Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Google Chrome: First run around the track

I like the idea of Google Chrome, a lot. But, then I like a lot of ideas, and then the reality turns out to be another matter entirely. Once in a great while, though, something comes along that lives up to its promise. Google Chrome lives up to its promise.

That promise, as I describe in The real reason Google is making Chrome, is to take out Microsoft Office and, in larger terms, replace the desktop application metaphor with a Web application one. I don't think, however, that Google wants to get into the operating system business or replace Windows.

I do think that Chrome, once it moves to Linux, has the potential to be a big help for desktop Linux. If Google is successful with its Chrome scheme, then a side-effect will be to dwindle Windows' market share.

For some basics on what's what with Chrome, Barbara Krasnoff does a fine job of reviewing Chrome. What I did was to see if Chrome lives up, in practice, to its promises of faster, much faster, Web application, specifically JavaScript performance.

To do this, I installed the Chrome beta on a Gateway 503GR. This system uses a 3GHz Pentium IV CPU, 2GB of RAM, an ATI Radeon 250 graphics card, and a 300GB SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) hard drive. On this older PC, I was running XP SP3.

After I installed it, and imported my bookmarks from Firefox 3, I just roamed around the sites I visit multiple times a day such as ComputerWorld, NewsForge, and NetworkWorld. One of the things these sites have in common is JavaScript-based ads. With Firefox 3, these sites are often slow to initially load; with IE (Internet Explorer) 7, these sites are painfully slow to load; with Chrome, "Wow!"

"Wow!" is these sites exploding, instead of crawling, on my display. A quick run of the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark revealed that it wasn't just my perception. The test showed that IE 7 had a result of 59,682.1 milliseconds; Firefox 3.01 came in with 11,267.1 milliseconds; and Chrome ripped off a remarkable 3,617.8 milliseconds.

This, I might add was on a PC that was state of the art for 2005. On a newer system, Chrome's results would be even more impressive.

OK, that's great, but what about JavaScript-based applications like Google's own applications. To find out, I ran Gmail, Google Docs, and Google Calendar.

Guess what, these applications on Chrome blasted by the same applications working with the same data on Firefox and IE. It seemed to me that Chrome was running at least twice as fast as did on Firefox. I won't even mention IE.

How fast is that really? Fast enough that, for the first time, I can see ordinary users using Web-based applications instead of desktop-based applications for their every day work. Microsoft Office look out.

 

Related News and Blogs

What People Are Saying

Chrome Abruptly Stopped Working

I was quite happy with Chrome. But then, one day it decided to stop loading, at all! I click the icon, it flashes the browser for a millisecond and closes... Very bizarre. No warning. No nothing. No viruses on my computer. Other browsers work fine...

Looking at bug fixes... No solution.

Won't Load

Chrome won't load for me. I'm running XP Pro and nothing works. I can shut down everything, reboot and on and on...no go. It will load the updater, but that is it. If I then look at programs to remove, updater is there, but no chrome. I can check the file directories and nothing there for Chrome. Looking around I see a lot of others having similar problems with various Win OS's.

Im having the exact same

Im having the exact same problem and really am hating chrome browser. I mean it wont open anything at all. Even google!!!

phones home, disasterous EULA....

wow. One of Chrome's basic "features" is to optimize your searching and browsing, based on which sites you choose from a search result, what locations you directly type into the address bar, and so on.

In normal operations, it "phones home" with all your activities. It's like a sexy KGB agent-- pretty to look at, but after a couple of dates, the secret police are gonna know EVERYTHING about you.

As with GMail, I expect that Chrome will "live up to it's promise" by not promising anything (GMail is still officially in "beta" status, use at your own risk. Their "personal health record" is even worse, encouraging you to give up HIPPA protections right and left. Because Google is not a Health care PROVIDER, they don't have to obey the privacy requirements built into the law.)

Google Chrome claims certain "rights" to the content of anything you look at. It's a privacy disaster, and seems to hand over rights to your own website content to Google just by looking at it. Steven, you're merely looking only at how pretty it is-- not what it's doing! It's basically a keylogger with a pretty web browser on top, and I don't want keyloggers on my computers (or my customers' computers).

It's still Firefox (with noscript !!) for me.

Google's privacy makes chrome a no-go

As with all Google products, their privacy rules allow them to harvest and then use and sell your data. Skip Chrome, stick with Firefox. I know I will.

http://www.jeremyduffy.com/beware-google-browsers-license-agreement/

I am google fan and was

I am google fan and was looking forward to try chrome.

My first experience with Chrome was not good for two reasons.

1. I have some HTML file with javascript and Chrome just couldn't load that page.

The page contains a 100 row with 20 columns, the javascript show/hides ~10 columns of the tables. while IE & FF can easily do that whereas chrome was just hung. Also it asked me to kill that page. BTW i use IE7 & FF3

2. Chrome doesn't support "expression specification in CSS"
I have CSS specification :
thead tr{
font-size:small;
border:1 solid black;
background:khaki;color: #009900;
font-weight:bold;
text-decoration: none;
position:relative;
top: expression(offsetParent.scrollTop);
}

Chrome can not handle "expression"
Though FF3 also doesn't support this but IE does.

FF 3.1 is about to come with

FF 3.1 is about to come with a VM for JS... That may just take out one more advantage of Chrome... If the question is just about performance I think FF will match upto chrome 80% in speed and by then computers will be so fast, it may just stop mattering.!! That leaves google with just the idea of its web applications, which may catch on quite well. But only time can tell this.
Could FF also implement Google API to exploit the web-application concept thru its extensions? If they can google is in a run for its money....But either ways no one will use MS office ;-)

Got the Chrome Blues?

Got the Chrome blues?

Here's a quick fix to darken the appearance of the bright blue browser recently released. Although the browser,and consequently, the UI design decisions are conceptually great, the colors of the UI are just a little too bright for me. So here you will find a 'fix' - or at least my choice for colors (surprised the Android team didn't suggest this)

To apply this theme, simply download the default.dll and place it in the following directory:
C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\0.2.149.27\Themes

Make sure you back up the default.dll that is in there!

Preview of the 'muted' theme..

First look at Chrome

I'm also quite impressed so far, but I won't be using it until it collects add-ons like my favorite Firefox ones โ€“ especially the brilliant No Squint, which any computer with reasonably fine resolution should have if users value their eyesight. Much better than continually hitting Ctrl and the + sign.

Equivalents to Adblock, FlashBlock and FireFTP are pretty vital to me also. On this page, right now, moving Flash adverts are distracting me. They have to DIE before I come back here via Chrome!

And Chrome simply has to allow the Roboform toolbar.

I haven't measured timings, but I can't say that Chrome _feels_ faster than Firefox - in fact the first time I pointed Chrome to the Computerworld home page, it took a ridiculously long time to load. But that's a tough ask - down here in New Zealand at least, Computerworld has one of the slowest sites on the Web.

I can't see Chrome turning me on to cloud computing in a hurry. Increasingly I find myself doing synchronised backups through the web and I'm using Gmail more and more, but when it comes to professional work, I just won't rely on an Internet connection, thanks. Not yet anyway.

Speaking of Gmail, I've put that on my Quick Launch group, via Chrome's 'Create Application Shortcuts' feature. It's a really neat idea and I can see how the feature could be useful should I ever decide to give up MS Office and move onto Cloud Nine.

What is interesting is the

What is interesting is the speed of this new browser. I just took it for a test spin and it's a lot faster compared to other browsers. The statistics tell what you need to know http://google-chrome.com/?p=104