Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Google and Microsoft: Separated at birth?

Google is often seen as the anti-Microsoft. But with Google's Chrome announcement it's clear that the the company cultures are a lot more alike than they are different. Microsoft's competitive DNA is embedded in Google's core.

Google is seen by many people as a smart, nimble company that quickly grew from upstart to industry leader, and is the place where the best and brightest go to work. Microsoft, on the other hand, is seen as slow and overgrown, a company whose best days are behind it.

How quickly they forget! Microsoft was once an upstart, the lean-and-mean competitor outmaneuvering a more established, hidebound opponent. It defeated the behemoths of all computing behemoths, IBM, and in short order owned the market for operating systems and application software. The best and brightest flocked to it. Sounds a lot like Google, doesn't it?

Microsoft got where it is because of Bill Gates' unquenchable hunger for business success. At one time WordPerfect owned the word processing market, Lotus owned the spreadsheet market, and Harvard Graphics owned the presentation software market. Netscape had the browser market locked up.

But Gates wasn't satisfied with what amounted to a monopoly in operating systems. He targeted those competitors, and eventually Microsoft owned those markets as well.

Google may have a friendlier face than Microsoft, but it has the same unquenchable hunger to conquer virtually any market related to computing, and will stop at nothing to get there, in the same way that Microsoft did.

That's why it's launching Chrome. It's not satisfied with what amounts to a monopoly over search. It wants to own the desktop as well, the operating system, and the applications that run on it. If it has its way, you'll use a Google-powered computer to do Google searches, run Google applications, and store your data on Google servers. Your cell phone will run a Google operating system, and all of your phone calls, via landlines as well as cell phones, will be routed through Google Voice. You'll send instant messages via Google Talk. Every part of your computing and communicating life will be tied to Google in some way. The breadth of what it wants makes even Microsoft's old ambitions seem small.

There was a time when Microsoft was in the federal government's cross-hairs because of what was viewed as anti-competitive behavior. These days, the feds are after Google. Expect there to be multiple investigations over the next few years, related not just to monopolistic behavior, but to privacy issues as well.

So Google may seem as the anti-Microsoft. In fact, though, Microsoft's competitive DNA is at the core of Google's cultural makeup.

What People Are Saying

I wonder if Google will ever

I wonder if Google will ever make available to everybody the source code of their search engine. Until that time comes, Google is just another proprietary company.

Very nice post

Gralla, I agree 100% and liked your post very much.

I´m a 50 years old guy from Brazil and I remember very well Microsoft´s first steps.

“In fact, though, Microsoft's competitive DNA is at the core of Google's cultural makeup” – it´s very nice!

Keep in mind that Microsoft

Keep in mind that Microsoft sold IBM a product that didn't exist at that time. Bill Gates heard of a guy who had such an operating system, but Gates was only able to dish out some decent dough, because he already had the fraudulent deal signed with IBM.
Yes, fraudulent deal, and on top of that the guy who really wrote "MS-DOS" got screwed by Gates, who knew better at that time.
That is at the core of Microsoft: screwing people as much as possible without doing much themselves. A large amount of Microsoft's products is not even made by Microsoft. It is a hodgepodge of stolen and bought code.

The only thing Microsoft excels as is FUD, deception, and making people continue paying money for mediocre products that come with no service.

Bogus FUD

Google and MS are worlds apart:

1. The vast majority of Google products are free.
2. Google does not try to dictate what vendors (or users) install.
3. Google code and data is mostly non-proprietary and standards-based.
4. Google has not been convicted of abusing it's monopoly position.
5. There is still plenty of competition to Google's product(s).
6. Google does not (AFIK) actively and openly stifle competition.
7. Google has not and probably never will have to pay billions in fines and penalties for unethical behavior.
8. Google's OS will only succeed if it's well executed and accepted, not because they have vendors/users over a barrel.

and you believe in Santa Claus...

Google's products are free??? - you certainly do believe in Santa Claus ... I don't trust a company that imposes censhorship on content based on business interest (such as in China, for instance) ... please, Google is as monopolistic as any other company that gets market dominance - they just release 'free products' (as you beleieve) to get traffic and charge the eyeballs of advertisers for that ... or to hurt other companies (such as Microsoft) that can certainly threat their monopolistic business (i.e., advertisement) - Santa Claus believer, sorry but they are not and never will be a NOT FOR PROFIT organization.

*cough*

1. For now, to establish a base.
2. HA! True, but once you do they give you FAR less input on how to use that software, and have significant privacy issues revolving around many of their services.
4. Yet. You'd have to be blind to not see it coming sooner or later.
7. Refer to 4.

yawn

In a year from now we'll remember the google OS as much as we remember the google cellphone today...

OS is not so easy

Google seems to think a "super browser" based on a linux kernel will do the job. Unless they restrain it to a "walled garden" of hardware the way Apple does it, there will be too many issues and consumers will yawn and leave. Getting an OS to work in the x86 world with its wide range of hardare components and subcomponents is hellish. There is no easy way to accound for the infinite number of combinations that the OS has to run on. Despite all the whining I hear about MSFT, they have done a damn good job making it work in what is a totally random platform environment...