Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Four things Mac OS X can learn from Windows 7

Microsoft has been accused over the years of stealing many of the Mac's features for Windows. But Windows 7 shows that there are things that Apple can learn from Microsoft. Here are four things that Mac OS X can learn from Windows 7.

Windows 7 taskbar

Start off with the new taskbar. Yes, I know that the Windows 7 taskbar has been modeled on the Mac OS X Dock, but Microsoft does it one better. Both the Dock and the Windows 7 taskbar do double duty as task switchers and program launchers. But the Windows 7 taskbar does it better, particularly as a task switcher. When you're running a program, and it's got multiple windows open, you see an indication of how many windows are open. By hovering over the program's icon, you can see thumbnails of every program running. It's simply better than the Dock.

Jump lists

Related to the new taskbar is the new jump list feature. A jump list is a list of actions or items associated with a particular application. To see a jump list for any application, right-click its icon in the taskbar or in the Most Recently Used Application list on the Start menu. Each jump list's actions or items varies according to the program, but generally you'll see a history list of recently opened files, as well as ways to customize how the application works, such as pinning it to the taskbar. When you right-click an icon in the Mac OS X Dock, you also get a list of items, but they don't include recently used files. Mac OS X should learn from Window 7 and add that feature.

Insane Desktop backgrounds

The choice of Windows 7 Desktop backgrounds is as strange and bizarrely entertaining group of artwork as you'll come across on a PC. They combine Sergeant Pepper-style psychedelics with Japanese anime, with a healthy dose of Hieronymus Bosch grotesques thrown in. Microsoft, for once, seems to have gone wild and crazy.

In the Mac OS X background, by way of contrast, Apple seems to have discovered its inner nerd. Beach, forest, nature, abstract art...yes, it's all there, and all exceedingly dull. I have no doubt there are plenty of artists at Apple waiting to strut their stuff. Apple should turn them loose.

Network Center

The Windows Network Center isn't new to Windows 7 --- it's been around since Vista. But it was one of the best things about Vista, and remains one of the best things about Windows. It brings together every setting and option you can imagine about networking -- much superior to the Internet & Network section of Mac OS X's System Preferences. And the Network Map, which shows a live, graphical map of your network, is great as well. Apple should steal it.

What People Are Saying

Desktop Backgrounds/Wallpaper?

You found 4 things! Bravo! One of them is desktop backgrounds? Come on.

Also didn't you catch Snow Leopards new dock features?

It's really 3 things Apple can learn from MS

Since the windows backgrounds you can find online. Not really sure why this point is here? And how many things can MS learn from Apple? Oh, nevermind they already stole all of those ideas already.

5th and most important:

5th and most important: security

osx was the most unsecure os in the world in 2008 (according to ibm x-force). Windows tops even the linux kernel.

Windows 7 has high

Windows 7 has high performance over vista and even XP. It's user friendly and I encountered no crashes or compatibility issues.

It supports a wide range of devices and PC is THE choice for gaming. Economically speaking a PC is generally cheaper than a Mac.

I installed Windows 7 RC1 on both my desktop and my IBM T60 with 512mb RAM. I'm a PC and I will definitely buy Windows 7 when it comes out this summer.

That's all Windows has on OSX?!

Those 4 meaningless points are pretty pathetic!! let's talk stability, functionality, usability...how about the real details and not useless dribble!

Windows heads will always be windows heads ie. as useless as the OS!

Microshaft hasn't got anything right in +20 years since IBM sold them their first OS, lets not forget it was IBMs core code that made Microsoft. IBM Dos it originated as. What would ever make you Microsoft sheep believe that all of a sudden the coders got it right this time around??! LMAO

Bahhhhh - Sheep!

Don't ever compare Mac OS, a real OS to that crap they call an OS, Windoze! when Windoze becomes as stable, functional, and usable as Mac OS always has, and its users and techs actually know how to use a computer, then and only then can you even try to come out with a shot back at Apple. and these 4 petty terms aren't a shot, they only describe how pathetic you people are.

Unix/Linux...Feel the power!!!

I'm only going to counter two things...

1--If your beloved OSX is so stable, then WHY is there an option to "Force Quit"??? Please do tell....

2--Under your "WONDERFUL" Linux, why must a user jerk around at the command prompt (and root, to boot!) to install an RPM package? I was playing around with Fedora 10, and trying to get Adobe's Reader installed was a freakin' nightmare! And, you Linux bois have your nose so far up in the air, heaven forbid a noob ask politely on a forum how to do this.

BTW, Junior, I go back to the days of DOS and assembly language, so don't think I don't know my way around a text interface. But, your average user will have NO clue what to do, and I can only imagine the scorn and disdain that such "experts" like yourself will be happy to heap upon them.

Quite interesting that you

Quite interesting that you would insult many people who use computers which are Windows-based. That doesn't say anything positive about Mac computers. I'm sure that I would enjoy a Mac, simply because I'm into computers, but I would use it in concert with my Windows computers (which I can build myself, incidentally.) They both have merits.

IBM didn't sell Microsoft DOS. As a matter of fact, the deal that Microsoft made with IBM was that Microsoft could sell DOS to whoever they wanted -- a computer on every desktop running Microsoft software -- which is pretty clever, if you think about it.

The father of both the Mac operating system and Windows is the Xerox graphical user interface. Xerox did not quite understand what it had at the time; it was extremely successful in other areas, areas which it knew very, very well, and that's where most of their focus was kept.

Stability, functionality, and usability are all relative. They are not partial to the Mac.

As a geek, I am pleased that you have found a platform that makes you happy. But it doesn't discount all other platforms.

Are you dreaming??

Don't ever compare Mac to WinDOWS? How about you compare that 90% market share to Big Mac's 9%?? Come on!

And I don't think that you can justify calling 90% of the world useless in any sense.

http://www.pcauthority.com.au/Feature/92605,32-reasons-why-pcs-are-better-than-macs.aspx

Microsoft have got something right. No other OS company has as many businesses in the world using their OS. And of all places, business is one of the more important to have a solid OS. XP did that just damn fine. True, it did lack in security, and I mean, Kaspersky does that waaaaaay better. But XP's still going isn't it? And then we can come back to the cost-of-mac's thing, DON'T get me started. Have a read of that link, see how long you last before you give up and think there's to many LEGITIMATE reasons why PC's are better.

I also agree with whats been said above (below not sure where it is placed). If we have to resort to entering anything in the command prompt that cant be done in the UI, its not ready for the world en mass. And on we go, open source is great, not having to pay and being able to change what you want. But the support cannot be offered as Microsoft (or Apple) can, and most users are not able to troubleshoot for themselves.

IMO, Microsoft did YET ANOTHER thing right, they asked US what we wanted for Christmas this time. Perfect. I don't see Apple being humble enough to do that any time soon. And Linux? Still taking everyone else's idea's and making their own lacking spin on things.

So, don't try say Windows, OS X and Linux can't be compared. 1, we have to compare it to something, and there's no point in comparing Mac to an elephant is their? (well we could, neither do anything good for the world). And 2. MAC AND WINDOWS ARE PERFECTLY GOOD COMPETITION FOR EACH OTHER.

Your stubborness and pure

Your stubborness and pure ignorance of the situation staggers me. MS still has a 90% market dominance for a reason, if anything, Windows 7 is a treat to Apple's Mac OS, I have both. Your cutsy little "windoze" and "microshaft" nicknames only help prove my point of your child like opinion on the matter.

Mac OS has one of the least friendly interfaces I've ever used. Let's face facts here, it is not good at working with large numbers of windows, the Windows SuperBar is 10 times faster and more effective at this imo. Aero Peak and Aero Snap are excellent additions to the interface and have beaten out Expose in my opinion, in fact, let's not forget when the Aero interface was truely develped, with Longhorn Beta 2 when Aero Flip and Instant Search were first coded, this is before they were ever put out with Mac OS. Before you go bashing any one OS, I suggest you use it, I've been using Windows 7 since the 6801 pre-beta until the newest Release Candidate, I've also been using Mac OS since the release of version 10.4.9. I *know* these operating systems like the back of my hand, and I know that Mac OS is actually has many similar problems as windows, malware (which yes, is actually a threat to macs to, your in denial if you say otherwise), drive corruption (with windows, it's drive consistancy, with Mac OS, it's permissions, they both require a long drawn out process to fix). I can go on with this for hours but I gather that you more than likely get my point.

Linux and Unix distros as they stand are far from market ready. If I at any time need to refer to the Linux prompt to get anything done that I can't get done in the UI, then the OS is not ready for standard users, the day's of the Command Line UI are over, but Linux users haven't grasped this it seems. Open Source is a brilliant idea, but will never gain market dominance because it simply doesn't make enough money for a large company to sustain itself and provide users with the proper tech support and industry standard technologies they demand.

Technically, MS sold DOS to

Technically, MS sold DOS to IBM and MS bought DOS from Tim Paterson.

And about your remark on real OSs - it can not be more wrong. Under the hood, MAC is a hack over BSD. Take even the simplest stuff - FACLs. They are there since only a few years (introduced 2005 with 10.4) and they are by no means well supported in the GUI.

MacOS is stable only because Apple controls the hardware MAC OS runs on.