Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Seth Weintraub's picture
Seth Weintraub

Apple versus Google

Google/ARM netbooks still have to play the name game

By now, just about everyone knows that Google Android isn't just an operating system for mobile phones. T-Mobile was outed today by the New York Times as planning a number of Android-based devices for the home. Plans are going forward for Google's Linux OS to be put on ARM-based Mobile Internet Devices(MIDs) and, more importantly, netbooks in the next few months.

ARM based? (Try to stick with me here.)

If that was your reaction, you aren't alone. If you've even heard of ARM, you know that they design embedded chips and chips for all kinds of small mobile devices, phones and iPods ... but until now, not laptops. In fact, you probably didn't know that ARM based chips far outsell Intel chips worldwide.

Why would Google's hardware partners and perhaps even Apple choose to make a laptop with an ARM based chip?

ARM's new Cortex A8 based processors have roughly the same horsepower per cycle as Intel's Atom 270-280 chips but run at a fraction of the power and cost a fraction of the price. Their next generation chip designs, the A9 series, are even faster and more miserly on power. This is exactly what netbook makers want.

They can run Web browsers and Adobe Flash applications with ease and also do very well with OpenGL based graphics. They can run Linux, MacOSX, Symbian and even WindowsCE/Mobile fairly easily (but they don't do regular Windows).

ARM doesn't produce their own chips. They license the designs out to other hardware vendors like TI, Samsung, Qualcomm, NVIDIA, maaaybe Apple and even Intel. The hardware manufacturers are responsible for marketing them to hardware vendors and getting them into devices. The problem here is that all of these different hardware vendors are going to compete with mighty Intel for the hearts and minds of consumers, not hardware engineers. They are out of their league.

These ARM Cortex A8 processors are already appearing in high end phones and MIDs like the Palm Pre, Open Pandora and Archos' new phone. In these devices, the processor is called the TI OMAP 3400 series.

So if you aren't an ARM processor geek, you are probably starting to get a little lost here. This is the problem for ARM.

The average consumer is going to be seeing Netbook A based on the Intel Atom chip. Netbook B is going to be running something like the NVIDIA Tegra based processor. There are 500 different netbooks on the market right now; 95% of them use the Intel Atom chip. Most consumers, given that choice, would pick Intel because they know the name and the Atom brand.

That's why ARM really needs to start thinking about consolidating their hardware brands and come up with an umbrella idea that its partners can market. The idea needs to address the fact that ARM is in more machines than Intel, uses less power and costs less money but is still a superior product.

Think brand isn't important in processor sales? A few years ago, when Intel was playing with Itanium, AMD slipped in a superior 64bit processor line that flat outran Intel for a few years. Intel's name and brand kept them afloat until their engineers caught up with and eventually surpassed AMD's designs. Without Intel's superior name and "Intel Inside" program, they might have lost out to AMD. Now AMD is close to bankruptcy while Intel is flying high.

ARM needs to learn a lesson from this. They have a solid name in "Cortex". It is the core of the machine which is the brain like the cerebral cortex. It could be the next "Pentium"... or "Cortex Inside". But they need to really work on this and spend some money delivering the message to consumers. They are about to go head to head with mighty Intel in the battle for the netbook/MID.

They can't afford to go in unARMed. (I'll be here all week folks!)

 

 

What People Are Saying

marketing

One more point. Marketing in netbooks, as in personal computing in general, is primarily carried out by the oem's, not the cpu manufacturers.

Ordinary users have very

Ordinary users have very little awareness of cpu brands. How many who bought an AMD box even know it? How many people even know who made the cpu in their cell phone? The 64 bit story doesn't count because at the time it was mostly about servers, not ordinary users.

People will buy ARM netbooks because they will be much cheaper and run much longer. Or they won't buy them because they don't run Windows. Unfamiliarity with the ARM brand will matter very little.

ARM tried this before with a

ARM tried this before with a branding campaign called 'ARM Powered'. It only ended up on a handful of devices before it was dropped.

None of the manufacturers wanted it and ARM really didn't have the money to push it like Intel does in it's advertising program for vendors like Dell & HP.

It really boils down to whether Intel uses the whole intel inside campaign for Atom, trying to make out anything else is not compatible. The danger is if they do get Atom into public consciousness and then either the reviewers or ARM manage to get them to perceive Atom as being power hungry and compatibility doesn't really matter in the netbook arena. Then they've created a rod for their own back.

ARM or Cortex?

I have used ARM processors in many products, all the way back to the Apple Newton.

It seems to me that there already should be some product recognition of processors named ARM that some fraction of the public recognizes; why reset to no recognition with a product name like "Cortex"?

ARM history

ARM started life on a desktop computer, the Acorn Archimedes. My first ARM assembler program was to speed up a school registration system runing on a full sized desktop machine. In those days Acorn Geeks had little stickers with Intel Outside on their computers. Since the first Acorn machine was the Acorn Atom, maybe someone can sue Intel for trademark infringement :-)

Man, have you over simplified this issue.

Your comparisons with Intel aren't applicable. Intel survived the AMD attack because Intel is huge, smart and had incredible inertia. AMD caught them asleep in the faster, faster, hotter, hotter cycle with a 64 bit series that reinvented low speed, high throughput. Intel responded with incredible focus and power. At the critical point, AMD choked with Barcelona and gave Inteil a chance to catch up and pass them. Intel was never in danger, except to lose some market share which was really good for competition. Now AMD has sold out to Mid East factions and lost much of their USA support base. The have missed out compeletly on the netbook and are in real trouble. Will they make it? I don't know.

This netbook business is really a spear in the heart of Microsoft who can no longer enjoy the margins it had with Windows. Windows 7 in restricted mode on a netbook will be joke and they won't be able to force the ARM manufacturers to load Windows and ignore Linux as Windows won't run on ARM. By the time they forced their customers to beta test their ARM version, Linux will be in.

Every day we hear of the demise of Linux.

Every day their are more Penguins.

Wake up and smell the future.

Power/Endurance

Consumers will buy x hours of operation on a charge. There is nothing wrong with calling the processors, "ARM".