That promise, as I describe in The real reason Google is making Chrome, is to take out Microsoft Office and, in larger terms, replace the desktop application metaphor with a Web application one. I don't think, however, that Google wants to get into the operating system business or replace Windows.
I do think that Chrome, once it moves to Linux, has the potential to be a big help for desktop Linux. If Google is successful with its Chrome scheme, then a side-effect will be to dwindle Windows' market share.
To do this, I installed the Chrome beta on a Gateway 503GR. This system uses a 3GHz Pentium IV CPU, 2GB of RAM, an ATI Radeon 250 graphics card, and a 300GB SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) hard drive. On this older PC, I was running XP SP3.
This, I might add was on a PC that was state of the art for 2005. On a newer system, Chrome's results would be even more impressive.
Guess what, these applications on Chrome blasted by the same applications working with the same data on Firefox and IE. It seemed to me that Chrome was running at least twice as fast as did on Firefox. I won't even mention IE.
How fast is that really? Fast enough that, for the first time, I can see ordinary users using Web-based applications instead of desktop-based applications for their every day work. Microsoft Office look out.
Related News and Blogs