like Compiz but the GUI concept hasnt really involved.
Sure, the touch concept will be more in use but it will not replace the current paradigm.
Win7 will not be bringing in new concepts. A nicer interface, some rearragements but nothing they can do will make the world stand in awe.

And "It Just Works" will not be enough for Win7.

and rather than chop the head off the beast and fix things....

Big business arrogance would be where you can find the root.

It was ever so obvious that the "windows game" vista branding, with all it's malarky promises for ease of development and common architecture, 'supreme' grfx, physx and audio was, and still is, a blatant attempt to drive the pc game market to consoles.

Son's Bday prez was PS3 with the works, staying with xp on all 7 boxes, advise against MS regularly, not even picking up the updates - since they have intentionally bugged them.

Even that festering pile of crud, amd-ati, has gotten into the act by not fixing serious issues for xp requiring very old drivers (6.x)

Nvidia and intel all the way now.