Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Google Maps now offering walking directions

I've never suggested it to anyone, but I always wished there was an online mapping service that complemented its driving directions with walking ones. In Massachusetts, we're accustomed to a variety of perplexing and congested one-way streets and restricted turns that are easier to navigate on foot than on wheels. How hard would it be to ignore those roadway directions and send us pedestrians via the quickest, shortest routes?

Someone else had the same idea, for as of today, Google Maps now offers walking directions. The feature is still in beta: it does not incorporate pedestrian-only off-road paths, and the option to toggle from driving directions to walking will not appear for routes over 6.2 miles. You don't need to be plotting a walk across America to find that distance limiting — many leisure walks easily extend beyond that length. But for the around-town needs the directions are intended to fulfill, it's a great first start, and coincidentally estimates the travel time at my own walking speed average of 3 MPH.

Google Maps now offers walking directions.

If you find this feature useful, you may also be interested in (or already know about) Walk Score, which determines the "walkability" of any neighborhood based on how much you can do within the address you input. This means that downtown Boston or New York City will have a high walkability score, while almost anywhere in the expansive landscapes of Kansas or Montana will not, making it a tool more valuable for living with limited gasoline consumption than for finding a leisurely Sunday stroll.

I'm hoping the webmaster of Pedestrianfriendly.com will be along shortly to comment on these intersections of technology and simplicity. In the meantime, enjoy these new ways to reintroduce yourself to your neighborhoods.

(Hat tips to Chris Coyne and Today in iPhone)

See also:

What People Are Saying

Google Walking

I like the idea, although so far the execution is somewhat spotty. I'm curious about the algorithm they're using. Based on a few routes I see, it appears that they're looking for shortest distance, thus allowing things via walking like going the "wrong way" on a one-way road that you can't do by car. However, some of the routes they suggest are actually rather pedestrian-hostile in the real world.

It would be much more useful if they could factor in true walkability issues such as streetscape, separation between pedestrians and traffic, whether intersections are crossable, and so on. Maybe they could partner with Walk Score.

Sharon Machlis of Computerworld and pedestrianfriendly.com :)

A fast SUV

I checked my walk from home to the center of town. There's a lovely side road that I take that winds past some old houses, lots of trees and flowers, and includes a bit of a hill for your aerobic pleasure. The occasional vehicle on this road would likely be doing about 20 mph. Did Google have me on it? Nope. It recommended a parallel road where average speed is about 40 mph, with no sidewalks, curbs or room for anything extra if a wide vehicle came by. Is Run Off the Road the new Pilates?

Two good resources

Hi Ken -- yeah, Walk Score (a Seattle-based firm!) is terrific; I've recommended it in particular to anyone planning a move. (Would love to hear if they're planning any tagging ability, so those of us who live in these neighborhoods can comment on or augment the maps. You're gonna do a followup blog post on this, right? Right? :-) )

And the new Google functionality is sweet, especially for beta. I'm hoping the 6.2-mile limit is simply some sort of beta limit, in fact. For now, testing it on a few tricky local treks, I like what I've seen. But the example you show above does raise one question, which also might be solvable by tagging -- not only does the system not know about pedestrian-only paths, obviously it doesn't realize that one of those Framingham roads it gave you HAS NO SIDEWALKS. Nevermind "use caution in unfamiliar areas" -- the warning on *those* directions ought to say ACK ACK ACK YOU'RE GONNA GET RUN OVER BY AN SUV!!!