Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Five things I want in Windows 8

I've been using Windows 7 for quite a while now, and it's an impressive piece of work. But there are plenty of improvements that can be made --- here are some first thoughts on five things I'd like to see in Windows 8.

Include better networking support

I'm a big fan of the Network and Sharing Center and the network map introduced by Windows Vista, although I'm still not sold on Windows 7's Homegroup networking feature. But both operating systems have one drawback --- it's still too tough to mix Linux, PCs, and Macs on a Windows network. Forget finger pointing at which operating system is at fault. Microsoft should make sure that Windows 8 immediately recognizes and works with both Linux and Mac OS X.

Offer true multimedia sharing at home

The TV as we know it will soon be dead. With sites like Hulu.com, and with Windows Media Center's newfound ability to play Netflix movies, the PC has finally supplanted it. But watching media on a PC simply won't cut it. There needs to be better ways to stream video and audio content to TVs, stereos, and other multimedia devices throughout a house. Yes, I know it can be done now --- but it's far from easy. It needs to be simple, and built directly into Windows.

Improve the task bar and task switching

The Windows 7 Mac OS X Dock-like task bar is far superior to previous versions of the task bar, doing double-duty as an application launcher and task switcher. But it's still somewhat confusing to use; its two functions have yet to be perfectly integrated. Microsoft needs to work on that.

In addition, how about niftier ways to do task switching, so that you can open, arrange and hide windows in more ways?

Use built-in intelligence

Windows should learn from me over time how I use the operating system and adjust itself accordingly. It already does this to a certain extent, by pre-loading components of commonly used apps when you start up. But Windows should be even smarter. If it notices over time that I use certain Control Panel applets, but not others, it should bring the common applets to the forefront and hide the others, for example. It should examine my Internet connection and the way I commonly use it, and adjust the networking plumbing accordingly to give me top performance. There are plenty of other ways it can learn from me as well and adjust how it looks and works.

Run Mac OS X

Mac OS X let you run Windows as a dual-boot option --- Microsoft should follow suit and do the same for Mac OS X. Yes, I know that this one is a pipe-dream for countless reasons, not the least of which is that Apple's lawyers would be all over Microsoft in a Cupertino minute if Microsoft built this feature into Windows. But I can dream, can't I?

What People Are Saying

Nooooooooooo,,,,,,,,

"[Control Panel] should bring the common applets to the forefront and hide the others, for example"

No, no a thousand times NO! It's Office 2003's "amazing changing menus" all over again.

People learn the LOCATION of options; they don't read the labels and examine the icons! If Windows constantly shifts items around based on its best guess as to what I might want at the moment, it doesn't help - it slows me down.

One of Window's biggest flaws today is its determined insenstence to "help" me when I don't want help. Let ME do the learning; it should do the computing.

Please, please stop "helping" me. Make it easier, not more clever!

i think most of the features

i think most of the features are already included, may be windows needs extra network security.but still its we who have to install good AV to protect the system.

Keep your computer running like new.

Have you been searching for a great antispyware to keep your computer running like new? If so, you will be happy to know that there are some great options out there. I have tried many different types of antispyware only to find that the majority of them find the exact same types of bugs. The biggest difference that you will find between all the different types of antispyware offered is the price. Orbasoft Antispyware is an excellent choice that can be purchased at a lower price than many of the other options available. If you are interested in discovering the benefits offered from antispyware solution from Orbasoft visit http://www.orbasoft.com to learn more.

Well, one feature I think

Well, one feature I think will give bang-for-the-buck is that Microsoft includes built-in spell-checking in all input fields.

Why should every application include its own spell-checking engine when Microsoft can built it into the operating system, thus sharing the engine across all applications.

Regards,
/Michael

What???

" Microsoft should make sure that Windows 8 immediately recognizes and works with both Linux and Mac OS X. "
That is BS... why is it MS that needs to supply the interropability, and not Linux or Mac?? Since they're praised for being better and having no virus, more stable and all, they should have more time on their hands to built that kind of interopability into their OS to talk to Windows. I want more natural interface enhancement. Win7 is a good start with multi-tough, now let's go to the next level, and addvoice recognition to the mix.

It should be everyone

It's just not Windows that needs to network with Linux and Mac, its all operating systems that need to network with other operating systems.

Why should it be otherwise?

In fact I'll go further, software companies should add the necessary code so that their software either works with any operating system or include different versions on the installation disc so that their product will function with any OS.

You're stupid, aren't you?

Because Linux has always supplied all the interoperability they could possibly have. All their source code is public so anyone is able and free to write any interoperability modules. Mac OS X is also following all the open standards they could get their hands on. Now let's see, who refuses to release interoperability info and constantly obfuscates the small crumbs of information that manage to escape in the wild ? Why our friends at Microsoft of course! If it were not for EU lawsuits those poor guys at Samba team would still be using witchcraft to try to figure out how MS protocols are working. Mind you though they're still playing a lot of catch-up because Microsoft really, really does not know how to extract interface specifications info from their protocols.

Awww.....

I guess you've never worried (or perhaps cared) about trying to protect or profit from your own intellectual property. Microsoft was only forced to release information about their protocols because of their market share.

And note the word "their". They developed them, they patented them, they own them, they can publish or not publish as they please. Windows wasn't written by kind-hearted people who aren't concerned about making money.

I'm quite sure they have very detailed interface specs on their protocols for their own use. They only have to release sufficient detail for others to use them and they don't have to make them easy to use.

Linux is nice because of source code availability, but that also means there are literally thousands of badly coded patches, upgrades, etc. Not to mention more than a few "patches" that install trojans and rootkits (before you start any rabid denials, I've actually seen them).

Not anyone can write interoperability modules, you still need to understand the OS, the protocols, a fair bit of network theory and know how to program.

No OS is perfect, we use what we want when we can, and make do when we don't have a choice.

Understand this

As opposed to Windows, there is plenty of evidence out there to say that no trojans, viruses, or rootkits are found in the wild for linux. If you want to mess up a Linux installation, you have to purposely install software with malware in it.
This is extremely difficult to do unless the user does not know what they are doing. Does Linux malware exist? Yes. Is it common? almost non-existant actually.

How many Mac OSX botnets exist? 1 that I know of, if you donwnloaded and installed the pirated iWork 2009 edition.

Let's compare this to XP, where an SP2 installation can be comprimised in 20 minutes if connected to the internet. Now Linux on the other hand, is even older than XP and is infinitely more secure.
I'm not too familiar with Vista, but it's fairly easy to take control of.

I'm fairly knowledgeable about the Linux-side OS, protocols, and networking to know that many writers for free and open software go the extra mile to ensure compatibility. Microsoft has no need or desire to. After all, GNU/Linux is their greatest competitor.

http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/23/bill-gates-afraid-of-gnu-linux/

Who needs a virtual xp machine running in the background of their latest and greatest OS? Microsoft of course! So much for compatibility.
I can do the same thing on Linux without paying a SECOND windows fee.
And for that matter, paying a third-party company 50 dollars a year to keep my pc safe by acting as malware itself. (Anti-virus)

Good Job Preston

Another fantastic article...you're my boy Blue!! Next time you have some suggestions just use your direct line to me.

Love,
Ballmer